Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU01791
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Grading Plan TO: MPE LOCATION: 3162 N Freeway Industrial Loop, T13S, R13E, Section 34, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T08BU01791 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed grading plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Provide a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Grading Plan: 1. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." 2. Verify that the lot number indicated on grading plan is accurate. Per Pima County legal description the lot number for this address is lot 8. 3. Provide area of disturbance on grading plan. 4. Call out and dimension all existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Label existing and future right-of-way dimensions per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. If the dimension for both existing and future ½ right of way is the same label as Existing/Future ½ ROW on site plan. 6. Clearly indicated whether Freeway Industrial Loop is public or private. 7. Provide contour interval on plan. 8. Show grading plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 9. List the consulting drainage engineer and pertinent information on the grading plan. 10. location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. 11. Concrete header note indicated standard detail No 213. Identify the source of the detail (ie. COT) 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Grading Plan: 1. Verify that property is lot 7. Pima County information is indicating lot 8 - revise as needed throughout report. 2. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/22/2008 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 22, 2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T08BU01791 Grading Plans for S08-107 (Bldg T08CM03703) Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 10/31/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site, landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |