Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T08CM00497
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 30 APRIL 2008 T08CM00497/BALBOA DUPLEXES REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: 2) DS Sec. 2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a detail on the site plan to dimension all parking spaces proposed including the required handicap spaces. Refer to DS Sec. 3-05 for further clarification on parking requirements. 9) DS Sec. 2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to provide a detail for all proposed handicap access ramp. Revise the plan to show that all proposed handicap access ramps meet the design requirements per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. Provide details or keynotes that clearly indicating slope, width, location of truncated domes, landing, etc. The site plan must clearly show all handicap ramp locations, clarify. 12) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable, provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 30 APRIL NEW COMMENTS 1. IN ORDER TO MAKE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES MORE USER FRIENDLY TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, ON 16 OCTOBER 2007, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "THE INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN ORDINANCE". TO MAINTAIN THE SPRIT AND INTENT OF THIS ORDINANCE AND TO RETAIN FULL ACCESSIBILITY APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT, ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL SHOWING ALL ELEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS. a. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL INCLUDING VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN AS REQUIRED. PREVIOUS COMMENT 19) DS Sec. 2-01.2.1.A.23: Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and Page number. Label the contour intervals used and the bench mark information for the shown topography lines. 30 APRIL NEW COMMENTS 2. PROVIDE SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG THE ENTIRE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 3. ALL ACCESSIBLE RAMPS REQUIRED AT THE DRIVE ENTRANCE FROM BALBOA AV. IS IN THE R.O.W. AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL TDOT STANDARD DETAILS 207. REFERENCE DRAWINGS TO THAT EFFECT. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/30/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Balboa Duplexes T08CM00497 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 30, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2) This comment was not fully addressed. The detail must include; materials for lighting, and a fully dimensioned layout. Review D.S. 2-09.5 and provide all required dimensions on a plan view. Remove the reference to "POLE" from keynote 16. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Provide a Class 2 off-street bicycle parking detail; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. Review revised D.S. 2-09 as a Pole bicycle rack is no longer acceptable. 3) In your response to zoning comments 12 & 14 you reference "SITE PLAN NOTE #7". Zoning was not able to find "SITE PLAN NOTE #7", please clarify. 4) Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide an over the counter review. Please call or email to schedule an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t08cm00497-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/07/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include the height of CMU wall and reference point for measurement per DS 2-07.2.2.A.3.b. 2. Canopy trees planted within and adjacent to vehicular use areas shall be planted in a manner which will afford the greatest amount of shade to the paved areas per DS 2-06.3.3.D. Parking spaces to the Northwest require an additional tree. 3. The site does contain protected native plants. Verify that development will not substantially impact protected species or submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan with information according to the preservation and mitigation methodology chosen per DS 2-15.0 & LUC 3.8.4. 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/08/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The site does contain protected native plants. Verify that development will not substantially impact protected species or submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan with information according to the preservation and mitigation methodology chosen per DS 2-15.0 & LUC 3.8.4. |
| 06/13/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 18, 2008 SUBJECT: 3037 N Balboa Ave Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: John Feneck LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec36 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00497 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T08CM00497) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: Engineering Division has reviewed this project for conformance with the Development Standards (DS) and Land Use Code (LUC). More specifically DS Sec.2-02, 3-05, 6-01, and Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code. 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the location of all proposed scuppers under the sidewalk. Keynote #20 needs to be shown at all scupper locations. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Keynote #2 labels the sidewalk as 4-feet unless otherwise noted (sidewalk along the street frontage), however a reference to a Standard Public Improvement Detail for the sidewalk construction is required. 3) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.23: Provide the Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and Page number for the topographic contours that are shown. 4) Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 5) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 6) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. For expedite purposes the site plan can be reviewed over the counter (DSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. The applicant must set up a meeting beforehand if an over the counter approval is requested. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |