Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU01642
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/24/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. After reviewing the grading and comparing it to the stamped and approved development plan the following has been noted as not in compliance with the approved DP and DS 3-01.5.1 (sight visibility triangle requirements) Per the approved and stamped development plan, a 30 inch high masonry wall was to be constructed along the commerce street frontage. The grading plan does not call out the height of the wall specifically in the driveway next to the new parking lot area. However the FG elevation of the wall within the sight visibility triangle is noted as 73.09 and the top of wall is noted as 77.00. This would make portions of the wall within the SVT taller than allowed height per development standards 3-01.5.1. The drawing must be revised to note that any screen walls that may be within a SVT must be no taller than 30 inches. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan and development standard 3-01.5.1. 3. Zoning is willing to review and approve the grading plan (if possible) over the counter once the changes requested are made to the grading plan sheets. Please call the Zoning Section in advance for an appointment if this is an option you would like to pursue. Phone 791-5608 The approved and stamped development, landscape and NPPO plans must be included. |
| 06/29/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/10/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |