Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08CM00028
Parcel: 99999999A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM

Permit Number - T08CM00028
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/28/2008 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Applicants proposing a project within SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) LUC 2.8.2 must be reviewed in compliance with the DSD - Full Notice Procedure, Sec.23A-50 and 23A-51. (Ord. No. 9967, §2, 7/1/04). Contact Patricia Gehlen 837-4919 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process.

2. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews
02/01/2008 SEPTIC APPROVAL WWM REVIEW Denied DEQ: NEED DESIGN & FEE FOR SEPTIC REVIEW
02/20/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T08CM00028
1755 N. Houghton Rd.
Site Plan - New SFR

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2-21-08

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Scenic Corridor overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf

2. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf. Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in DS 9-06.0. A mitigation plan as required in LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5.D must be provided. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5 and 2.8.6.6 are met. All applications for ERZ shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Advisory Committee, which will make recommendations on the application to the DSD Director.

3. The Overlay Zone case numbers must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the site plan. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc.) and ERZ as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plans must be added to the site plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The site plan may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04)

Please add the four hundred (400) foot SCZ corridor boundary to site plan. The site plan currently shows this as two hundred (200) feet Please correct.

4. Zoning acknowledges that there is a subdivision plat in review for this area at this time which has not been approved as of this review. The indicated cul-de-sac should be indicated as future. The dashed property lines should be indicated as future. Clearly indicate the entire driveway connecting to the south.
Indicate all easements on the property as well as the ingress/egress easement located to the south of the property. Part of the easement to the south curves onto this property.

FYI: If this structure does not meet the setback requirements of the submitted subdivision plat at time of approval, a Design Development Option may be required.

5. Indicate the maximum allowed height of the structure (max. 24' in a SCZ) and the proposed height of the structure.

6. Indicate the zoning of the surrounding properties on the site plan.

7. A revised plat may be required in order to revise grading limits. See engineering comments.

8. Clearly indicate floodplain limits. See engineering comments.

9. Remove key notes 1, 2, and 3 regarding setbacks, they are not correct. Provide dimension from the east side of the structure to the east property line.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00028.doc
02/26/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Troy Williams DATE: February 27, 2008
4561 W. Annabell Street
Tucson, Arizona 85741

SUBJECT: Single Family Residence, 1755 N. Houghton Road
Site plan T08CM00028 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 02

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. The applicant's proposed project is also included in a tentative plat (lot 1) currently under review with the City of Tucson staff. The City of Tucson can not accept the wildcat dumping along the South bank of the Agua Caliente wash as 100-year bank protection. As a comment on the tentative plat, the City of Tucson does not have any engineering reports and/or plans to verify the proper construction of any bank protection adjacent to the project. Therefore the City of Tucson cannot consider the wildcat dumping as proper bank protection. The Site cannot be approved prior to the addressing of the current violation on the lot for illegal dumping in the floodplain.
3. Add note: "Drainage patterns shall not be altered and remain the same".
4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. The driveway for the SFR must be located on the South side of the property since the future road has not been built.
6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. For the entire lot.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
10. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
11. Show COT activity number (T08CM00028) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
12. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
13. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
14. "A grading permit may be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Statement:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS.
2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. Show the project address or administration address and the City of Tucson activity number on the cover sheet of the DS

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:\1755 N. Houghton Rd._Site
02/26/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The Notice of Violation (T06VL00120) on Parcel 133-03-283E for stockpile of material along the Agua Caliente Wash per Tucson City Code Chapter 11 Sections 58 and 59 and per D.S. 11-01.21 A & B and 11-01.8 was sent be certified mail on 03/06/07. A copy of the violation can be obtained from the Inspection office at 791-5550 x2101 or x2104.

Paul Machado
DSD/COT
02/26/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Troy Williams DATE: March 11, 2008
4561 W. Annabell Street
Tucson, Arizona 85741

SUBJECT: Single Family Residence, 1755 N. Houghton Road (Supplement comments)
Site plan T08CM00028 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 02

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. The lot lines, cul-de-sac or any part of the "La Mariposa" subdivision shown shall are not valid and cannot be used on the SFR site plan until the subdivision has been approved and platted. The lot lines, cul-de-sac or any part of the "La Mariposa" subdivision can be shown only as a future project and only depicted by dashed lines. Revise as required.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:\1755 N. Houghton Rd._Site_supplement.doc
02/27/2008 DAVE WITT BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T08CM00028

3/7/08 1755 N. HOUGHTON RD.

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2006 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.

2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.

SITE PLAN:

1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETED SITE PLAN.

2. PLEASE REMOVE "MARANA". TUCSON?

FOUNDATION PLANS:

1. THE 2" STEP FROM THE PORCHES TO THE LIVING AREA APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN. HOW WILL THE TRANSITION BE ACHIEVED?

2. PLEASE CHECK THE SIZE OF THE PORCH FOOTINGS AT THE BIG PORCH.

3. WILL THE FIREPLACE BE MASONRY? FOOTING? ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE FIREPLACE.

FLOOR PLANS:

1. NOTE THAT BATHTUB AND SHOWER ENCLOSURES SHALL BE FINISHED PER p2710 WITH CERAMIC TILE, OR A
LISTED ENCLOSURE, TO A HEIGHT OF 72" ABOVE THE DRAIN PER R702.4 AND R307.2

2. FIREPLACES: - INDICATE FIREPLACE LOCATION, HEARTH SIZE AND MATERIALS, PER R1003.10 OR R1004.2
- FOR FACTORY BUILT OR ZERO CLEARANCE FIREPLACES, FOR MASONRY FIREPLACES, SHOW CROSS-SECTION.

3. LOCATE AND IDENTIFY SHEAR WALL TYPES AND LOCATIONS. PROVIDE NAILING SCHEDULE AND HOLD-DOWNS FOR THE ALTERNATE BRACED WALL PANELS.

4. PLEASE SPECIFY DOOR HARDWARE CONSISTENT WITH THE "INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN".

5. PLEASE SPECIFY THE DOOR HARDWARE. INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN 404.2.7 .

6. BLOCK FOR GRAB BARS. INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN 604.5, 607.4, 607.4.1.1, 607.4.2.1, 609.4, etc.
STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE CHECK THE 3-2X8 HEADER AT THE 8050 BETWEEN THE LIVING AREA AND THE BIG PORCH. 3-2X12s ?

2. PLEASE SPECIFY THE HIP RAFTERS (BEAMS) ON THE PORCH

SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. 1 / 6 ; SPECIFY THE THICKNESS AND TYPE OF PLYWOOD SHEATHING.

2. 2 / 6 ; PLEASE PROVIDE 8" MINIMUM PENETRATION INTO CONCRETE FOR ANCHOR BOLTS. R403.1.6

3. 4 / 6 ; PLEASE INVESTIGATE SIMPSON "APS 6". THEY'RE NO LONGER LISTED IN SIMPSON'S CATALOG.

4. 6 / 6 ; PROVIDE A LEDGER TO STUD CONNECTION AND ILLUSTRATE AND SPECIFY A LEDGER.

5. 8 / 6 ; IF THERE IS AN AIR SPACE BETWEEN THE ROOF DECK AND THE INSULATION, VENTILATION IS REQUIRED, 1 : 150 . R806

6. 9 / 6 ; PLEASE FIRE BLOCK AT THE UPPER CEILING LINE. R602.8

7. 10 / 6 ; WHAT IS THE SPACING OF THE 2X4 CLEATS? DESCRIBE THE CEILING JOISTS. HOW MANY 8d NAILS PER CONNECTION? 8d FOR 2X LUMBER?

8. 10 / 6 ; PLEASE SPECIFY THE CEILING MATERIAL.

9. 9, 11 / 6 ; PLEASE STABILIZE THE PONY WALL LATERALLY. CRICKET?

10. 12 / 6 ; PLEASE FIRE BLOCK AT THE LOWER CEILING LINE. R602.8

11. 12 / 6 ; PLEASE CHECK SIMPSON FOR THE NAILING OF "MIT" JOIST HANGERS.

11. 13 / 6 ; PLEASE SPECIFY THE ANCHOR BOLT AND SPACING.

12. 15 / 6 ; PROVIDE LATERAL STABILITY FOR THE PONY WALL.

13. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN / 7 ; PLEASE SHOW BATH VENTILATION FANS.

14. ROOF PLAN / 7 ; PLEASE SHOW ROOF VENTS, IF USED.

15. A / 7 ; THE MAXIMUMLATERALLY UNSUPPORTED LENGTH OF A 2X6 STUD IS 10'. TABLE R602.3 (5) . PLEASE PROVIDE MID-SPAN BLOCKING.

16. 1 / 7 ; 2-16d NAILS PER STUD APPEARS INADEQUATE FOR SOME LENGTHS OF CEILING JOIST. WILL THESE BE COMMONS OR .131"

17. SECTION A / 7 ; PLEASE ILLUSTRATE FIRE BLOCKS AT CEILING LINES. R602.8

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. NOTE AND SPECIFY ALL PIPING MATERIALS.

2. AT 209', OVER 200', ½"= 1 wfu , ¾"= 3.5 wfu , ETC. PLEASE CHECK WATER DISTRIBUTION SIZE.

3. PLEASE SUPPLY WATER TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE HOUSE.

4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SECOND GAS LINE TO THE FIREPLACE IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS AND CHECK THE SIZES..

5. WHY DOES THE GAS LINE REDUCE FROM 1 ¼" TO 1" WITHOUT A REDUCTION IN LOAD?

6. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SECOND WATER HEATER IN THE GAS CALCULATIONS.

7. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SECOND DRYER IN THE GAS CALCULATIONS.

8. EXTEND THE GAS LINE TO THE 4 GAS PACKS AND INCLUDE THEM IN THE GAS CALCULATIONS.

9. PLEASE ADD ANOTHER HOSE BIB, ANOTHER BAR SINK, AND TWO LAUNDRY TUBS (SINKS) TO THE WATER CALCULATIONS.

10. SIZE THE VENT THROUGH THE ROOF NEXT TO "BATH #6".

11. PROVIDE A DRAIN FOR THE SHOWER IN BATH #1.

12. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER HAMMER ARRESTERS ON QUICK CLOSING VALVES. UPC 609.10, IPC 604.9, IRC P2903.5 .


MECHANICAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE CHECK THE RATINGS OF THE UNITS. THEY PUT OUT MORE THAN THEY ARE RATED FOR. PLEASE SUBMIT CUT SHEETS. RECHECK THE DUCT SIZES. THE RETURN AIR DUCT AND FILTER FRAME APPEAR TO BE UNDER SIZED. DID YOU ALLOW FOR GRILL RESTRICTION? 75% IF UNKNOWN. M1403.1 AND M1307.4.1.2 .

2. PLEASE PROVIDE R-8 MINIMUM DUCT INSULATION. N1103.2.1 .

3. PLEASE CORRECT THE NUMBER OF LAUNDRY AND BATH VENTILATION FANS IN THE TABLE AT TTTTHE LOWER RIGHT OF THE MECHANICAL PLAN.

4. GAS APPLIANCES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 17 COMBUSTION AIR REQUIREMENTS. DETAIL HOW.

5. IF THE HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED IN THE ATTIC, SHOW LOCATION OF ACCESS,
CATWALK AND WORKING PLATFORM. SHOW PROVISIONS FOR AND ROUTE OF SECONDARY CONDENSATE
DRAIN PER M1305.1.3.

6. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR TO THE TWO DRYERS IN THE LAUNDRT

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE SPACE THE GENERAL LIGHTING RECEPTACLES TO BE WITHIN 6' OF DOORWAYS AND NOT OVER 12' APART. E3801.2.1

2. ADD A RECEPTACLE TO THE KITCHEN WALL BETWEEN THE PANTRY AND THE HALL. E3801.2.2 ITEM 1 .

3. SHORT CIRCUIT PROTECTION FOR 400 AMP SERVICES IS 22,000AMPS (AFC). SEE TEP's SERVICE BOOK.

4. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, CIRCUITS 6B AND 8B, .AND INCLUDE THEM IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS.

5. PROVIDE CUT SHEETS FOR OUT DOOR LIGHTING.

6. THE ELECTRICAL NOTE SAYS "GROUND ELECTRICAL TO METAL GAS PIPE OR WATER PIPE. SHOULDN'T IT READ "…AND WATER PIPE."

7. PROVIDE ELECTRIC FIXTURE SYMBOL LEGEND.

8. LOCATE THE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING AND PROVIDE CUT SHEETS FOR THE FIXTURES.

9. HOW WILL THE "CUSTOM FIXTURES " IN THE GREAT ROOM BE HUNG? WEIGHT?

10. THE LOAD CALCULATIONS INCLUDES ONLY THREE OF THE FOUR A/C UNITS. PLEASE ADD IN THE FOURTH UNIT. KEEP IN MIND, IF A SERVICE OVER 300 AMPS IS USED, AN ELECTRICAL ENGINEER IS REQUIRED.

11. ELECTRIC RISER DIAGRAM / 9A ; 1" CONDUIT APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE FOR 2- 4/0 AND 2-400KCMIL CONDUCTORS. NEC CHAPTER 9, TABLE 1.





IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 837-4910

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/17/2008 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/17/2008 SHANAE POWELL REJECT SHELF Completed