Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM01471
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9 CONCERNING LETTERING SIZE: PER CLAUDIA BUFORD, APPEAL AND CHECK REQUESTING 3/32" LETTERING HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED OR PROCESSED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE VERIFY. |
| 07/09/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/11/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Rock - Airport Industrial Center T08CM01470, T08CM01471, & T08CM01472, Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 11, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning acknowledges that per your response letter dated June 16, 2008 that an approved site plan was attached. Zoning was not able to locate the attached approved site plan. Based on information available for Site Plan review #T08CM00528 the site plan for this project has not been approved at this time. Once the site plan under T08CM00528 has been approved and two (2) copies of the stamped approved site plans have been attached to the building plan sets zoning can review the building plan. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm01470.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/17/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/17/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The occupancy referenced in the mechanical code is based upon the actual use of individual rooms or areas. (See Table 403.3, IMC 2006 for examples of the ventilation requirements for each type of use.) The calculations shown for the building are based on Section 403.3, IMC 2006 but the total amount of outside air has not been adjusted to comply with the common ventilation requirements. Revise the ventilation calculations to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006. |
| 07/17/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (27.20') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation for Suites B and C (27.50'). Provide backwater valves per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. The thermostat on a water heater shall not be used to control the temperature of the water delivered to a public lavatory. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 3. If the water heater is to be located above the restroom ceiling, revise detail 1/P3.1 appropriately, including a water-tight pan with a drain (Section 508.4, UPC 2006); access, a working platform, convenience receptacle and light (Section 509.4, UPC 2006); and a vacuum relief valve (Section 608.7, UPC 2006). Note that the necessary architectural details noted on sheet P1.1A were not found. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valves for the water closets (see water riser schematic) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS (note that the flush valves will pass 1.6 gallons in approximately 4 seconds) for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 5. Show the size, route, and termination of the temperature and pressure relief pipe for the water heater. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 608.3, and 608.4, UPC 2006. 6. Show the locations for the water hammer arrestors. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006. 7. Coordinate the plumbing plan with the waste and vent schematic with respect to the relative fixture locations Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/24/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO PERMIT ON SITE PRIVATE SEWER #PT08SO1612- NEED TO BUILD PUBLIC SEWER NEED DSC/1ST FLOOR HOLD HARMLESS LETTER |
| 07/31/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Provide a detail and calculations for pole and foundation, prepared and sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer, for all poles over 20' in height. PREVIOUS COMMENT. 2. Please add the following note to the plans, preferably E1.1: "Special inspection needed for lighting fixtures". Reference Tucson Lighting Code, Section 16. 3. Panel LP2 is MLO on its panel schedule, but has a main according to the Single Line Diagram. Please clarify. |
| 08/01/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plan can not be approved prior to site plan or grading plan approval. Provide an approved site and grading plan for building plan review. |