Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM01470
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Coordinate the room descriptions and uses with the architect. Revise the ventilation calculations as needed. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006. |
| 09/26/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The listing information for the specified water hammer arrestors (as well as the industry standard, PDI-WH-201) indicates that the devices are to be placed as close as possible to the quick-closing valves or, between the last two fixtures for branches with multiple fixtures if the branch is shorter than 20 feet from the last fixture to the point of relief. The point of relief is defined as a pipe that is "two nominal pipe sizes greater than the branch line in question" (PDI-WH-201).The proposed location of the water hammer arrestor does not appear to be installed per the manufacturer's listing information. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006. |