Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Permit Number - T07SA00095
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 18, 2007 SUBJECT: Las Nubes Overlay Zones- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2740 W Goret Road, T13S R13E Sec33, Ward 1 REVIEWER: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T07SA00095 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the overlay application, Private Grading and Paving Plan, DSMR approval, the homeowners letter of intent for the $30,0000 contribution, and the average cross slope analysis and does not recommend approval of the overlay application at this time. The Private Grading and Paving Plan was reviewed for overlay application purposes only, a grading permit application is required for a full grading review. The following items need to be addressed: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) Be advised that the Tentative Plat con not be approved prior to the Overlay Application approval. This is the first submittal of the overlay application any changes required by other departments may require a change in Tentative Plat design. 2) Provide a note on the revised Tentative Plat that states "Individual lots require a separate grading plan with the building plan submittal for conformance to the last approved tentative plat and grading plan." HDZ/SCZ OVERLAY COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.9-04.2.2.A: Provide the contour interval used for the 15% Slope Map and Site Plan. The contour interval should be located next to the scale reference on the top right corner of the page. 4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.7: Revise Paving and Grading Note #8 to reference the name, geotechnical reference number, and contact information of the geotechnical report with subsequent addendum for the proposed project. 5) Revise Paving and Grading Note #9 to include observation of "the placement of fill and culverts at all wash crossing," within the wording of the note. 6) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify on the preliminary grading plan the Natural Open Space (NOS) delineation, include the NOS symbol in the legend. 7) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.2: Provide spot elevations along the new private street at wash crossings to verify existing grades, proposed grades and positive drainage. 8) Provide on the proposed grading plan striped crosswalks at all transitions of the pedestrian circulation path. Specifically at the driveway entrance to the private road and in areas where the pedestrian circulation crosses to the other side of the road. 9) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.6: Revise the grading plan to demonstrate that the protective slopes from all proposed culverts reflect the minimum grade as recommended in the revised Geotechnical Report. Verify that the constructed slopes can be built without encroaching into the platted Natural Open Space. Provide percent slopes and details for the rock riprap used for slope protection. 10) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Clarify the limits of grading on the grading plan. Provide the parcel area and the disturbance area on the grading plan along with the grading limits clearly delineated. 11) DS Sec.3-01.4.5: Provide details on the Private Grading and Paving Plan for the general design of the entrance road and subdivision street to reflect the DSMR criteria and requirements. All dimensions, radii, % slopes, longitudinal grades, crown inverts, pedestrian circulation, etc must be labeled and shown in plan view, with details, and must conform to the approved DSMR 07-11. 12) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Revise the Private Grading and Paving Plan to label and dimension the required 8-foot minimum graded shoulder with the maximum 2% cross slope required by DSMR 07-11 along the frontage of Goret Road. 13) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the culvert details on Sheet 4 to include all dimensions, lengths, side slopes (H:V), and the delineated NOS line to verify that the slopes and construction vehicles do not encroach into the NOS during or after construction. 14) DS Sec.11-01.2.3: A bond shall be posted for native seeding. If grading construction does not commence within 60 days after grubbing, the disturbed area shall be native seeded within 30 days following the expiration of the 60 day period. The reseed bond will be required at time of grading permit issuance and is based on the total disturbance area in square feet at $0.05 per squarefoot. 15) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Steve Tineo at 741-3115 for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. 16) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.2: Provide a General Note on the grading plan stating "The portion of the site or lot to be left ungraded are to remain undisturbed and are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. Temporary fencing will be installed on sites where the NOS abuts the construction areas in order to prevent encroachment in the natural areas." 17) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a General Note stating that all CMU walls and retaining walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments. 18) Add a general note; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 19) DS 10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the grading plan stating that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and culverts. Provide the recordation information for the required Condition, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that address the maintenance responsibility of the homeowners association. 20) Please ensure that the Grading Plan is consistent with the Drainage Report, Geotechnical Evaluation and the proposed Tentative Plat. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GENERAL COMMENTS: The following items are required at the Grading Plan Application Stage. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan application submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html A Floodplain Use Permit (FUP) will be required for all work proposed in the floodplain or erosion hazard area. A FUP application will be required at the time that the grading plan application is submitted. Please provide a revised preliminary grading plan at re-submittal. The revised grading plan must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520-837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/27/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval at this time, see tentative plat comments for requested revisions or clarifications. |
| 06/28/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments related to the special application review. |
| 06/29/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 29, 2007 Michael Marks, AICP MJM Consulting 7002 East 4th Street Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: T07SA00095 Hillside Development and Scenic Corridor Overlay Zones for Las Nubes Subdivision (S06-050) Dear Mike: Your submittal of June 5, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD). The public comment period will be opened during the week of July 2, 2007. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 885-5021 |