Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T08CM00405
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 5 MAY 2008 T08CM00405/SAGUARO VISTA SHOPPING CENTER REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 6: A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. B. DETAIL F:CHANGE NOTE REFERENCE FROM SD 207 TO ICC 117.1, SECTION 405 AND 406 C. DETAIL C: PLAN SHOWING TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 1. ONE OF THESE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE "VAN ACCESSIBLE". IDENTIFY SUCH. USE 8' WIDE AISLE FOR 8' WIDE VAN SPACE OR 5' AISLE AND 11' VAN SPACE; 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.2. 2. DETECTABLE WARNING TO BE 2' DEEP; ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.12. 3. CHANGE NOTE REFERENCE FROM SD 207 TO ICC 117.1, SECTION 405 AND 406 II. SHEET 2 of 6: A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTIONS 403.3 AND 502.5 B. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF CURB/SIDE WALK RAMPS WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE COMPLYING WITH ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406 C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF R.O.W. CURBS COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207. III. SHEETS 3 AND 4 of 6: A. DITTO ITEM II ABOVE END OF REVIEW |
| 05/12/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM00405 7760 E. Speedway Blvd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/14/08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 Provide the legal description of the parcel being developed. The lot split (reconfiguration) must be approved by the City of Tucson and completed before approval of this site plan. Provide on the site plan the case number of the lot split in the lower right corner near the title block. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.8 The reconfigured parking spaces at the southwest corner of the shopping center do not meet the requirements of DS 3-01 and DS 3-05. Clearly indicate the minimum 24' PAAL width behind the 90 degree parking spaces and between the curb islands. Clearly indicate that these parking spaces meet the minimum requirements for size of a standard parking space. Provide a dimensioned detail of the parallel parking spaces located along the west and south side of the shopping center. The parking spaces when adjacent to a barrier in excess of 6" require the parking space to be a minimum of 10' in width. It appears the parking spaces along the west property line are adjacent to a wall. Provide the width of the PAALs in both of these areas. The southern most parallel parking spaces along the west side of the property appear to interfere with the maneuverability for the trash enclosure located south of these parking spaces. Contact engineering for the clearance required. A van accessible parking space is required for the new buildings. See HC comments. The areas of the shopping center where the parking spaces are being reconfigured are required to be clearly indicated that a change is being done. (cloud the areas being changed) 3. DS 2-02.2.1.9 On page 3 of 6 the class 2 bicycle parking spaces are indicated as class 1 and the class 1 spaces are indicated as class 2. Revise callout. In the bicycle parking calculations there are 4 new class 1 bicycle parking spaces indicated. The plan indicates only two new class 1 spaces being provided. Clarify. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.11 The 24' PAAL located along the west side of the proposed buildings is required to have a 2' minimum clearance along the west side of the PAAL. See DS 3-05.2.2.B.3. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Provide a pedestrian circulation path connecting to the trash enclosure. See DS 2-08.3.1. The pedestrian path provided cannot cross the drive through lane. See DS 2-08.2.1.C.a. Addition of the parallel parking spaces along the west side of the property will then cause a pedestrian refuge being required along the west side of the "small stores" building. Minimum width of a pedestrian refuge area is 5 feet. See DS 3-05.2.2.B.1. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.14 The loading zone as provided on the site plan can be approved. There may be further options available which may be a help in the overall design. Please set an appointment with me and David Rivera to discuss options. 7. DS 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide the percentage of building area expansion. The expansion calculations required are cumulative for all previous expansions and this expansion. Revise. 8. Because of the many issues involved with this project I would be available to discuss the issues. Please call and set an appointment with me. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00405-2.doc |
| 05/14/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Revise plans accordingly. NOTE: Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. If providing up to five-foot of the required 10-foot street landscape border within the MS&R right-of-way, provide documentation indicating approval. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 2. Indicate required screening on the plan. A 3-foot screen along the development side of the street landscape border adjacent to the MS&R right-of-way, and a 6-foot masonry screen wall to screen the loading zone from the street, are required per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3. Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C |
| 06/13/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 16, 2008 SUBJECT: 7760 E Speedway Blvd Site Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Olsson Associates Attn: Richard G. Macias, P.E. LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec08 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08CM00405 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T08CM00405) (Drainage Statement (Olsson Associates, 28JAN08) that was submitted on the 1st review was not included with the 2nd submittal, provide all information that is associated with the design of this project) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Title 4 Chapter 30 R4-30-304.E.4: Revise the site plan sheets to provide the expiration date for the seal of the engineer of record. Per the referenced section; "All original documents should include a notation beneath the seal either written, typed, or electronically generated that provides the day, month, and year of expiration of current registration, as shown in Appendix B. (Effective 3/08/08)." 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide the recordation information with the COT approved lot reconfiguration for the subject parcel. The Zoning Department prior to site plan approval must approve all lot reconfiguration. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly show the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths at all locations. Specifically the re-striping and revised vehicular use area in the southwest corner of the site. All PAALs used for 2-way traffic must be a minimum of 24-feet. Revise and provide the 24-foot dimension at all PAAL areas. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan and the areas of the shopping center where the parking spaces and vehicular use area are being reconfigured. Clearly indicate all areas of proposed improvements (box/cloud the areas being revised). 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to clearly show the required 24-foot PAAL width at the refuse container location located on the southeast corner of Building 1. Per the Development Standards the 24-foot PAAL width can not be obstructed by the refuse container doors, revise. 6) DS Sec.2-02.1.A.8: Revise the 24-foot PAAL located along the west side of the proposed buildings. Per DS Sec.3-05.2.2.B.3 a minimum distance of 2-feet (26-feet total PAAL width) must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen or other obstruction. 7) DS Sec.2-02.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide a dimensioned detail of the parallel parking spaces located along the west and south side of the shopping center. The parking spaces when adjacent to a barrier in excess of 6" require the parking space to be a minimum of 10-feet in width. It appears the parking spaces along the west property line are adjacent to a wall, clarify. Provide the width of the PAALs in both of these areas. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension all onsite pedestrian circulation areas. A minimum 5-foot pedestrian circulation is required along the west side of the existing building ("Small Stores") due to the proposed parallel parking spaces along the west property line, revise. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and Note # 8 to include verbiage that "all down spout locations must be designed to convey the 10-year flow under the pedestrian circulation." 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to clearly label the proposed pedestrian circulation path from the proposed building to the refuse enclosure. 12) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.17: A Grading Permit application will be required due to the cut and fill quantities shown on the site plan. A grading permit can not be approved prior to site plan approval, but is required prior to any construction activity. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Show maneuverability (label and dimension turning radii in plan view) for refuse vehicles in plan view. Revise the site plan to provide for the 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach that is required for the refuse vehicle. The proposed parallel parking space along the west property line encroaches into the required approach, revise. 14) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 15) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and the Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 06/20/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/20/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |