Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T08CM00028
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | NPPO needs to review when returned |
| 03/28/2008 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | DEQ: NEED DESIGN & FEE FOR SEPTIC REVIEW |
| 04/15/2008 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T08CM00028 4/18/08 1755 M. HOUGHTON RD. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2006 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. ARS 32 - 144 PARAGRAPH 4 LIMITS NON-REGISTRANTS TO A MAXIMUM OF 3000 SQUARE FEET. PLEASE CONSULT A REGISTERED ARCHITECT FOR THIS HOUSE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 837-4910 |
| 04/21/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T08CM00028 1755 N. Houghton Rd. Site Plan - New SFR TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4-21-08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. None of the following comments have been addressed. Make corrections and resubmit. 1. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Scenic Corridor overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf 2. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf. Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in DS 9-06.0. A mitigation plan as required in LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5.D must be provided. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5 and 2.8.6.6 are met. All applications for ERZ shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Advisory Committee, which will make recommendations on the application to the DSD Director. 3. The Overlay Zone case numbers must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the site plan. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc.) and ERZ as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plans must be added to the site plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The site plan may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) Please add the four hundred (400) foot SCZ corridor boundary to site plan. The site plan currently shows this as two hundred (200) feet Please correct. 4. Zoning acknowledges that there is a subdivision plat in review for this area at this time which has not been approved as of this review. The indicated cul-de-sac should be indicated as future. The dashed property lines should be indicated as future. Clearly indicate the entire driveway connecting to the south. Indicate all easements on the property as well as the ingress/egress easement located to the south of the property. Part of the easement to the south curves onto this property. FYI: If this structure does not meet the setback requirements of the submitted subdivision plat at time of approval, a Design Development Option may be required. 5. Indicate the maximum allowed height of the structure (max. 24' in a SCZ) and the proposed height of the structure. 6. Indicate the zoning of the surrounding properties on the site plan. 7. A revised plat may be required in order to revise grading limits. See engineering comments. 8. Clearly indicate floodplain limits. See engineering comments. 9. Remove key notes 1, 2, and 3 regarding setbacks, they are not correct. Provide dimension from the east side of the structure to the east property line. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00028-2.doc |
| 05/30/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | See previous comments. Provide evidence that dumped debris has been removed from the wash and wash area. |