Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM00751
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Grant Wilmot Retail T08CM00751 Site Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. Zoning acknowledges the approved Design Development Option (DDO). Once all review comments from all DSD agencies have been addressed the site plan will need to be stamped by the DDO section, Frank Podgorski, prior to approval by zoning. 3. Per D.S. 2-09.5.1.A the 30" dimension between bicycle racks is from the inside of rack to the inside of rack, see Figure 2-09 #9, the dimension shown on the plan is from center of rack to center of rack. 4. Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review once the above comments are addressed. Call or email to schedule an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm00751-3rd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/11/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C. |
| 08/11/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. In situations where the street landscape border is wider than 10' the landscape border needs to be determined for the purpose of calculating the 50% coverage the width is the area between the required screen and the property line. The street landscape border is wider than 10' provide appropriate coverage or revise plan as necessary. 2. Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way LUC 3.7.2.9, if the following requirements are met. "The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide approval for use of ROW. " All vegetation complies with the requirements of LUC 3.7.2.2. " The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. 3. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C. 4. Include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/20/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | Site plan being changed due to change of proposed use. |
| 08/28/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Project has small revision/redesign due to change if use. Will review the new submittal for outstanding comments and new swale. |
| 08/28/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: August 28, 2008 SUBJECT: 6450 E Grant Road- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Rick Engineering Company LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec06, Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00751 (Site Plan) and T08BU00439 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T08CM00751), grading plan (T08BU00439), Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Company, 03MAR08, revised 09MAY08 and 06AUG08) and Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies Inc., 02FEB05 addendum 24APR08 and 19MAY08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the site plan at this time. The grading plan application is still denied at this time until the stamped approved site plan is submitted for review. The Drainage Report was reviewed for site plan and grading plan purposes only. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: New Comment: Engineering acknowledges the approved Design Development Option (DDO). Once all review comments from all DSD agencies have been addressed the site plan will need to be stamped by the DDO section, Frank Podgorski, prior to final approval by Engineering. 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Acknowledged. 9) Acknowledged. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: The project was reviewed for grading plan purposes, however until the DDO and DSD stamped approved site plan is submitted the grading plan could not be shown to be in conformance with an approved plan. The grading plan will be stamped approved once the approved site plan has been submitted. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Provided. However revise the typographical error on Detail L/6 to reference a "Type 2" scupper instead of the Type 5 as shown. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Complied. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Complied. DRAINAGE REPORT: 23) Acknowledged. Due to the Geotechnical Report and the infiltration test provided (shows a drain down time greater than the allowed 12 hours) it will be required that prior to the final grading inspection the basin be scarified and all excess sediment removed so that the basin still has an optimal drain down time (This should take place prior to installation of the required landscaping). 24) Complied. 25) Complied. 26) Complied. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION: 27) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the DDO approved site plan and revised grading plan that address the comments provided above. For expedite purposes the site plan can be reviewed over the counter (DSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. The revised grading plan must be reviewed in house in order to digitize the revised plan and get it to our Records Department. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2008 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |