Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T08BU02067
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 20, 2009 SUBJECT: Hanson's Good To Go- 2nd Grading Plan Review TO: Olsson Associates LOCATION: 1715 W Irvington Road, T15S R13E Sec03, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T08BU02067 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (T08BU02067), Drainage Report (Olsson Associated, Inc., 04NOV08 revised 06APR09), Geotechnical Evaluation and Addendum #1 (Pattison Evanoff Engineering, LLC, 03SEP08, 06APR09) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Olsson Associated, Inc., 19NOV08, 13APR09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Provide a copy of the last approved Development Plan (D08-0044). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved Development Plan. Provide a copy of the stamped approved Development Plan within the grading plan package. 2) Complied. Acknowledged a Public Improvement Agreement (PIA) will be required for all proposed 6-foot sidewalks within the public right-of-way. 3) Complied. Acknowledged a Public Improvement Agreement (PIA) will be required for the proposed 5-foot sidewalks within the public right-of-way. 4) Complied. a) Complied. b) Complied. c) Complied. d) Acknowledged. 5) Restated: DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the grading plan and the required basin access ramp location and accessibility. The dumped angular rock rip rap does not meet the requirements for a drivable surface to allow for access into the basin. Revise the access/spillway detail to something other than rock rip rap or provide another alternative access point. 6) Complied. 7) Restated: All drainage infrastructures must match the Drainage Report and Development Plan with respect to spot elevations, locations, dimensions, sizes, etc. Revise the detail call out for the erosion protection at the basin outlet to match the Development Plan. Detail P/5 does not reflect what is proposed at this location nor does it match the Development Plan, revise. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Acknowledged. 14) Complied. 15) Acknowledged. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Acknowledged. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Revise general note #18 on the grading plan to clearly state all the following: "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 22) Complied. 23) DS Sec.11-01: Revise general grading note #18 to specifically include a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 24) Complied. 25) Acknowledged. 26) Acknowledged. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 27) Complied: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Provide 3 copies with the next grading plan submittal for Engineering stamp approval: 28) Complied. 29) Complied. 30) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised grading plan and 3 copies of the last submitted SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the grading plan review. For questions or to schedule appointments call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 04/22/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 05/04/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/04/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the latest unapproved version (dated 4/14/09) of the development plan, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time until the following ziong comments area addressed and complies with the actual approved and stamped copy of the development plan. Address any zoning comments related to the grading review. a. The two planters in the east parking lot were not revised. There are two options move the parking spaces accordingly to align the wheel stops with the locations of the planters or redo the planters so that the face of the planter is exactly 2.5' from the front of the parking space while still providing the square footage required for the tree placement. Correct detail "L" on sheet 6. (Previous Comment 1.b) The planters within the parking spaces extend beyond the 2.5 feet from the front of the parking stall. This would place the rear of a car within the PAAL. All wheel stop barriers including planters must be designed on the distances as noted in Development Standards 3-05.2.3.C.2. Revise detail "L" to demonstrate compliance. 2. The parking spaces adjacent to the dumpster enclosure is dimesioned at 8.5'. Per DS 3-05.2.1.B.3, When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. Revise the parking space to 10'. 3. Per the grading plan the access ramps along the east entrance depict ramps with curbs along the sides. The development plan depicts flared access ramps. Which is correct? Revise as required. 4. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments could be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/13/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |