Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Permit Number - T07SA00082
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T07SA00082 (Site T07CM01155) 1833 West Speedway Boulevard Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) TRANSMITTAL: June 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This review is for a Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) overlay review (LUC Section 2.8.2). The purposed site is for a single family residential (SFR) in the R-1 zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.1). The Development Designator is "G" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.B) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is AA (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). 2. The following comment from the original site review must be address in order to determine the location of the relative setbacks for the SCZ: This property is located on West Speedway Boulevard, which is on the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone (LUC Section 2.8.3). Please demonstrate compliance with the MS&R requirements by providing the existing and future right-of-ways (ROWs) and the existing and future curb locations (DS 2-02.2.1.A.19). 3. A thirty (30) foot landscaping buffer is required along the SCZ measured from the edge of the future ROW (LUC Section 2.8.2.4). 4. There is an addition front setback requirement (See comment # 5 for the site review T07CM01155). The house must also be set back three (3) times the height of the structure's walls facing the front property line (LUC Section 2.8.2.5). The maximum building height is twenty-four (24) in the SCZ (LUC Section 2.8.2.5.A.3). 5. All structures within the SCZ must have colors that match those that "are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones" (LUC Section 2.8.2.10.A). 6. All building heights must be stated on the plan (see site plan model). Do not simply refer to another sheet. Also provide fully dimensioned elevations. 7. Please be aware that there shall be additional comments relative to the Overlay procedure and submittals, changes in the plans submitted and/or additional information provided. |
| 06/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval. The application submitted was reviewed only as it relates to SCZ compliance. Additional comments may apply with subsequent reviews. Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. DS 2-06.7.1.B. All landscaping, including preservation and reestablishment of native vegetation, shall comply with Sec. 3.7.5.2, Scenic Routes. The following comments apply to regulatory floodplain area comments related to Case # T07CM01155: 1) The site contains regulatory floodplain areas that may contain riparian habitat. This habitat may not unnecessarily altered per TCC Sec. 26-5.2. Refer to DS 2-13 for the preparation, submittal, and review procedures for development within areas that have environmental habitat in conformance with Article 1, Division 1, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations. 2) Submit an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1. The report will document (1) the areas that contain riparian and wildlife habitat that is to be preserved and (2) those areas without such habitat within the regulatory floodplain. 3) All site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 2-13.2.2.A shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and the Protected Riparian Area. Verify that floodplain is correctly delineated. 4) All development within the Protected Riparian Area shall be reviewed to insure that there is no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian resources. Refer to DS 2-13.2.5.B.2 for Development Restrictions. 5) Where any development encroaches within the Protected Riparian Areas, mitigation will be required. A mitigation report shall be submitted with the Environmental Resource Report per DS 2-13.2.5.C 6) Submit a Landscape plan. A summary of mitigation and preservation requirements shall be included. The plans shall show the location of mitigation areas; methods used for mitigation of preserved natural areas, restoration and re-vegetation of disturbed areas. 7) Encroachments into Protected Riparian Area shall be located and constructed to minimize disturbance of the habitat and wildlife movement per DS 2-13.2.5.B.2 8) Any Protected Riparian Area on the property shall be protected through a conservation or public easement or other legal restriction. DS 2-13.2.6.D 9) Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/23/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 23, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: 1833 W Speedway Scenic Route and Protected Riparian Area Review (First Review) T07SA00082 T14S, R13E, Section 10 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Hydrology Report, Environmental Resource Report and Revised Site Plan The overlay reviews cannot be approved as submitted. The following comments must be addressed. 1. Provide a hydrology report that includes floodplain delineation and encroachment analysis. The delineation should provide both the FEMA delineation and an analysis of the actual area of inundation. It is not acceptable to print a part of the report on the plan sheet. All engineering work must be sealed by a registered professional. 2. Provide a site plan that clearly shows the extent of all fill required for construction of the proposed residence. Include indications of the slopes at the edges of the fill. Note that any fill slopes visible from Speedway must be no steeper than 3:1. 3. Clearly identify on the site plan all areas of disturbance within the floodplain areas. A suitable mitigation plan is required for any disturbance within riparian areas in the floodplain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 07/26/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 26, 2007 Jesus/Cynthia JACA Design P.O. Box 1131 Marana, Arizona 85653-9899 Subject: T07SA00082 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone for 1833 West Speedway Blvd. (T07CM01155) Dear Mike: Your submittal of May 17, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD). The public comment period will be opened during the week of July 30, 2007. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 616-0200 |
| 07/26/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | March 29, 2010 JACA Design Jesus/Cynthia PO Box 1131 Marana, Arizona 85653-9899 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILES Scenic Corridor Overlay Reviews Maximum Review Period The subdivider has one (1) year from the date of plan submittal to obtain approval of the plans. Failure to obtain approval means the review period has expired Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date T07SA00082 1833 West Speedway Blvd May 17, 2007 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat applications are required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file T07SA00082 |