Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T08BU01073
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and floodplain Review, 07/07/2008 Grading Plan Comments: 1- Provide a copy of the Tentative Plat. Please be advised that the grading plan shall be approved only after the tentative plat is approved. 2- Please be advised that the approval of the final grading for Lots 5 through 8 requires an approved development for these lots. 3- Provide the T08BU01073 case number in the Tile Block. 4- Use the T07PI00023 (PIA number) as a reference only. 5- Include the CDRC Case number in the Title Block. 6- Show and label grading limits. Include the grading limits symbol in the legend. 7- Add the following general notes: a. The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work. b. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department. c. CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A DSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML. d. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. e. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. f. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. g. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. h. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. i. The permitee shall notify the DSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. 8- It appears that some grading/construction work is proposed within Houghton Road right of way. If this is the case, revise the grading plan title to reflect this information. 9- Show on Sheet 1/2 the basis of elevation. 10- Show the basis of bearing tie to the subject development. 11- The entrance to the site is not clear. It appears that the site can be accessed from Houghton Road, but the stabilized entrance is shown on the north side of Lot 6. Additionally, the stabilized entrance does not appear to connect to any access road. Clarify. 12- The proposed contour lines do not appear to meet the existing contours at the edge of the proposed grading. Clarify how the proposed grading will be matched up with the existing grades on the edges of the proposed grading. 13- Work in the public right of way requires an excavation permit and/or a private improvement agreement. Check with City of Tucson Department of Transportation Permits and Codes for additional information. 14- Resubmit the redlined plan with future Grading Plan submittals. 15- Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. SWPPP Comments: 1. Show the grading limits on the SWPPP exhibit. 2. Place controls inside grading limits. 3. Is there any proposed work in the right of way that needs to be included in the SWPPP. 4. The Contractor's Spill Prevention Plan is missing in Appendix J. 5. Why is the SWPPP for the Drexel/Houghton Road improvements included in the submittal? 6. Borderland Construction mailing address is missing on Page 2. Revise 7. Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with day-to-day operational control of those activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. Provide a table for recording the names and responsibilities for each party responsible for activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. (Part IV.B.1.d). 8. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). Additionally, the certifications shall be signed and dated. 9. Provide a signed NOI for Tracy Nuckolls. Additionally, provide a couple of blank NOI forms for the unknown operators. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. 10. Identify location and potential discharges from support activities, including asphalt/concrete plants and stockpiles if applicable. (Part IV.C.5). 11. Section "IV.B.2." states that the Site Map should show the approximate post-grading slopes, locations of waste, borrow, fill, equipment storage, or offsite material, but Figure 2 does appear to provide this information. Revise. 12. Provide in the report a copy of the AZPDES Construction General Permit (i.e. Appendix G). 13. Appendices "H" and "I" appear to be missing. Provide any missing information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/02/2008 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/02/2008 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan. Please submit a copy of the CDRC approved and stamped development plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped development plan and landscape/NPPO plans. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 07/08/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/08/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |