Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REZONING - ZE HEARING
Plan Number - T07SE00026
Review Name: REZONING - ZE HEARING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/05/2007 | MCASTRO2 | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | TDOT Engineering has reviewed the subject Special Exception request and has no objections. Andy Dinauer |
| 11/05/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Completed | Response has been included in EARLIER email for C9-07-29, KIPPES - UHL STREET, RX-2 TO R-2. No new comments! COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 47 PM Peak: 4 Please call if you have questions. Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 11/05/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | ADOT | Completed | ADOT has NO COMMENT on the New Special Exception Douglas Kratina |
| 11/06/2007 | JULIE YBARRA | SIGNS | SIGN CODE REVIEW | Completed | The above referenced case is located in the Single Family Residential District and will need to comply with the Single Family Residential District of the Tucson Sign Code |
| 11/06/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/06/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/08/2007 | MCASTRO2 | COMMUNITY PLANNING | REVIEW | Completed | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN C9-07-29 Kippes - Uhl Street Rezoning and SE-07-26 RCP Under Five Acres RX-2 to R-2 and a SE for RCP under five acres Pantano East Area Plan 11/08/07 drcorral The request is to rezone from RX-2 to R-2 zoning to allow for the development of a residential cluster project (RCP) with bonus density. The site will consist of a total eight, two-story townhomes, with four attched units on either side of a private street (Uhl Drive), fronting Uhl Street, a local street. Because the site is under five acres in size, the site is also being processed as a Special Exception (SE- 07-26 ZEFNP for RCP's < 5 acres). The site is bordered by Mountain View Church of the Nazarene on the east and south, a single-family residence to the west, and an apartment complex, located across Uhl Street to the north. The zoning site is within the Pantano East Area Plan (PEAP). The City of Tucson's General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual also provide policy and guidance for land use. Plan Policy Summary: The Pantano East Area Plan (PEAP) supports infill development projects and support a variety of housing types, including townhouses that reflect sensitivity to site and neighborhood conditions and adhere to relevant site and architectural design guidelines. General Plan policies encourage new residential development that contributes to the visual character of the neighborhood and promotes neighborhood identity. Policies promote quality and safety in design, and compatibility with and adequate buffering of surrounding development. The PEAP promotes design flexibility development by encouraging infill development under the residential cluster (RCP) option, such as in this case. Medium-density (up to 15 units per acre) residential development is generally supported along collector streets, while high-density residential development (over 15 units per acre) is appropriate along arterial streets. The proposal is for medium to high-density residential, and while Uhl Street is not a collector nor an arterial street, the subject site is located on a street with higher density residential property to the west and north (Zoned R-3), and a church to the south. It appears that this area is transitioning to higher density land uses and development patterns, as depicted by the existing development and zoning pattern; therefore, the proposed request, eight units on .83 acres, appears to be consistant with the Plans. Analysis The proposal of this request consists of an eight unit Residential Cluster Project with density bonus; as such requires rezoning the property from RX-2 to R-2 and because the site is less than five acres, the applicant is also requesting a Special Exception. Both of these requests are generally consistent with the SPAP and General Plan, as this area appears to be transitioning to higher density land uses and development patterns, as depicted by the existing development and zoning pattern. The site is located on Uhl Street approximately 0.08 miles west of Pantano Road, and abuts vacant land to the south, with Mountain View Church of Nazarene to the east both zoned RX-2, there is a single-family, single-story residence to west of the site zoned R-3. Across Uhl Street to the north and northwest is an existing two-story apartment complex. The PEAP promotes design flexibility development by encouraging infill development under the residential cluster (RCP) option, such as in this case. The General Plan policies encourage new residential development that contributes to the visual character of the neighborhood and promotes neighborhood identity and promotes quality and safety in design, and compatibility with and adequate buffering of surrounding development. According to the design compatibility report, the applicant proposes to protect the privacy of residentially zoned property to the west. The four units abutting the single-family residence to the west will not have any balconies, and any windows on the west façade will be limited to clerestory windows with a sill height of seven feet. Any units adjacent to right-of-way and abutting residentially zoned property shall incorporate four-sided architecture, such that building facades at the rear and sides will be designed with attention to the architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. To conform to the aesthetic standards and requirements of RCP's, no two alike units of the same color shall be placed adjacent to each other. Exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent development and street frontages, and will be