Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T08CM00922
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/16/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | See comments for Activity #T08OT00312 |
| 06/16/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Comments for Activity #T08OT00312 must be addressed. 1. In the response comments it is stated that a Design Development Option (DDO) application has been submitted. Provide a copy of the approved DDO plans slong with the approval letter. Add the DDO case number to the lower right hand corner of each plan sheet and add a general note indicating the date of approval, what the DDO was for, and any conditions imposed. 2. The tree well detail "H" on sheet C 1.3 indicates a wheel stop is to be placed in front of the planter areas but the site plan and landscape plan do not indicate wheelstops in these areas and show that there is not room to accomodate one. A 2-1/2 foot overhang for vehicles must be provided for vehicle overhang to prevent vehicles from striking and damaging tree trunks. Dimension parking spaces clearly to show how the trees within the planter areas will be protected by curbing and still allow enough length of parking space to accomodate vehicles outside of the PAAL. 3. It is still unclear if this is project is proposed as a condominium plat. Response comment 7 indicates that the landscape border is to be recorded as common area. However, if this is a single parcel and is not being submitted as a plat it is not necessary to record common areas. If this is to be a subdivision plat it must be submitted though the CDRC for review as a plat. Clarify or revise plans if necessary. 4. Changes to the site plan must be reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 06/23/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The revised site drawing shows the rim elevation of the next downstream manhole. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Note that any waste piping from floors located above the floor requiring a backwater valve shall not discharge through the backwater valve. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2008 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/22/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |