Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM00528
Parcel: 140411000

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T08CM00528
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/05/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 6 MAY 2008
T08CM00528/ROCKEFELLER GROUP INDUSTRIAL PARK
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

I. SHEET 1 of 9
A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS.
B. SHOW ALL R.O.W. CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN WALK WAYS AND CURB RAMPS AT ALL DRIVE ENTRANCES AND STREET CORNER CURBS.
C. NOT USED
D. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402.
1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT.
II. SHEET 2 of 9:
A. DENOTE 7' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE TO BOTTOM OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN.
B. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF INTERIOR CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406.
C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF R.O.W. CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207.
III. SHEET 3 of 9:
A. AT MOST NORTH EASTERLY MARKED CROSSING, RELOCATE DETECTABLE WARNING FROM SIDE WALK RAMP LANDING TO END OF PARKING AISLE ADJACENT TO THE PAAL.
a. AT THE MOST NORTHERLY END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, REFERENCE NOTE 27
B. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402.
1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT.
C. AT NOTES 4 AND 27, CHANGE "SD 207" TO 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406.
D. LOCATE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SIGN AS PER LARGE SCALE DETAIL ON SHEET 2 OF 9. LOCATE AND NOTE ALL REQUIRED "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACES ON SITE PLANS.
IV. SHEETS 4 AND 5 of 9:
A. DITTO ITEMS IIIB, IIIC AND IIID ABOVE
B.
V. SHEETS 6, 7 AND 8 of 9:
A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402.
1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTIONS 403.3 AND 502.5
2. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT.
END OF REVIEW
05/08/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T08CM00528
6850 S Brosious Avenue
Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/26/08

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 A search of the Pima County Assessors records indicates several tax parcels make up the two separate properties. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and record a covenant regarding development and use of real property for each property. Provide the recordation information (docket and page) for the covenants on the site plan. Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html

2. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide a dimensioned detail of the class one bicycle parking locker.

3. Provide maneuverability for the trash enclosures. The fence behind the trash enclosures south of building 3 appears to limit maneuverability. See engineering comments.

4. The referenced permit number located in the lower right corner is not correct. The correct number is T08CM00528.

5. The above comments can be reviewed over the counter by setting an appointment with me.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00528-2.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
05/12/2008 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. For each tree required by the LUC, a planter area with a minimum unpaved area of 34 square feet and a four 4 foot minimum width are required. Include dimensions of diamond shaped planters within vehicle use area.

2. Note: The required screen along a street frontage for vehicular use and outdoor display areas may be lowered to thirty (30) inches if the site is located across the street from non-residential uses or unimproved, non-residentially zoned parcels

3. NPPO application for Exception is currently under review additional comments may apply
05/13/2008 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied NPPO application for Exception is currently under review additional comments may apply.
05/30/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manholes for each of the three buildings. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide the sizes of the sections of the public sewer to which the private sewer systems will be connected. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. A separate permit from the City of Tucson along with an authorization to construct from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality is required for the installation of manholes for a private sewer collection system. Reference: Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code.
06/19/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 19, 2008
SUBJECT: 6850 S Brosius Site Plan- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Rick Engineering Company ATTN: Dan Castro
LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec16, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08CM00528 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T08CM00528), Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Company, 14FEB08 revised 01MAY08), and Geotechnical Exploration Report (GEC, 08APR08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for site plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Revise the site plan to correctly show the site plan reference number that has been assigned to this project, T08CM00528. The referenced number shown on the proposed site plan is incorrect, revise.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.7: DSD acknowledges that a lot combination is in process. The lot combination is required prior to site plan approval. The lot combination must be recorded and approved by the Zoning Department.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to provide sight visibility triangles (SVTs) at all intersections of public roadways, i.e. Lisa Frank to Elvira etc. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 for SVT procedures and criteria. The dimensions for the SVTs should reflect Local to Local Street dimensions at these intersections.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label and dimension all drainage infrastructure locations per the submitted Drainage Report. Verify that all drainage improvements that are within the Drainage Report are clearly labeled with details and dimensions on the revised site plan. Specifically:

a) Provide a revised site plan, plan view and details (Sheet 9), to verify that all scupper openings meet the minimum opening requirements as shown in the tables on Figure 5 of the Drainage Report.

b) Revise Sheet 3 of the site plan to clearly label the 15-foot curb opening (provide keynote for the associated detail) for the inlet to Basin 1P.

c) Revise Sheet 3 of the site plan to label and dimension the proposed (2)-12 inch CMPs in plan view as shown in Figure 5 and on the conceptual grading plan.

d) Clarify on Sheet 4 of the site plan that the 15-foot wide access ramp into Basin 4P is accessible from the proposed 15-foot depressed curb opening. Verify that maintenance vehicles can access the ramp without driving over a curb or on a basin side slope.

e) Revise Sheet 5 of the site plan to clearly label the proposed scupper location per the Drainage Report at concentration point 3P.2. Verify that the scupper openings meet the minimum opening width requirements per the Drainage Report.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: It is acknowledge that the truck wells are using a trench drain system to divert stormwater runoff into a sump area and then be pumped out into the landscaping. For site plan purposes the location of these improvements will work, however during grading plan submittal a detail must be provided showing how these areas are to function.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise Detail E to correctly label the minimum 5-inch thick concrete, 300 psi minimum for the proposed refuse container. Verify that all labels and dimensions shown in Figure 3, DS Sec.6-01 for refuse container are provided on the detail or in plan view.

7) Ds Sec.10-02.14.3.3: Revise the site plan to clarify the required maintenance access ramps that are proposed into the basins. Revise the site plan sheets to clearly label the maximum 15 % slope for all ramps along with the minimum 15-foot width for the ramps. These are not clear or are missing on the site plan.

8) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the site plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, detention/retention basins, and associated erosion protection. Provide cross-sections on the site plan for all property boundaries and at all proposed basin locations that shows the limits of grading and the required 2-feet setback from property line. This comment was not clearly addressed, no cross sections are shown and the site plan does not label a minimum 2-foot setback from property lines to limits of grading around the proposed project.

9) Per Division Directive the site plan must label and dimension the required basin bleeder pipe that is required at the outlet to Basin 1P to ensure positive drainage (per the spot elevation provided al other basins are not required to have a low flow bleeder pipe with the exception of Basin 1P. Provide the location and dimensions of the bleeder pipe in the detail for the basin 1P (minimum pipe size allowed I s12-inches, an orifice plate may be used on the upstream end to reduce flow if desired.

10) DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1: Revise Basin 1P and the proposed retaining wall so that the retaining wall does not occupy more than 35% of the basin perimeter. If more than 35% of the side slope for the basin is constructed out of retaining walls the excess area must provide an alternate design that meets the basin configuration standards, such as a retaining wall system design that provides positive drainage away from the retaining system where an earthen slope is constructed on the inside of the basin wall to prevent ponding of water along the retaining wall. Verify that the basin still meets the detention/retention volume requirements.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.2.B: Revise the phase line shown on Sheet 1 and Sheet 4 of the proposed site plan. All drainage improvements (i.e. basin side slopes, storm drain pipes, outlets, scuppers, etc must be constructed with phases 1. Specifically the northern side slope of Basin 4P must be constructed under phase 1 to assure a complete basin design that will not fail during a rain event if Phase 2 is not complete.

12) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications:

a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html /

b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php

c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w.

13) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan and geotechnical report.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

14) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a revised geotechnical report or addendum that addresses the following:

a) Soils report should provide any recommendation for setbacks from the buildings to the proposed retention/detention basins, water harvesting basins and constructed channels.

b) Provide slope stability recommendations for all proposed constructed slopes.


GRADING PLAN:

15) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit application (T08BU00855) has been submitted for this project and comments will be provided under separate letter. The grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval.

16) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf

17) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be reviewed with the grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan and geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and geotechnical report reviews.

If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/24/2008 GERARDO BONILLA APPROVAL SHELF Completed
06/24/2008 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/24/2008 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed