Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T08BU01347
Parcel: 13602717A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T08BU01347
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/16/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 16, 2008
SUBJECT: 8200 E Bowline Road- 2nd Grading Plan Review
TO: David Shambach Architects Attn: Julie Ramsey
LOCATION: T14S R15 Sec21 Ward 4
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T08BU01347 (Grading Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (T08BU01347), Hydrology Report (Oracle Engineering Group, 16APR08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Oracle Engineering Group, 17JUL08 revised 11SEP08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the grading plan application or SWPPP at this time. The following items need to be addressed:

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Complied

2) Complied

3) Complied

4) Complied

5) Complied

6) Complied

7) Complied

8) Complied

9) Complied

10) Complied

11) Complied

12) Complied

13) Complied

14) Complied

15) Complied

16) Complied

17) Complied

18) Complied

19) Complied

20) Acknowledged

21) Acknowledged


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

22) Complied

23) Complied

24) Complied

25) Complied

26) Complied

27) Complied

28) Complied

29) Complied

30) Complied

31) Complied

32) Part IV.F: Include copies of the signed NOI as part of the SWPPP. The NOI in Appendix C has not been signed.

33) Complied

34) Complied

35) Part IV.H.6: Describe where the inspection records will be maintained for at least three years; how the report will document noncompliance or certify full compliance; and indicate who will be authorized to sign the report. The Narrative does not include verbiage where the SWPPP and inspection reports are to be maintained for the 3 year period.

36) Complied

37) Complied

38) Part IV.J.1: The Operator must sign the SWPPP. The Operator Certification in Appendix D has not been signed.

39) Complied

40) New Comment: Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." The SWPPP report and exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record or by a Registered Landscape Architect, revise.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide 2 copies of the revised grading plan, 2 copies of the Hydrology Report and 3 copies of the SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the grading plan review.

If you have any questions or to schedule an appointment call me at 837-4929.


Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services
09/19/2008 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 09/19/2008

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. While zoning acknowledges that the grading plan is in substantial zoning compliance as it relates to the Zoning review purview, with the unapproved version of the development plan, the grading plan cannot be approved at this time. Please review the grading plan and compare it to the most current version of the development plan to ensure accuracy and to ensure that any revisions that have been made to the development plan after the grading plan was submitted are addressed.

3. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan.
09/24/2008 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a copy of the development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading submittal as necessary to comply with the approved plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/30/2008 THAUSER1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/30/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed