Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Permit Number - T07SA00130
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: September 24, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Scenic Corridor Zone/Environmental Resource Zone Review . The activity number is T07SA00130. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 16th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, NPPO PLAN, GRADING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT SCZ GENERAL COMMENTS 1. A 30' wide buffer area shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state. This natural undisturbed 30' buffer shall be measured from the future ROW line (property line). Clearly indicate within this 30' buffer area this is an area of no disturbance and is to remain natural. Revise accordingly. LUC 2.8.2.4.A. 2. The submitted grading plan shows the FEMA floodplain limits in a different location. Be advised the information on the grading plan must match the information on the development plan. Revise the grading plan to show the floodplain limits in the correct location. 3. Are any proposed utilities located within the ROW? Show on the grading plan locations of proposed utility lines. All new utilities must be located underground within the property limits and along the ROW when a project is subject the SCZ requirements. Add a general note to the development stating, "All new utilities must be located underground within the property limits and along the ROW." Address all requested information in the response letter and on the plans. LUC 2.8.2.9. 4. Be advised, per LUC 2.8.2.6.C., drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. ERZ GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The proposed development is encroaching into the floodplain limits, therefore an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) is required to be submitted. Refer to DS 2-13.2.5.B. for the required content for an ERR. |
| 08/28/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: T07SA00130 Lucky Wishbone Overlay Zone Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 28, 2007 DUE DATE: August 14, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Overlay Zone case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc.) and ERZ as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) SCZ Comments: 2. Please provide dimension to the building walls which are 18'-8" to verify that that portion of the building meets required setbacks from Mission Road (56 feet). LUC 2.8.2.5.A 3. Please label the buffer "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 4. Please add the view corridor calculations to the plan. Any development which has at least two hundred (200) feet of frontage along a scenic route will have view corridors, with a combined width of at least twenty (20) percent of that frontage, which allow vision from a least one point into and through that portion of the project. 5. Please add the appropriate following notes to the tentative, development, or site plan plat. a) This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is T07SA00130. The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date (add date), without conditions. b) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Mission Road, not to exceed 30 feet. Please add portion of building that is 18'-8" to this note. 6. Regulations for signs are stipulated in Sec. 3-32, Scenic Route District, of Chapter 3, Advertising and Outdoor Signs, of the Tucson Code, and further supplemented by the following: a) On any conflicts in requirements between the LUC and Sec. 3-32, the more strict of the two prevails. b) Signs are to use colors, which are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within four hundred (400) feet of the right-of-way line on any street or route designated "scenic". ERZ Comments: 7. Development in the ERZ has two options available for development. a) The ERZ does not apply when there is no encroachment of the 100-year floodplain. Temporary fencing is required between the project site and the floodplain area. b) If encroachment occurs requiring an Environmental Resource Report and a mitigation plan to be reviewed by Stormwater Advisory Committee (SAC), who then makes recommendations to the DSD Director. 8. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\T07SA00130oz.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/11/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the application. Per LUC 2.8.2.6.C Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural states. The site may be impacted by the West Branch of the Santa Cruz River which is both an ERZ and WASH ordinance wash. The project site may contain riparian habitat regulated by the ERZ overlay zone and protected by the WASH regulations. Submit and Environmental Resource Report per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1 if the development impacts a regulated area (DS 2-13.2.2.A.,B,C). Show any regulated areas on the plans per DS 2-13.2.4. |
| 09/25/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 25, 2007 Dan Elder Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: T07SA00130 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone for 1465 West Silverlake Road (D06-0039) Dear Dan: Your submittal of August 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD). The public comment period will be opened during the next two weeks. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 |