Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08BU01700
Parcel: 13816001F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T08BU01700
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/08/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Circle K - Valencia & Nogales Highway
T08BU01700
Grading Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2008

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved and stamped tentative plat/development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped tentative plat/development plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Ensure that the grading plan matches the tentative plat/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t08bu01700

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved development plans and additional requested documents
12/09/2008 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a copy of the approved tentative plat including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved tentative plat.

All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
12/30/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Jason,

Here are my comments:

Sheet C-1
1- Add note, Contractor needs to contact C.O.T. inspector before making any changes to the approved drawings.

Sheet C-2 (show changes to all drawings)
2- Change scale to 1" = 20'. Uniform with all other pages.
3- Provide detail for temporary basin show all dimensions.
4- Show C.O.T. P.D. enforcement camera (northeast corner) on all drawing with note to KEEP CLEAR.
5- Frontage access from Nogales Highway, truncated domes not required. (right-of-way side)
6- Frontage access from Nogales Highway, shift south and make straight across. (remove dog leg)
7- West side of building provide min. 36" access between phone and edge of sidewalk.
8- North side of building shift H.C. ramp to center of access aisle.
9- North side of building, provide wheel stops so vehicles don't over hang H.C. ramp.
10- Southwest corner of building, remove striping at H.C. ramp or provide ramp on south side of road. Access straight across. (remove dog leg in striping)
11- Move truncated domes Southwest side of project to parallel with curb line. (at beginning of striping)
12- Northwest corner of project, shift (both) H.C. ramps east to provide full ramp.
13- Show existing fence line west side of project.
14- Show bollards at end of future access northwest corner of project.
15- Call out width of future access road northwest corner of project.
16- Add "Per C.O.T. D.S. 2-09" to note 4.
17- Frontage access on east side needs to be H.C. accessible.

Sheet C-3 (show changes to all drawings)
18- Call out width of frontage sidewalk from Nogales Highway.
19- Provide 7' sidewalk for parking on east side of building.
20- Rename basins #1 and #2 to water harvesting areas.
21- Show inspection ports for Stormtech basin.
22- Show all flow arrows with percent of slope.
23- Call dimensions for placement of Stormtech basin and size of basin.
24- Call out width of access road south side of project.
25- Remove HP southeast corner of Fuel Canopy.
26- Install valley cutter, per C.O.T. S.D. 208. Between building and fuel canopy.
27- Check grades at H.C. parking. From end of parking space to grate is approx. 20' with an elevation difference of 1.57'. (P=2538.41, GRT=2536.84)
28- Show invert elevation for manholes at each end of Stormtech basin.

Sheet C-5
29- Detail C-C, width of basin does not match Plan view on sheet C-3.
30- Show 2' setback on all details.

Sheet C-6
31- Trash Enclosure details add note, Per C.O.T. D.S. 6-01 to both.
32- Handicap Sign Detail add note, 84" from bottom of sign to ground.

Sheet C-7
33- Call out number of inspection ports every ? feet.
12/30/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 30, 2008
SUBJECT: Circle K Grading Plan- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: LEADS, Inc. ATTN: Hank Hulbert
LOCATION: T15S R13E Sec13, Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08BU01700 (Grading Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (T08BU01700), Drainage Statement (CEI Engineering, 18SEP08 revised 02DEC08), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Foree&Vann, Inc., 14SEP07 with addendums 19FEB08 and 02JUL08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CEI Engineering, 05SEP08, revised 02DEC08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan application or SWPPP at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for grading plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed:


GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Restated: Provide a copy of the last stamped approved Tentative Plat (S07-204). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved Tentative Plat. Verify all information associated with the Tentative Plat is shown on the grading plan that will be used as the construction document.

2) Complied.

3) Restated: Provide a temporary construction easement for the proposed construction and installation of all offsite improvements. This grading plan will not be approved until after the approval of the Tentative Plat and the recordation of the temporary construction easement.

4) Complied.

5) Complied.

6) Restated: It appears that portions of the sidewalk access ramps for the Nogales Highway entrance are located on private property. Prior to grading plan approval a pedestrian easements must be in place for all sidewalks that are located on private property. Contact Jim Rossi at 791-4181 with TDOT Real Estate Division to verify the process for the easement. Refer to Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and questions.

7) Complied.

8) Complied.

9) Complied.

10) Complied.

11) Complied.

12) Complied.

13) Complied.

14) Complied.

15) Complied.

16) Complied.

17) Restated: Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications.

18) Restated: Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

19) Complied.

20) Complied.

21) Complied.

22) Complied.

23) Complied.


NEW COMMENTS GENERATED FROM 2ND REVIEW:

The following comments have been generated by the DSD inspector for compliance with grading standards and on-site requirements. The following dimensions or labels are required to prevent confusing in the field for the contractor and COT inspector.

Sheet C-1
1- Add note, Contractor needs to contact C.O.T. inspector before making any changes to the approved drawings.

Sheet C-2 (show changes to all drawings)
2- Change scale to 1" = 20'. Uniform with all other pages.
3- Provide detail for temporary basin show all dimensions.
4- Show C.O.T. P.D. enforcement camera (northeast corner) on all drawing with note to KEEP CLEAR.
5- Frontage access from Nogales Highway, truncated domes not required. (right-of-way side)
6- Frontage access from Nogales Highway, shift south and make straight across. (remove dog leg)
7- West side of building provide min. 36" access between phone and edge of sidewalk.
8- North side of building shift H.C. ramp to center of access aisle.
9- North side of building, provide wheel stops so vehicles don't over hang H.C. ramp.
10- Southwest corner of building, remove striping at H.C. ramp or provide ramp on south side of road. Access straight across. (remove dog leg in striping)
11- Move truncated domes Southwest side of project to parallel with curb line. (at beginning of striping)
12- Northwest corner of project, shift (both) H.C. ramps east to provide full ramp.
13- Show existing fence line west side of project.
14- Show bollards at end of future access northwest corner of project.
15- Call out width of future access road northwest corner of project.
16- Add "Per C.O.T. D.S. 2-09" to note 4.
17- Frontage access on east side needs to be H.C. accessible.

Sheet C-3 (show changes to all drawings)
18- Call out width of frontage sidewalk from Nogales Highway.
19- Provide 7' sidewalk for parking on east side of building.
20- Rename basins #1 and #2 to water harvesting areas.
21- Show inspection ports for Stormtech basin.
22- Show all flow arrows with percent of slope.
23- Call dimensions for placement of Stormtech basin and size of basin.
24- Call out width of access road south side of project.
25- Remove HP southeast corner of Fuel Canopy.
26- Install valley cutter, per C.O.T. S.D. 208. Between building and fuel canopy.
27- Check grades at H.C. parking. From end of parking space to grate is approx. 20' with an elevation difference of 1.57'. (P=2538.41, GRT=2536.84)
28- Show invert elevation for manholes at each end of Stormtech basin.

Sheet C-5
29- Detail C-C, width of basin does not match Plan view on sheet C-3.
30- Show 2' setback on all details.

Sheet C-6
31- Trash Enclosure details add note, Per C.O.T. D.S. 6-01 to both.
32- Handicap Sign Detail add note, 84" from bottom of sign to ground.

Sheet C-7
33- Call out number of inspection ports every ? feet.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Provide a revised grading plan and 3 copies of the SWPPP at resubmittal that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the grading plan and SWPPP reviews.

If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/09/2009 THAUSER1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/09/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed