Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T08CM00929
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T08CM00929 4/30/08 9528 E. WATSON DR. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE, AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2006 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. 4. ALL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS INVOLVED IN THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE ARE TO SEAL THE RELATED SHEETS OF PLANS, DETAILS AND CALCULATIONS. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THE STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL REGISTRATION. SITE PLAN: 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METER AND WATER SERVICE LINE. FLOOR PLANS: 1. SPECIFY A LINTEL FOR THE OPENING BETWEEN THE DOUBLE 3O68 POCKET DOOR AND THE EXISTING HOUSE. PLEASE SPECIFY THE OTHER LINTELS / HEADERS. 2. LOCATE AND IDENTIFY SHEAR WALL TYPES AND LOCATIONS. PROVIDE NAILING SCHEDULE AND HOLD-DOWNS, IF REQUIRED. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. PROVIDE LINTELS FOR MASONRY WALLS AND HEADERS FOR FRAME WALLS. 2. FRAMING PLAN / S2 ; THE 6X8 #2 DF APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE FOR THE PORCH'S RIDGE BEAM. PLEASE JUSTIFY. INCLUDE THE A/C IN LOADS. 3. SPECIFY LUMBER GRADE AND SPECIES. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. 3 / S1 ; PLEASE CHANGE THE DESCRIPTION OF THE CMU TO 8X4X16 INSTEAD OF 8X16X4. 2. 5 / S1 ; SPECIFY THE DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE RED-HEADS. 3. 6 / S1 ; ALL EXTERIOR WALLS REQUIRE FOOTINGS. R403.1 , TABLE R403.1 , R403.1.4 . 4. FOUNDATION PLAN KEY NOTE 6 / S1 ; SPECIFY THE DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE RED HEADS . 5. 4 / S2 ; PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED ROOF FRAMING PLAN OF THE LIVING ROOM TO PROVIDE THE LENGTH AND LOADS ON THE EXISTING RIDGE BEAM SO I CAN CHECK THE CANTILEVER'S ABILITY TO CARRY THE NEW RIDGE BEAM. WOULD A "HINGE HANGER", ie SIMPSON "HCA", BE EASIER TO USE THAN THE HARDWARE IN 4 / S2? 6. 1 / S3 ; PROVIDE CEILING HEIGHTS. 7. 1, 2, 3, 6 / S3 ; SHOW FIRE BLOCKS @ CEILING LINES. R602.8 ITEM 2 . 8. 5, 6 /S3 ; WHAT SIZE ARE THE 1 ½" SCREWS? 9. GENERAL NOTE 4 / A1 ; PLEASE CHANGE THE 4X8X16 DESCRIPTION OF THE CMU TO 8X4X16 . 10. NATURAL LIGHT AND VENTILATION / A1 ; THE ONLY WINDOW IN THE GREAT ROOM THAT OPENS IS THE 5030 XO. THE VENT SECTION OF A 5030 XO DOESN'T PROVIDE 12.4 SQUARE FEET OF OPENING, 4% OF 310 S.F. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. PROVIDE A VENT FOR THE TUB. THE TUB IS DRAWN DRAINING INTO THE TAIL PIECE OF THE LAV AND YOU CAN'T HAVE TWO TRAPS ON AN ARM. EACH FIXTURE SHALL BE SEPARATELY TRAPPED. P3201.6 …..ALSO, THE LAV IS TO HIGH! THE 2" TUB DRAIN LIMITS THE TRAP TO BE WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE VENT. SEE ALSO, UPC 1001.1 2. THE WATER CLOSET AND THE LAV'S TRAP SHOULD BE SEPARATED. THE LAV SHOULD DRAIN INTO THE VENT THE LAV'S VENT SHOULD DRAIN INTO THE BUILDING DRAIN AND BE ROUTED TO THE WATER CLOSET'S VENT, WHICH SHOULD DRAIN TO THE BUILDING SEWER OUTSIDE. THE WATER CLOSET SHOULD DRAIN INTO WATER CLOSET VENT. 3. YOU'VE USED BOTH THE U.P.C. AND THE I.P.C. THE CODES AREN'T TO BE USED TOGETHER. PICK ONE OR THE OTHER. 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE OR THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE. 4. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO JUSTIFY THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE WATER SUPPLY TO THE EXISTING AS WELL AS THE NEW BATH ROOM. UPC 610 . 5. NOTE ON PLAN COMPLIANCE WITH WATER CONSERVATION; WATER CLOSETS 1.6 GALLONS PER FLUSH, SINKS AND SHOWERHEADS 3 GALLONS PER MINUTE. 6. PROVIDE THE INPUT RATE OF THE EXISTING 5 TON GAS PACK'S GAS SECTION. 7. PLEASE CHECK THE GAS PIPE SIZES. UPC 1216 ; IRC G2413. 8. PLEASE SIZE THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SIZES. IRC CHAPTER 29 ; UPC 610.1 . 9. NOTE ON PLANS THAT SHOWER AND TUB / SHOWER COMBINATIONS THAT HAVE INDIVIDUAL CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE OF THE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE TYPE. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. THE BATH RECEPTACLE IS CIRCUITED ON CIRCUIT 23, BUT CIRCUIT 23 IS DESCRIBED AS A CIRCUIT SERVING THE EXTERIOR RECEPTACLES. PLEASE CORRECT THE PANEL SCHEDULE'S DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUIT 23. 2. RISER DIAGRAM / E1 ; …."TO ALL IN ONE 100 AMP PANELS". ARE THERE MORE THAN ONE PANELS? IS THIS PANEL BEING UPGRADED TO 200 AMPS? WHY IS 100 AMPS MENTIONED? IECC: 1. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER THE 1998 IECC, OR COMPLY WITH IRC CHAPTER 11. 2. PROVIDE THE WINDOW U- VALUE AND THE R-VALUE OF THE ROOF INSULATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 837-4910 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/05/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |