Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM00904
Parcel: 12217365A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T08CM00904
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/26/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
06/26/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 26 APRIL 2008
T08CM00904/TMM AND THE ANGEL CAMPUS
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

RESUBMITTAL ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW
I. SHEET CVR-1:
A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY
CORRECTED CV-1 NOT INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL
B. OK, SHOWN ON OTHER DRAWINGS
II. SHEET SD-1:
A. OK
B. OK
C. ACCESSIBLE PARKING:
1. PROVIDE ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES.
NOT SHOWN
2. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE.
DETAIL ON SD-1 SHOWS 1:20, SHOULD BE 1:48
3. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, PRIVATE PROPERTY SIDE WALK RAMPS AND CURB RAMPS AND RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS TO MEET 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS, SECTION 406. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF EACH DIFFERENT TYPE SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER SECTION 406.2
SHOW ALL DETAILS SPECIFIC TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAYOUT, NOT "A" TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUTS.
NORTH PARKING LOT MARKED CROSSING NEEDS DETECTABLE WARNING AT NORTH END
4. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
SHOWN ONLY ON LARGE SCALE PLANS AND AT DETAIL ONE, SYMBOL IS NOT NOTED AND IS IN IMPROPER LOCATION
D. ACCESSIBLE DETAILS:
1. OK.
E. INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 307.4, VERTICAL CLEARANCE AT BOTH STAIRS.
PLEASE NOTE COMPLIANCE ON DRAWING
F. ACCESSIBLE BUILDING EGRESS NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH IBC SECTIONS 1007, 1015, 1019, AND 1105.
PLEASE NOTE COMPLIANCE ON DRAWING
G. PROVIDE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN POLE.
H. REVISE NOTE 1 TO READ ALL PUBLIC R.O.W. RAMPS TO COMPLY WITH DOT 207; ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY RAMPS TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
III. SHEET C2:
A. OK
B. OK
C. OK
D. OK

END OF REVIEW: PLEASE CALL RON BROWN WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS 837-4908
06/26/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/30/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2457.73) is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2458.30). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide a reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly for the water service. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
07/02/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied See previous landscape review comments. No landscape and irrigation plans were included with the resubmittal. In addition to landscape/irrigation plans, provide a response sheet from the first review comments as to how they are being addressed.
07/03/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN NPPO REVIEW Denied See previous native plant preservation review comment. No NPPO Exception application was included with the resubmittal.
07/08/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 8, 2008
SUBJECT: 3127 E Adams
TO: George Holguin - ADC West
LOCATION: 3127 E Adams, T14S, R14E, Section 4, Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM00904 (Second Review)

DATE: May 28, 2008


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.


Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan.

Site Plan:


1. See comments from Ron Brown for all handicap access requirements.
2. Complied
3. Complied
4. Complied
5. Complied
6. Complied
7. Complied
8. Complied
9. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles and provide dimensions on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Provide site visibility triangles for east entrance and for intersection of Adams Street and Country Club. Include both existing and future SVT(s) along Country Club Road.
10. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Per AASHTO requirements - demonstrate on site plan that the minimum passenger car minimum design turning radius have been provided. Minimum design turning raduis is 24' and the minimum inside radius is 13.8'.
11. Complied.
12. Complied
13. See comments from Ron Brown for all handicap access comments.
14. Complied
15. Complied
16. Verify that depressed curbing is provided so that onsite drainage is able to enter landscaped areas. Provide detail for depressed curbing or for weir as indicated on plan. Verify that openings are indicated on both C-2 and SD-2.
17. Call out scupper on site plan.
18. Complied
19. Complied
20. Complied
21. Removed from plan.
22. Complied
23. Complied
24. Complied
25. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
26. Complied
27. Complied
28. Complied
29. Complied
30. Provide phase(s) on site plan.
31. Basins removed - remove any reference to proposed retention basin on site plan.
32. Verify that the information indicated on SD sheet(s) and C sheets match.
33. Submittal indicates that 2 - 6" pipes are proposed. However, theres pipes appear to direct flow to the north. Clarify how outlet drains.
34. Clarify discrepency in labeling of west water harvesting / basin areas and if water harvesting, assure that all sheets match.
35. Explain how positive flow will be achieved. Per spot elevations and elevations of proposed FFE it appears that there will be ponding issues.
36 Extend grading limits indicated on plan to include the area for the proposed bleed pipes.
37. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Drainage Statement:

1. Drainage statement does not indicate how many scuppers need to be installed or the type of scuppers that should be utilized.

2. Discuss maintenance for bleed pipes and indicate where the flow is going. Surrounding spot elevations indicate that the proposed drainage could cause drainage problems for the surrounding buildings.

3. FFE in drainage report do not match what is indicated on site plan and grading site plan.

4. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/17/2008 DELMA ROBEY APPROVAL SHELF Completed
07/17/2008 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/17/2008 DELMA ROBEY REJECT SHELF Completed