architecturally integrated into the overall site design. Additionally, all proposed the perimeter screen walls adjacent to the right-of-way or adjacent to residentially zoned property will be painted or constructed of graffiti-resistant material. To maintain the visual character of the neighborhood, new development will apply consistent design treatment common to the existing character of the neighborhood. To demonstrate buildings will be visually interesting and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, dimensioned and colored elevation drawings will be submitted with the tentative plat, reflecting the design considerations presented in the DCR. The RCP will also include the planing of one (1) fifteen-gallon tree on every other lot along Uhl Drive, a private street. This will not only create a microclimate for pedestrians but will also increase the aesthetic appeal of a development. The applicant will provide a copy of a letter from the Arizona State Museum, indicating that archeological surveys have been conducted on the site. State law requires that the Arizona State Museum be notified of the discovery of any remains so that, in consultation with Native American communities, appropriate arrangements can be made for their repatriation and reburial by cultural groups who claim cultural or religious affinity to them. A Homeowner's Association will be formed to oversee enforcement of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) created for for this subdivision which will include provisions for the maintenance of all common areas, minimization of noise factors or of any other factors which could impact adjacent residentially zoned property. The PEAP, the General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual encourage and support development projects that incorporate quality and safe design elements that enhance the overall function and visual quality of the street and adjacent properties. As, such, lots that abut recreation areas will incorporate safe-by-design concepts by placing the "eyes of the community," thorugh the use of open space fencing material. The Plans also call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. Amenities can include, but are not limited to: tables, outdoor grills, and/or shaded sitting area(s) [An active/passive adult recreational facility, can include a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The tentative plat shows three recreation areas. Two of the areas are located on the back of the site measuring 1,567 square feet each and are located at the southwest corner and southeast corners respectively. The third site, measuring 1,834 square feet is located at the front of the site, specifically, the northeast corner of the site. While all three sites have incorporated benches for seating, there is is ample space and opportunity for additional amenities such as picnic tables, outdoor grills and a tot lot. Furthermore, to increase the usability of the recreation areas, a variety of shade trees selected from the Low Water Use Tolerant List are to be planted and such shown on the landscape plan. CONCLUSION The proposed development is consistent with and supported by the policy direction provided in the General Plan and the Pantano East Area Plan. The following are recommended as rezoning conditions, and the referenced Plans and the Design Guidelines Manual support them. 1. Recreation areas will incorporate elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and those pedestrian facilities will be accessible to the handicapped These areas will be made ADA accessible with a minimum five- (5)-foot-wide path constructed of either stabilized DG, asphalt, or textured concrete.. In addition to shaded seating areas, the recreation areas will include but are not limited to a ramada, tables, and an outdoor grill. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, can include a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. Relevant Policies · General Plan, Element 4, Supporting Policy 6.2 · D.G. - II.A.2.a -Outdoor Activity/Play Areas 2. Provide a minimum of one fifteen-(15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on every other lot frontage. Relevant Policies · General Plan, Element 4, Supporting Policy 4.9 · D.G. - I.B.3.c. - Placement of Trees 3. A Homeowner's Association shall be established to oversee the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for this subdivision. The CC&R's are to include provisions for the maintenance of all common areas on the site and will include clauses to assist in minimizing noise factors or any other factors which could impact adjacent residentially zoned property Relevant Policies · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 5 4. To increase the usability of the recreation areas, provide a wide range of shade trees from the Low Water Use Drought Tolerant List. To increase appearance, shade, and longevity diversity, provide an appropriate amount of longer living and diverse shade producing trees, including evergreens that are in the Low Water use Drought Tolerant List. Do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the recreation area. Relevant Policies · D.G. - I.B.3.d. - Plant Materials · D.G. - I.B.3.g. - Planting for Visibility and Security 5. To enhance public safety and reduce the incidences of crime, "Safe by Design" concepts will be incorporated in the development plan for review by the Tucson Police Department. Relevant Policies · PEAP Residential Policy 3. C. · D.G. - II.A.1.b - "Safe By Design" Concepts 6. Patio walls abutting recreation areas will incorporate safe-by-design concepts by placing the "eyes of the community." Patio wall for units 2, 6 and 7 will meet the following criteria: the masonry wall portion of the wall will not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot, six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. Relevant Policies · PEAP Residential Policy 3. C. · General Plan, Element 4, Supporting Policy 6.2 · D.G. - II.A.1.b - "Safe By Design" Concepts 7. Clerestory windows only for all second story windows facing towards the west, and no balconies allowed for the second story floor facing the west Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 1 · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 8. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent development and street frontages, and it shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the development. Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 1 · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 · DG I.B.2.d - Rooftop Equipment 9. Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials and a note indicating such shall be placed on the Tentative Plan or Landscape Plan. Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 3.b · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 § DG I.C.3.a. - Free-standing Walls 10. No two alike units of the same color and design shall be placed next to one another. Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 1 · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 · D.G. - I.B.2.e - Design Context and Neighborhood Character 11. Side and rear building facades adjacent to public right-of-way and residentially zoned property will be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 1 · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 · D.G. - I.B.2.e - Design Context and Neighborhood Character 12. To demonstrate compliance with the above rezoning conditions, dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials are to be submitted as a part of the platting process to CDRC. Relevant Policies · PEAP - Residential Policy 1 · General Plan, Element 4, Policy 6 · D.G. - I.B.2.e - Design Context and Neighborhood Character 13. An archaeological assessment and survey shall be performed by a qualified archaeologist before any grading or other ground modification takes place. If cultural features or remains are found, testing and data recovery shall be completed as needed. Copies of testing plans, testing reports, data recovery plans and final reports shall be submitted to and approved by the City Historic Preservation Office prior to construction work commencing. If, during construction, human remains and associated burial items are discovered, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will cease, the discovery site will be secured, and the Arizona State Museum will be immediately notified as required under A. R. S. 41-865. Relevant Policies · General Plan, Element 5, Policy 1 14. Unsightly and noise-generating elements such as community trash/recycling containers will be placed 50 feet away from adjacent residential uses to the west and will be screened by masonry walls and landscaping to mitigate potential visual, odor, and noise impacts. Relevant Guideline: · DG III.A.1.c - Siting of "Undesirable" Elements Pantano East Area Plan DEFINITIONS Density Low - Average densities up to six units per acre are included in this category. The basic unit of development is single family units on separate lots but some attached units such as duplexes and townhouses are also appropriate. Medium - This category includes average densities up to 15 units per acre. A mixture of housing types including single family homes on small lots, duplexes, townhouses, apartments, condominiums and mobile home parks characterize this designation. High - Densities over 15 units per acre are appropriate under this category. Multi-family developments including townhouses, apartments and condominiums are most appropriate. RESIDENTIAL Policy 1 is to preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods.. Policy 2. Promote residential infill of vacant land where adequate provisions of streets and utilities are available. Policy 3. Ensure the compatibility of new development with existing land uses. Implementation Techniques A. Promote clustering and design flexibility in developments by encouraging the use of planned unit developments,* zero lot line, lot development options, and residential development projects. B. Require appropriate design elements (fences, walls, vegetation, etc.) during the rezoning and development review processes when locating multi-family dwellings and nonresidential uses within proximity of established neighborhoods. C. Employ defensible space concepts in development proposals. D. Locate residential development outside the 100-year floodplain, as specified in the Floodplain Regulations. E. Require pedestrian and bikeways in and around all neighborhood facilities, e.g. schools, parks, and commercial centers. Policy 3 is to ensure the compatibility of new development with existing land uses; one implementation technique (C.) is to employ defensible space concepts in development proposals Implementation Techniques B. Low- and medium-density residential developments are generally appropriate along collector streets. C. Medium- and high-density residential developments are appropriate along arterial streets. General Plan Element 1: Growth Areas and Population Mid-City Growth Area Background: The overall policies of the Mid-City Growth Area are focused on neighborhood preservation, transportation efficiencies, and commercial revitalization. Policy 10: Support continued neighborhood investment. Policy 11: Support a mix of housing types and opportunities throughout the Mid-City Growth Area to meet the diverse needs of the residents. Element 4: Community Character and Design Policy 4 is to design and maintain streets to enhance their overall function and aesthetic quality. Supporting Policy 4.9 is to promote the planting of street trees to provide shade for the pedestrian and visual relief for the driver and bicyclist. Policy 5 is to promote neighborhood identify and visual character. Supporting Policy 5.1 encourages neighborhood associations to record, publicize, and disseminate to potential developers and the City Planning Department the list of features characterizing their area. Supporting Policy 5.3 is to support infill and redevelopment projects that reflect sensitivity to site and neighborhood conditions and adhere to relevant site and architectural design guidelines. Policy 6: Promote quality in design for residential, commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and publicly funded development. Supporting Policy 6.1 All development should incorporate environmentally sensitive design that protects the integrity of existing neighborhoods, complements adjacent land uses, and enhances the overall function and visual quality of the street, adjacent properties, and the community. Supporting Policy 6.6 Solutions and strategies included in the Design Guidelines Manual should be utilized to provide an improved level of community design. Element 5: Cultural Heritage Policy 1. Identify, evaluate, and protect historic and archaeologic resources. Land Use Code Land Use Code, Article III. Development Regulations, Division 6. Development Incentives Section 3.6.1 Residential Cluster Project (RCP) for site of less than five acres. Design Guidelines Manual A. Land Use and Site Design 1. Site Planning II.A.1.b - "Safe By Design" Concepts Intent - Provide a safer development by adhering to "Safe by Design" concepts. 2. Forms/Scale/Material/Color I.B.2.d. - Rooftop Equipment Intent - Minimize mechanical equipment on rooftops to reduce negative visual impacts on neighbors and to reduce energy costs. Solution - Integrate solar energy techniques and other mechanical equipment into the overall design of the building and screen all mechanical equipment on roofs. I.B.2.e - Design Context and Neighborhood Character Intent - Improve the character of new projects and reinforce existing architectural character in established neighborhoods. Solution - Harmonize new building with existing buildings by incorporating design elements of the adjacent architecture including the following: · Scale and massing of structures · Roof and parapet forms · Door and window-fenestration pattern · Finishes, materials, and colors · Site amenities such as walls and landscaping · Traditional or prevailing setbacks and building orientation 3. Buffering/Screening/ Landscape Design I.B.3.a. - Free-standing Walls Intent - Reduce the impact of freestanding walls over 75 feet long and over 3 feet high and increase their visual appeal. Solution - Promote variations in scale, reflective surface, texture, and pattern: · Vary wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.) · Plant trees and shrubs, in voids created by wall variations, at an appropriate scale/massing · Locate trees every 25 feet · Use two or more wall materials and/or incorporate a visually interesting design on the wall surface · Include decorative features of tile, stone, or brick · Use sound absorbing or scattering materials such as tile, stone, or brick I.B.3.b - Water Harvesting Intent - Conserve water resources and preserve drainage patterns, thereby reducing engineering and irrigation costs. Solution - Design for water-harvesting to direct all excess runoff onto vegetated areas: · Make 'saucers' around newly planted trees and shrubs · Harvest runoff using surface grading I.B.3.c. - Placement of Trees Intent - Provide a pleasant microclimate for pedestrians and increase the aesthetic appeal of a development. Solution - Carefully locate trees to provide shade, wherever possible, to pedestrians by: · Placing trees no further than 25' apart, particularly along walkways · Clustering trees at plaza areas or other public gathering places I.B.3.d. - Plant Materials Intent - Provide a homogeneous landscape design of appropriate character using minimal irrigation. Solution - Choose the right mix of trees, shrubs, and groundcover: · Drought tolerant trees (see the City's drought tolerant plant list) · Plants similar in form and scale to existing vegetation in the area · Accent plants at entryways, changes of direction, intersections of roads, etc. · Vegetation which displays a variety of leaf size, texture, color, and, if possible, provides flowers in all seasons I.B.3.g. - Planting for Visibility and Security Intent - Select and position plant materials to aid surveillance and minimize crime. Solution - Maintain visibility of doors and windows from the street and from within the development: · Lift canopies of trees near buildings to six feet from the base of the trunk; plant larger specimens in those locations · Shrub/groundcover height near buildings should be less than 30 inches; choose low-growing varieties · Site spiny or thorny plants under ground floor windows to discourage unwanted access s:\caserev\rezoning\rez07/08\ C9-07-29 Kippes - Uhl Street Rezoning and SE-07-26 RCP Under Five Acres |
| 11/14/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | OTHER AGENCIES | Passed | 11/5/07 No comment. Tim Bolton Principal Planner Arizona State Land Department Southern Arizona Real Estate Office (P) 520-209-4250 (f) 520-209-4251 |
| 11/14/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | OTHER AGENCIES | Passed | DATE: November 9, 2007 TO: City of Tucson Rezoning FROM: Gary Peterson, Ph.D., AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: SE-07-26 City of Tucson, Kippes-Uhl Special Exception-Full Notice Procedure _______________________________________________________________________________________ The Pima County Regional Flood Control District has reviewed this proposal and has no objection to the request. The parcel is located within the City of Tucson. According to the Pima County Intranet MapGuide, there are no areas of FEMA-mapped floodplains on the parcel and no local washes. There are no drainage complaints on file with the Flood Control District that affect the site, and no areas of County-mapped riparian habitat. GP/GS/cd cc: File |
