Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08BU01755
Parcel: 12904157A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T08BU01755
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/30/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 3, 2008
SUBJECT: 2121 E Broadway Blvd Grading Plan- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Metro Permits Express ATTN: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec08, Ward 6
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08BU01755 (Grading Plan)

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed grading plan (T08BU01755), Drainage Report Submittal #2 (DOWL Engineers, 02SEP08), Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies Inc., 23AUG08), last approved site plan (T08CM01171) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 26SEP08 revised 28OCT08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan application or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for grading plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed:

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Complied.

2) Complied.

3) Complied.

4) Complied.

5) Due to the clarification on the 2nd submittal of the plan for the PAAL intersection with the existing alley provide a detail or call out the COT/PC Standard Detail for Public Improvement (2003 Edition) for a curb terminal section at the proposed curbing along the west side of the PAAL.

6) Complied.

7) Complied.

8) Complied.

9) Complied.

10) Revise Detail 15 on Sheet C1.0 to provide the label for the proposed 12-inch HDPE outlet (keynote #39). Revise the typographical error on the same detail so that the "TYP" width dimension is clearly shown.

11) Complied.

12) Complied.

13) Revise keynote #29 to provide the name of the referenced manual, COT/PC Standard Detail for Public Improvement (2003 Edition) for the proposed geotextile fabric for clarity in the field.

14) Complied.

15) Complied.

16) Restated: Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications.

17) Restated: Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP).

18) Complied.

19) Complied.

20) Complied.

21) Complied.

22) Complied.

23) Complied.

24) Complied.

25) Complied.

26) Complied.

27) Complied.

28) Complied.

29) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. Provide the signatures for all known parties under the certification sections, i.e. owner, contractor, etc. Since the owner of the project is known at this time they are required to sign the certification section of the SWPPP Report prior to DSD approval.

30) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ. The NOI submitted was not signed. A signed NOI for this project is required prior to DSD approval of the SWPPP. If the NOI has not been submitted to ADEQ at this time a copy of the signed document that will be forwarded to ADEQ will be accepted.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised grading plan and SWPPP report that addresses the comments provided above. Include all supplemental information with the next submittal for record keeping purposes. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

For expedite purposes the grading plan can be reviewed over the counter (DSD Engineering Division comment only and with a pre-scheduled appointment made by the applicant) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. However the grading plan must still be submitted to the Permit Counter once it has been stamped approved by all departments in order to digitize the grading plan and get it to our Records Department.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.

Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services
11/03/2008 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied November 3, 2008

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Michael St.Paul
Planning Technician

T08BU01755 Grading Plans for T08CM01171 (2nd review)


Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The Grading Plan appears to be substantially the same as the approved site plan. Please resubmit two copies of the last approved and stamped Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
11/13/2008 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Needs Review Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are reflected on the grading plan.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/20/2008 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/20/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed