Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM01470
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2008 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/15/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Rock - Airport Industrial Center T08CM01470, T08CM01471 & T08CM01472 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t08cm01470.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The submitted common ventilation calculations, using equation 4-1, appear to be incorrect. Using the combined outside and total airflow rates you supplied for HP-1 and HP-2, the correct amount of outside air should be 939 CFM, not 560 CFM. Reference: Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006. |
| 08/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | The provided civil site drawing shows the size and route of the building water supply along with the location for the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly but it does not provide the sizes of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly being installed. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 |
| 08/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the labeling of the vacuum relief and the water heater drain in detail 1/P3.1. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. The listing information for the specified water hammer arrestors (as well as the industry standard, PDI-WH-201) indicates that the devices are to be placed as close as possible to the quick-closing valves or, between the last two fixtures for branches with multiple fixtures if the branch is shorter than 20 feet from the last fixture to the point of relief. The point of relief is defined as a pipe that is "two nominal pipe sizes greater than the branch line in question" (PDI-WH-201).The proposed location of the water hammer arrestor does not appear to be installed per the manufacturer's listing information. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006. |
| 09/08/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plan can not be approved prior to site plan or grading plan approval. Provide an approved site and grading plan for building plan review. |
| 09/08/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/08/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO PERMIT ON SITE PRIVATE SEWER #PT08SO1612- NEED TO BUILD PUBLIC SEWER NEED DSC/1ST FLOOR HOLD HARMLESS LETTER |