| 11/14/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | OTHER AGENCIES | Passed | Transportation has no comments. Ted Roberts Pima County |
| 11/14/2007 | JIMHOFF1 | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | PIMA CNTY WASTEWATER | Completed | Don Willhoit Senior Civil Engineering Assistant Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department SUBJECT: KIPPES – UHL STREET Special Exception / Rezoning RX-2 to R-2 SE-07-25 / C9-07-29 The Development Liaison Section of the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the above referenced submittal and offers the following comments for your use: The PCRWRD has no objection to the proposed special exception or proposed rezoning to allow a Residential Cluster Project (RCP) on 0.83 acres. Should the City of Tucson be inclined to approve this special exception, the PCRWRD recommends the following rezoning conditions: The owner / developer shall construe no action by Pima County as a commitment to provide sewer service to any new development within the rezoning area until Pima County executes an agreement with the owner / developer to that effect. The owner / developer shall obtain written documentation from the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department that treatment and conveyance capacity is available for any new development within the rezoning area, no more than 90 days before submitting any tentative plat, development plan, sewer improvement plan or request for building permit for review. Should treatment and / or conveyance capacity not be available at that time, the owner / developer shall have the option of funding, designing and constructing the necessary improvements to Pima County’s public sewerage system at his or her sole expense or cooperatively with other affected parties. All such improvements shall be designed and constructed as directed by the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department. The owner / developer shall connect all development within the rezoning area to Pima County’s public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department in its capacity response letter and as specified by the Development Services Department at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan, sewer construction plan, or request for building permit. The owner / developer shall complete the construction of all necessary public and/or private sewerage facilities as required by all applicable agreements with Pima County, and all applicable regulations, including the Clean Water Act and those promulgated by ADEQ, before treatment and conveyance capacity in the downstream public sewerage system will be permanently committed for any new development within the rezoning area. |
| 11/15/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | DSD Engineering has no objection or adverse comment to approval of a Special Exception. Matt Flick, P.E. Engineering Manager Development Services Department City of Tucson Phone: (520) 837-4931 Fax: (520) 879-8010 Please visit our web site: www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd |
| 11/15/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved | Sidewalks/Ramps shall not straddle the ROW/Property line. Sidewalks/Ramps shall be contained within the public ROW. |
| 11/15/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: C9-07-29 Kippes Uhl Subdivision RCP Subdivision under 5 acres Zoning Review report for Zoning Examiner TRANSMITTAL: November 15, 2007 The zoning for this property is proposed as R-2. The proposed use falls under the Residential Use Group, Subject to LUC 2.3.5 and RCP 3.6.1. Development designator "RCP-6" with Density Bonus requires or allows the following: Minimum site area 10,000 s.f. Maximum Site Coverage = 75% Maximum building height = 25' feet Subdivision perimeter yard indicator = BB Proposed Residential Cluster project with density bonus, requires 25% of site dedicated to recreation area, which requires further demonstration of code compliance on the plan. Off-Street Parking: Guest parking is required at a ratio of 1 space for each residence when no on street parking is provided, and must meet DS 2-10 and DS 3-01 and DS 3-05. Pedestrian Access: Sidewalks are required throughout the development, as is demonstrated on the plan. Barrier free access is required for 25% of the units within the subdivision - from the street to the entry of the residence. Streets: All street standards must be followed per DS 3-01, regardless of whether they are public or private. Setbacks: Building setbacks for the units can be provided based upon the under 140 ADT allowance in Section 3.5.6.2.B of the LUC. Carports and Garages however, if on site parking is to be provided, must be setback 18' from the property line and 19' from the back of the sidewalk. It is difficult to tell on the plan what the property line setback is going to be, however, it appears garages will not have parking in front of them and the setback will be reduced to no greater than 8' from the edge of pavement to the structure. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/19/2007 | MCASTRO2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/19/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | SCHOOL DISTRICT | Passed | |
| 11/19/2007 | MCASTRO2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/19/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | OFFICE OF CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | Passed | |
| 11/19/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | TDOT RTA | Passed | |
| 11/19/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | TDOT STREETS | Passed | |
| 11/21/2007 | MARK CASTRO | REZ AGENCY REVIEW | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed |