Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07OT02408
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/18/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/26/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/26/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 03/06/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 6, 2009 SUBJECT: New Parking Lot - Site Plan TO: Donna Mertes LOCATION: 899 E Silverlake, T14S, R14E, Section 19, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07OT02408 (Third Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. 2. Complied 3. Development Services has modified review procedures for handicap access. Please see any comments below that were discussed with Ron Brown, Structural and Accessible Plans Examiner. 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Complied 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Complied 13. Complied 14. DS Sec 2-02.2.1.A.19: Label existing and future right-of-ways for all streets indicated on site plan along with curb(s) and sidewalk locations (existing curb and sidewalk if maximum right of way taken). Additional Comment: Verify that each right-of-way has both the existing and future right-of-way labeled and dimensioned correctly. If the right-of-way dimension is a ½ right-of-way, identify it as a ½ right-of-way. For any dimensions that are both existing and future, label accordingly. 15. DS Sec 2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify dimensions for right of way for Euclid Avenue. If there is no future right-of-way then label dimension as existing/future right-of-way. 16. Complied 17. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Indicate on the site plan and in details that all handicap access ramps at crosswalks and at the transition of a pedestrian circulation area to a vehicular use area have required detectable warning devices (truncated domes). See detail Q on sheet S7. Truncated domes only need to be located in the areas where no wheel stops are located. - Complied (Note: accessibility review is no longer completed by engineering). Additional Comment: Detectable warnings along entire accessible parking row in detail Q on sheet S7, is not required per 2006 IBC, ICC, Ansi 117.1. This is owner optional per Ron Brown, Structural and Accessible Plans Reviewer. 18. Complied 19. Complied 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.32: Provide detail for trash enclosure and identify on site plan. Additional Comment: Provide detail of trash enclosure. See enclosed detail for Solid Waste Disposal (Refuse). Depict 40' back up on plan view to ensure adequate space is provided. Add turning radii on plan view for refuse vehicle from trash enclosures. In addition, driveway is to be a minimum of 12' for access of refuse vehicle. 21. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 22. Complied 23. DS Sec. 2-02.2.1.C: Add note to site plan - "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 24. See additional comment for comment 17. 25. Complied 26. Complied 27. Complied 28. Complied 29. Explain use/purpose of 14' paved area on sheet S4. It appears that it may need curb returns to exit onto Park Avenue. Additional Comment: The design of this area has changed. Minimum 12' paving required. Redesign may be necessary to accommodate refuse truck. Provide paving material and detail to ensure it meets minimum requirements for refuse vehicle. 30. Provide the area of disturbance which will be required for grading submittal. Additional Comment: For next submittal, it is recommended that you add grading to your site plan. Label plans as SITE/GRADING. Submit grading permit along with next submittal. Additional Comment: Explain what is being done with curb opening in the southwest portion of parcel. If curb opening is being closed to parking lot indicate on plan view. In addition, permit may be required from Traffic Engineering for work within the right of way. 31. Additional comments may be forthcoming. DRAINAGE REPORT: 32. Complied 33. Complied 34. Complied 35. Clarify in report whether two (2) watersheds upstream of the proposed north basin conveys all the flow through the basin. Additional Comments: Provide an explanation of reduction of CP2Q from existing to proposed conditions for WSON4D. 36. Complied 37. Please provide spot elevations on sheet S4 for the proposed 10' paved area to show how any flood condition flows are prevented from entering the site, as this project is a proposed cut condition. (Note: proposed area is to be a minimum of 12' in width.) 38. Complied 39. Provide erosion protection for proposed basin side slopes (required for all untenanted flow conditions regardless of slope grade). 40. Additional GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 41. DS Sec 10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report Evaluation that addresses the following: a) Complied b) Complied c) Complied d) Complied Additional Comment: Provide bleed pipe information on N-S6 or on plan view. Explain clarification for bleed pipe. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 42. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with the re-submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. A SWPPP submittal will be required along with the grading permit. Every Construction General Permit required a separate SWPPP. 43. Grading plan will require full SWPPP - see ADEQ checklist to ensure that all items have been includedd in report. SWPPP Comments: 1. Provide location map on the SWPPP and indicate and label "receiving waters". 2. Delineate grading limits on plan view and assure that they match what is indicated on the grading plan 3. Provide contour lines at minimum 2' interval on plan view and call out contour interval on plan 4. Assure sufficient erosion and sediment controls are set at the downstream boundaries of disturbance areas. Assure that interim controls are placed within grading limits. 5. Provide a traffic control plan for activities taking place during construction. Provide this plan within SWPPP or along with the grading submittal. Locations of construction access and signage must be indicated on plan view of the traffic plan. 6. It appears that additional stabilized construction access area for southwest parking area and entrances to Silverlake and entrance to Park Ave. On Silverlake clarify that entrance is for construction only access, if it does it will need to have stabilized construction area access. 7. For detail 1 on SWPPP, it is recommended that the notation in regards to washed gravel backfill be removed. This practice is not normally performed in the field and could potentially cause concentrated flow and erosion where breakout occurs. In addition, add flow arrow to detail 1. 8. For NOI provide completed form that has been faxed to ADEQ, once grading plan submittal has been provided. 9. Provide operator certification, at minimum (1) operator must complete and sign certification statement. 10. Revise sequence of activities on sheet 3, to include traffic control plan during construction activities. 11. Provide contact number and information for the event of a spill. Provide a revised site plan, traffic control plan, and SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all the above comments. Submit grading permit application with next submittal. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Regards, Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 03/09/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/23/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |