Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T08CM00528
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/26/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM00528 6850 S Brosious Avenue Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/26/08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 A search of the Pima County Assessors records indicates several tax parcels make up the two separate properties. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and record a covenant regarding development and use of real property for each property. Provide the recordation information (docket and page) for the covenants on the site plan. Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html 2. DS 2-02.2.1.4 On the location map indicate the names of the streets surrounding the project. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.8 The building square footage indicated in the notes and calculations portion of sheet 1 of 8, note #2, does not match the total building square footage in note #3 and does not match the building square footage used for the parking calculations. Clarify. In the notes and calculations, note #6, for building #3, the parking ratio for general manufacturing is indicated as 1:5000, the correct ratio is 1:500. Revise. In the notes and calculations, note #6, for building #2, the provided number of parking spaces is indicated as 97. A count of the parking spaces indicated on the plan is 101. Revise note. The increase in number of provided parking spaces will require an increase in the number of required handicap parking spaces. Per IBC Sec. 1106.1 the number of required handicap parking spaces when 101 parking spaces are provided is 5. Revise plan and notes. Per DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 when the side of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over 6" in height, the required width for the space is 10' to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. The parking space adjacent to the trash enclosure at the southwest corner of the north property will be required to be 10' in width, provide dimension. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Per DS 2-09.4.3 Bicycle parking facilities will be separated from vehicular use areas by a barrier or sufficient distance to prevent damage to the parked bicycles. The class one spaces located along the south side of building 3 and the class one spaces located in the loading zones of buildings 1 and 2 do not appear to meet this requirement. On detail A on sheet 2 of 8 the class one bicycle lockers indicated do not meet the requirements of DS 2-09.5.5 which states that class one bicycle parking requires shade protection. Clearly indicate type of material used to provide shade protection. On sheet 5 of 8, the keynote indicator for the class 2 bicycle parking spaces in front of building #1 is in correct. Shown as #6, should be #9. Revise. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Per DS 3-05.2.2.D a backup spur is required at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The parking space located at the south side of building #3 near the center of the building is adjacent to a fence and will require a backup spur or redesign of this area. The backup spur located at the south end of the parking lot for building #2 is required to have a minimum 3' clear area behind the backup spur per DS 3-05.2.2.D. Provide dimension. Clearly indicate the minimum two way PAAL width of 24' for access to the parking spaces located within the fenced areas along the south side of building #3. The 24' required width cannot include the loading zones with in this area. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Per DS 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required with in a development. This path must connect to all public access areas if the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. The above comment applies to the south property in regards to the circulation path is missing between the two buildings and is not connected to the pedestrian circulation paths on Elvira Rd nor to Aragon Rd. The above comment applies to the north property in regards to the pedestrian circulation path does not connect to Aragon Rd. Per DS 2-08.4.1 a 4' sidewalk is required between parking spaces and a building. The parking spaces along the south side of building #3 in the fenced area do not meet this requirement. Clearly indicate where the sidewalk connects to each of the buildings. Indicate the main entrance for each building. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide proposed lighting lay out and type. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.28 Provide the zoning of the property across the street from building 1 on sheet 5 of 8. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.13 Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00528.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 02/27/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments. |
| 02/29/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Provide approval documentation for use of the ROW. 2. In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is encroachment into the right-of-way as per Sec. 2-06.3.4.C.1. Portions of the buffers are wider than 10' revise plan as necessary. 3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening element along Lisa Frank Ave. 4. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from entire street frontages except for points of ingress-egress per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise plan as necessary. 5. Note: All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas (including bottom of basins) not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, re-seeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify the locations of proposed for inert ground cover materials or seeded areas per LUC 3.7.2.7. & DS 2-06.5.2.C. 6. The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. 7. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Additional tree is required for north vehicle use area. 8. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary per DS 2-15.2.0.C 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/29/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 03/18/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 18, 2008 SUBJECT: 6850 S Brosius Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: Rick Engineering Company ATTN: Dan Castro LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec16, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00528 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T08CM00528) and Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Company, 14FEB08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for site plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the location map on Sheet 1 to provide for conditions within the square mile area shown such as the streets surrounding the subject parcels. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.7: A lot combination is required prior to site plan approval. The lot combination must be recorded and approved by the Zoning Department prior to site plan approval. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show the minimum unobstructed radius of 5-feet that is required at all PAAL intersection and 18-feet where the PAALs are being used as access for fire lanes. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b for PAAL requirements. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide dimensions for all required back-up spur with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced area. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to meet the requirements within DS Sec.3-05.2.1.B.3. Per this section when the side of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over 6" in height, the required width for the space is 10' to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. The parking space adjacent to the trash enclosure at the southwest corner of the north property will be required to be 10' in width, clarify. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise (label and dimension) the proposed sight visibility triangles (SVTs) shown in plan view for all PAAL access points. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 for SVT procedures and criteria. The dimensions for the SVT's should reflect a PAAL to Local Street dimensions. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Label and dimension all setback requirements for all proposed points of egress and ingress for the subject parcel. Refer to the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for all driveway setback requirements. Specifically the setback from the driveway to existing roads, fire hydrants, telephone and electric poles, etc. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Verify the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of all roads that are adjacent to the subject property. All new development shall provide 5-foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. If sidewalks already exist along the frontage of Elvira Road, Lisa Frank Avenue, Aragon Road, Medina Road, and Brosius Avenue provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required from all proposed buildings to the required pedestrian circulation path located along Elvira Road and Aragon Road. Specifically for the vehicular use area between Building 1 and Building 2. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and any necessary changes to the Drainage Report to label and dimension all drainage infrastructure locations for the proposed curb openings, scupper locations, storm grate locations and basin weirs for design purposes. Verify that all drainage improvements that are within the Drainage Report are clearly labeled with details and dimensions on the revised site plan. Figure 5 of the Drainage Report calls out weir locations for all 3 basins, however review of the site plan does not show these locations, revise. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to show the ponding limits for the proposed drainage swales located within the truck wells in the loading zone area. Provide in plan view spot elevations to show how the water is drained away from the building and into an associated storm grate or detention/retention basin. Provide spot elevations showing positive drainage away from the truck wells so that ponding does not occur in this localized water shed. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the retention/detention volumes on the site plan to match the volume references in the proposed Drainage Report. The volumes shown on the site plan need to be in the same format as called out in the Drainage Report for easier review. All basin side slopes must meet the recommendations within the required geotechnical report. If the basin design falls under the requirements in DS Sec.10-01.3.6.2 safety barriers will be required, verify. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the recordation information for all shown right-of-way widths for all roads adjacent to the subject parcel. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all easements of record are graphically shown on the proposed site plan along with the recordation information. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the detail to correctly dimensions the proposed refuse container. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3 for refuse container requirements. 16) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the SVTs that are shown on the revised site plan. Provide a note on the landscape plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas that obstructs sight visibility. 17) Ds Sec.10-02.14.3.3: Revise the site plan to provide for the required maintenance access ramp into all proposed basin. A minimum 15-foot wide vehicular access ramp with a maximum 15 % slope is required into the basins; verify that the landscape plans do not interfere with the required 15-foot access ramp. 18) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the site plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, detention/retention basins, and associated erosion protection. Provide cross-sections on the site plan for all property boundaries and at all proposed basin locations that shows the limits of grading and the required 2-feet setback from property line. 19) Per Division Directive and the proposed Drainage Report the site plan must label and dimension all basin outlets and bleeder pipes that are required at the basin outlets to ensure positive drainage. Provide the location and dimensions of the bleeder pipe in the detail for the basins. All basins must be designed to eliminate standing water and mosquito infestation. Infiltration test will be required prior to site plan approval to ensure that the Basin drains within the 12-hour requirement. 20) DS Sec.2-02.2.2.B: Clearly indicate on the site plan which portions will be constructed in phases, in conjunction with other major activities. Show Phase numbers and clearly delineate. Each phase must function independent of future phases, provide development calculations for each phase. 21) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 22) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan, Drainage Report and geotechnical report. DRAINAGE REPORT: 23) Revise the Drainage Report and any necessary changes to the site plan to show all curb opening, scupper locations, storm grate locations and basin weirs for design purposes. Verify that all drainage improvements that are within the Drainage Report show up on the revised site plan. Figure 5 of the Drainage Report calls out weir locations for all 3 basins, however review of the site plan did not show these locations, revise. 24) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide a geotechnical report with building setbacks from the proposed basins, infiltration rates for the retention basin, and slope stability recommendations for basin/channel design along with slope stability for any other constructed slopes. Clarify if the Drainage Report and site plan match the geotechnical report. 25) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.C: Revise the Drainage Report with hydraulic calculation sheets to show the ponding limits for the proposed drainage swales located within the truck wells in the loading zone area. Provide in plan view spot elevations to show how the water is drained away from the building and into an associated storm grate or detention/retention basin. Provide spot elevations showing positive drainage away from the truck wells so that ponding does not occur in this localized water shed. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 26) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a geotechnical report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from the buildings to the proposed retention/detention basins, water harvesting basins and constructed channels. b) Provide slope stability recommendations for all proposed constructed slopes. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. d) Provide percolation rates for retention/detention basins for 5-year threshold retention. GRADING PLAN: 27) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project due to the cut and fill quantities provided on the site plan. Fill quantities shown exceed the 50 cubic yards so a grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after site plan approval and prior to any construction activity. 28) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 29) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a General Note stating that all CMU walls and retaining walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments. 30) Provide a general note on the grading plan to state the following; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html " 31) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical engineering report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report reviews. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/02/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |