Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM01489
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2008 | EGRANT1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/18/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 18 APRIL 2008 T08CM01121/EDGE HIGH SCHOOL REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET X.1: A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY B. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTES TO BE 4' MIN AS PER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. C. PROVIDE ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. D. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING SIZE OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. 1. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE E. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE DETAIL F. ALL THREE LOADING ZONES MUST COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND SPOT GRADES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. G. LOADING ZONES AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE TWO SEPARATE ENTITIES AND MAY NOT BE COMBINED. AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 503, AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS A CONTINUOUS, UNOBSTRUCTED PATH THAT BE ADJOINED BY THE LOADING ZONE ACCESS ISLE. 1. PROVIDE A SEPARATE 4' WIDE ACCESSIBLE PATH AT THE LOADING ZONE NEAREST THE AUTO DRIVE APRON FROM NORTH FORGEUS STREET. PROVIDE A SEPARATE 5' LOADING ZONE ACCESS ISLE. 2. THE PATH WAY FROM THE TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TO THE FIRST DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP NEEDS TO BE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, NOT A LOADING ZONE ISLE. H. D.O. SPACES 3 AND 6 ARE NOT DROP OFF SPACES BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO ADJACENT ACCESS ISLE. REVISE THESE AS PARKING SPACES. I. THE TWO DETECTABLE WARNINGS LOCATED IN THE CONCRETE WALK AREA NEAR THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, (NOTE 18). ARE THESE PART OF A CURB OR SIDE WALK RAMP SYSTEM OR IS THE CONCRETE WALK FLUSH WITH VEHICLE PAVING? IF THE CONCRETE WALK AREAS ARE RAISED, PROVIDE LARGE SCALE CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMP DETAILS COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1 ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS, SECTION 405 AND 406. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES SHOWING COMPLIANCE. J. FOR THE SAFETY OF DISABLED PERSONS WITH VISION IMPAIRMENT, A PHYSICAL SEPARATION FROM ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AND VEHICLE AREAS IS NEEDED. PARKING AREAS THAT ARE FLUSH WITH THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAYS DO NOT PROVIDE A PHYSICAL SEPARATION. THERE ARE SEVERAL WAYS THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED: 1. RAISE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALKWAY AND PROVIDE A 6" HIGH CURB AND WALK AREA. 2. PROVIDE A SURFACE MOUNTED, CONTINUOUS, CONCRETE CURB BARRIER APPROXIMATELY 4" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 3. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS GUARD RAIL 4. PROVIDE A 2' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING (TRUNCATED DOMES) AND A 4' WIDE MINIMAL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WALK WAY BEHIND THE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP, ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FLUSH SURFACE AREA. THIS IS APPLICABLE TO ALL THE PARKING AREAS THAT ARE FLUSH WITH THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES SHOWING COMPLIANCE. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/21/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/07/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: T08CM01121, 2555 E. 1st Street Existing Edge Charter School, new parking and drop off layout changes Commercial Site Plan, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings with redlines and response letter, stating how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS) and for compliance of site plan content in DS 2-02. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, please provide a legal description for the site. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.4, please revise location map on sheet 1 to a scale of 3" = 1 mile and include 1st Street, Forgeus Ave, and Tucson Blvd. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, regarding setbacks: A) please revise the required setback notes for the east and south property lines, as those are abutting streets. Per LUC 3.2.6.5.A, choose and note which is a front street and side street. LIST required setbacks as "front street lot line setback = greater of 21' or 1.5 times height of the exterior building wall, side street lot line setback= 10'. B) list required setbacks for WEST property line as: "THE GREATER OF: 20' per LUC 3.5.3.7.F, - OR - 1.5 times the height of the exterior building wall per LUC 3.2.6.4. 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, regarding parking: A) Per DS 3-05.2.1.3, appears fencing on perimeter of site abutting parking. keynote fencing and note that parking spaces abutting vertical objects taller than 6" must be 10' wide. Check parking spaces along perimeter and near transformer. (per email with applicant's office, no perimeter fencing - line represents property line.) B) regarding the parking space at the end of the row of drop off spaces, please provide the angle of the space and dimension all lines and depths, and amount of vehicle overhang of the space per LUC 3.3.7.2 and DS 3-05. C) I acknowledge the request for a DDO to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 35 to 31. Once comments 5, 7 and 8 are addressed, application to DDO allowed 6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, regarding bicycle parking: A) please specify the number of faculty in the bicycle parking calculation B) please provide a bicycle parking detail - sheet x1.2 as referenced, is missing 7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.10, show sight visibility triangles please. (See comment 8B - only necessary if two way travel in PAAL off Forgeus Ave is proposed.) 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, regarding ingress/egress: A) please dimension both access points to the site B) provide a one way ingress off Forgeus Avenue - or a sight visibility triangle will be required for two way ingress/egress off Forgeus and will remove further parking, requiring a variance. 9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, for pedestrian access: (ACCESSIBLE REVIEW SEPARATE) A) per David Rivera on 4/08/08, the 2 original drop off spaces that had striped asphalt surfacing for the pedestrian refuge (at entrance to site) may remain striped asphalt. B) please advise if the area noted as "accessible route" directly off Forgeus is concrete and if it is in flush with the existing asphalt pedestrian refuge. C) advise if connection from asphalt pedestrian refuge at drop off to site entry is concrete D) to provide physical separation between walkway and vehicular use area, per DS 2-08.4.1, continue the curbing in PAAL serving drop off lanes all the way north to edge of asphalt pedestrian refuge at drop off space. E) per Zoning Administrator's advisement 3/27/08, provide concrete, 6' wide, adjacent to the 6 new drop off spaces for adequate pedestrian refuge. F) per DS 2-08.5.1.A, please ensure all gates are a minimum of 4' wide to ensure sidewalks meet this code section. G) per DS 3-08.3.1, provide pedestrian access to the dumpster - a tree is in the way. 10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13, please show any new free-standing signage. 11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, please provide a loading zone calculation per LUC 3.4.5.4 that 1 space at 12x35 is required. Note that no spaces are provided, as there are none existing for same use and this project is not a change of use requiring full code compliance. 12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.19, provide dimensions for Forgeus Avenue, location of centerline, travel lane, parking lane and curb. 13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, call out any and all easements graphically with recordation info. 14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25, call out any new free-standing lighting. 15. Per DS 2-02.2.1.31, please clarify school is EXISTING, note the project is restriping of existing asphalt area for parking and drop off lanes, landscaping & pedestrian changes. 16. Per DS 2-02.2.A.1, provide overall acreage and square footage of site on sheet x1.1 17. Per DS 2-02.2.A.3, for records, provide actual floor area ratio in decimal format. 18. Provide note that all gates are to be open during school hours. 19. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951 HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T08CM01121 2555 E. 1st Edge school.doc RESUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/09/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | Needs review when DDO process is complete. |
| 05/27/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/03/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |