Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T08CM00621
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/12/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At detail 1/SD-1, locate all accessible parking signage outside the 18' deep required parking dimension. 2. At the Site Plan/SD-2: a. The marked crossing must have detectable warnings at both ends just prior to enntrance to vehicle way PAAL. b. The Accessible route from the curb to the end of the parking spaces at the North end of the marked crossing may have to be concrete. Reference Zoning comments. c. If a 6" high curb is present at the South end of the marked crossing, ramps in accordence with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 405 and/or 406 will have to be provided. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/12/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the approval date to the notes for variance case number C10-08-15. 2. Provide lot combination documents, including combination form and covenant along with recordation receipt. 3. With the above documents and revisions provided, an over the counter Zoning approval may be obtained. When completed, please call Peter McLaughlin at (520) 837-4898 or e-mail peter.mclaughlin@tucsonaz.gov to set up an appointment for approval. |
| 05/15/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/15/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include existing and proposed irrigation system specifications, design, and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A and 2-06.5.4.B. 2. For clarity and legibility revise area of text overstrike where the elevation number is printed over the NPPO statement on the left hand side of sheet LS-1. 3. Label all required perimeter screening on the landscape plan. Indicate clearly the location, height and type of screening material used. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, DS 2-06.3.7.C, DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 4. Dimension the minimum dimensions and label the square footage measured from the inside of tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. The planter area along the east property line does not appear to have a width of at least 4 feet. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e |
| 05/15/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 15, 2009 SUBJECT: 2230 E Speedway Blvd Site Plan- 3rd Engineering Review TO: George Holguin LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec08 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00621 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T08CM00621) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering acknowledges the applicants request that this submittal is primarily to obtain sufficient comments as to satisfy minimum requirements as set by Russlyn Wells for initiating and processing a DDO for a reduction in parking spaces and other related items that may accommodate the existing improvements. At this time the site plan can not be approved as shown. A DDO process may be started for this commercial project, however all comments listed below must be satisfied and shown on the site plan that is submitted for final DDO approval. Engineering can only approve a site plan that has been stamped with the DDO approval. Therefore prior to DDO stamped approval all comments listed below must be shown on the site plan. If the approved DDO site plan does not address the site plan comments the DDO plan will require a revision. 2) Revise the site plan to provide the requested DDO Case Number on the lower right hand corner of the plan sheet along with approval date. 3) Complied 4) Complied 5) Complied 6) Complied 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the location of all scuppers existing/proposed under the sidewalk for roof drainage. Per the proposed site plan not all locations are labeled and there does not seem to be a scupper under the sidewalk along the east side of the "porch" that is attached to the existing office space. Additional Comment: Call out detail and provide detail or Type referring to City of Tucson detail. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 9) Complied 11) Complied 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering areas for the required loading zone that is shown on the east side of the building. Per Zonings comment the required loading zone must be larger. Verify that loading trucks can maneuver into this area. Per the site plan it shows a 9-foot area adjacent to the loading area, it may be possible to revise this dimension to keep the required 5-foot pedestrian circulation area, provide for the loading zone space and then be able to revise the curbing adjacent to the parking spaces so that vehicles can access this area. Verify that the revised location does not interrupt the parking requirements. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. All radii must be shown to scale. Additional Comment: Please label radii on plan view for further review. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the Improvement Plan reference for the existing catch basin and storm drain located along Speedway Blvd. All existing drainage improvements that are shown on the site plan must have the referenced improvement plan for site verification. Additional Comment: Call out improvement plan number or provide note referencing improvement plan number. 14) Complied 15) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the shown right-of-way for Speedway Blvd as existing and/or future. Verify the MS&R future right-of-way width. Additional Comment: Verify the MS&R future right-of-way width and label both existing/future if they are the same for both existing and future. If not label each accordingly. 16) Complied 17) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. * Please note that this is a standard comment - response not necessary. Just information in the event the information is needed. 18) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4928. Bianca Ramirez, CFM Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 06/03/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |