Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM00702
Parcel: 11506185C

Address:
175 W PLATA ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T08CM00702
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/27/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET 1-SITE PLAN
1. NEED TO PROVIDE IBC 2006/ANSI 117.1 APPROVED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND AN ACCESSIBLE PATH TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE
2. NEED TO PROVIDE IBC 2006/ANSI 117.1 APPROVED ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM THE PUBLIC WAY TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE
3. VERIFY THAT ALL GRADE SLOPES OF ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE AS PER 2006 IBC/ANSI 117.1. PROVIDE SPOTS GRADE AS NECESSARY
4. PROVIDE ALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER 2006 IBC/ANSI 117.1
5. EAST WALL TO BE FIRE RATED AS PER 2006 IBC, TABLE 602
6. NEW BUILDING IS LABELED "STORAGE" BUT HAS AN "F-1" OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. CLARIFY WHICH OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS DESIRED. THIS WILL EFFECT FIRE RATINGS, TOTAL NUMBER OF ALLOWED OCCUPANTS AND NUMBER OF TOILETS AND TOILET FIXTURES.
7. NEED REGISTRANT SEAL, SIGNATURE AND SEAL EXPERATION DATE ON ALL SHEETS.
SHEET 2 - FLOOR PLAN
8. NEED TOILET ROOM PROVIDED FOR EMPLOYEES, REF 2006 IBC, TABLE 2902.1
9. EAST CMU WALL MUST BE FIRE RATED AND MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 30" ABOVE FINISHED ROOF DECK. PROVIDE UL FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY CLASSIFICATION FOR TYPE OF FIRE WALL REQUIRED
10. OBTAIN BUILDING OFFICAL APPROVAL FOR TRUSS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. DO NOT INSTALL TRUSSES WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF SUBMITTALS OF STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEWER.
11. SHOW ROOF DRAIN SCUPPERS/CANALES ON SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
SHEET 3
12. ROOF FRAMING PLAN: FRAMING CONNECTIONS NOTE PER TABLE R602.3 IS NOT ALLOWABLE FOR COMMERICAL CONSTRUCTION DESIGN. ENGINEER OF RECORD MUST DESIGN AND DETAIL ALL CONNECTIONS.
CALCULATION SHEET 3:
13. SHEET 3 FOUNDATION PLAN; VERIFY FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IS 6#6s EACH WAY AS PER CALCULATIONS OR 6#5s EACH WAY PER PLAN.
14. SHEET 4 DETAIL 1, NOTED FOOTING AND REINFORCEMENT IN DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH CALCULATIONS, VERIFY DESIGN.
CALCULATION SHEET 17:
15. SHEET 4 DETAIL 3, VERIFY ANCHOR BOLT SPACING. DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS DIFFER.
16. CALCULATION SHEET 10, SHEET 4, DETAILS 1, 2, 3, AND 6: IS CMU REINFORCEMENT IN TWO FACES? CLARIFY.
GENERAL STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS:
15. NOTE ON ALL PLANS AND DETAILS THAT WALLS ARE 12" CMU.
16. SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PLANS AND CALCULATIONS FOR PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
04/01/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Show the location of the water meter and reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings; indicate the sizes of the meter and assembly. Reference: City of Tucson Ordinance 9976, Backflow Prevention and Cross-connection Control.
04/01/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
3. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
5. Show that the equipment is being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements (e.g. water supply, drain, etc.). Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.
6. Provide guards for equipment located within 10 feet of a roof edge or of a walking surface that is elevated more than 30 inches above the adjoining grade. Reference: Section 304.10, IMC 2006.
7. Show how adequate access is being provided for the equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2006.
8. Provide a mechanical design to indicate how the ductwork will be fabricated and installed. (Note that Chapters 12-24 of the IBC have no bearing on ductwork.) Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
04/01/2008 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 3,165 Square Feet; $5,095.65
04/01/2008 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/01/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plumbing plans for the new work (e.g. yard water piping, water distribution to the evaporative cooler, etc.). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
04/10/2008 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Remove references to the IRC. Plans fall under the jurisdiction of the National Electrical Code (NEC).
2. Provide specifications for the 2 X 4 lighting fixtures.
3. Provide specifications for the AC unit, including electrical requirements.
4. Provide cut sheets for all exterior lighting fixtures.
5. It is not clear from the plans that any of the lighting fixtures are recessed in a ceiling.
6. Exterior fixtures B and C do not appear on this project.
7. Maximum wattage bulb which a fixture may accommodate shall be the basis for lumen counts. Reference Tucson Lighting Code 4.16.2.
8. Demonstrate compliance with the 2006 IECC.
9. Provide location of Panel A on the plans.
10. Provide electrical line diagram.
11. Specify conduit and conductor size and type.
04/22/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 04/22/2008

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
05/01/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 05/28/2008

Development Services Department
Engineering Review Section

Bianca Ramirez, CFM
Engineering Associate

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Engineering but cannot approve without submittal of the last approved site plan.

2. Engineering does not have any forseen problems for approval. Submit last approved site plan with next submittal for approval.

3. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/17/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed
06/05/2008 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed