Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07OT01938
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Compliance with the WASH Ordinance is not properly addressed. Although the SFR, in and of itself, is not subject to WASH - the remainder of development within 50 feet of the top of bank is subject to WASH. To the reviewer's knowledge, a WASH Overlay application has yet to be filed for this project. It should also be noted that disturbance of the WASH may necessitate a submittal to SAC. What follows below is excerpted from the WASH Application. Prior to submitting the application, the applicant is required to meet with the neighbors, neighborhood associations and Ward Office (suggested). The applicant must purchase the labels meeting the above requirements from PDSD. A label request form is included with the redlines and is also available on the PDSD website. The fee for requesting labels is $200. NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATION: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant is required to offer to meet and discuss the proposed development on a specific date with the owners of properties which are within 300 feet of the site and with the neighborhood associations that are on record with the City's Depatment of Neighborhood Resources Office in the area in which the proposed development is located. Staff suggests that the ward office be included in this notification (Chapter 23A, Section 2.2.2.1). The applicant is required to provide written proof of the offer to meet with the neighborhood, as well as documentation on any meetings resulting from the neighborhood contact. A summary of what was discussed at the meeting is also required. This meeting must be held prior to submittal of the application. MEETING DATE: _______________________________ DOCUMENTATION INCLUDED:_____________ MATERIAL REQUIRED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS Incomplete applications will not be accepted. Contact the Planning & Development Services Department regarding requirements for limited changes such as signage. The same information submitted to the City must be provided by the applicant to the neighborhood associations required to receive notice. 4 copies of the site plan or development plan (folded 8 ½" x 11"). (See Development Standards 2-02.0 and 2-05.0 for requirements.) 4 copies of the landscape plan (folded 8 ½ " x 11"). 4 copies of the grading plan (folded 8 ½ " x 11"), if there will be any cut and fill on the site or if the site is located within a Hillside Development Zone. Show how any cut/fill visible from the Scenic Route will be treated. 3 copies of NPPO plan (folded 8 ½ " x 11"). 3 topographic maps of the site (folded 8 ½ " x 11") if not shown on the grading or site/development plan. 2 sets of color photographs of the site with photo orientation. 2 copies of the Pima County Assessor's property information (current printout). 2 copies of the Pima County Assessor's map for the property. 2 copies of the letter sent to the surrounding owners, the neighborhood associations, and the Council Ward Office. 2 copies of the notarized statement, with the mailing list attached, stating that the letter was sent. NOTE: Mailing list must be compiled by the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services Department, as lists compiled by applicant will not be accepted. 2 copies of the summary of the meeting with the surrounding property owners, including the names of those who attended the meeting. Overlay Review Fee (Staff Review = $300.00; Microfiche Fee = $15.00; Total = $315.00) (does not include the $200 for labels) WASH ONLY: 4 Mitigation Plan. (Land Use Code 2.8.6.5.D & 9-06.2.2.B.2.) 4 Plant habitat inventory. 4 Hydraulic report. _________________ The drainage report is DENIED and not recommended for approval. The following comments are offered: A. Although this is the 3rd submittal of the plans, this is only the 2nd submittal of the drainage report (the same drainage report submitted for the 1st plan submittal was resubmitted with the 2nd plan submittal). Please correct the cover sheet of the report. Page 3 - Cholla Wash is subject to the WASH Ordinance. Although the SFR is exempt from the Ordinance, other development (grading, drives, culverts, bank protection, channelization, walls/fences, etc.) is not exempt based upon the SFR exemption. Please correct the entries under "Required Permits" and "Onsite Drainage". Page 5 - Please note that the channel widening is subject to the provisions of the WASH Ordinance. Page 6 - Please provide the source of the conversion between the NGVD29 and NAVD88 datums. The conversion seems low for the area. Page 6 - Please note that placement of rock riprap and channel widening are both subject to the WASH Ordinance. Page 7 - Please provide the source of the conversion between the NGVD29 and NAVD88 datums. The conversion seems low for the area. Page 7 - Please note that the grading of the wash area is subject to the WASH Ordinance and may be subject to Section 404 provisions. The applicant is advised to check with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Page 7 - Please note that rock riprap and cutoff wall bank protection is subject to the WASH Ordinance. Appendix F - Please note on the plan the location of the bank and WASH Ordinance Study Area. Appendix G - Sheet C1: Please note on the plan the location of the bank and WASH Ordinance Study Area. Appendix G - Sheet C3: Please note on the plan the location of the bank, WASH Ordinance Resource Area and WASH Ordinance Study Area. Appendix G - Sheet C4: Please note that the geotech report recommended 3:1 slopes for the riprapped slopes. _______________ Please note the following from Dev. Std. 9-06 (formerly Dev. Std. 2-13): 2.6 Ownership of PRA. Ownership of the Protected Riparian Area shall be provided in one or more of the methods set forth below to insure continued preservation of the area. Forms of ownership of Protected Riparian Areas include: A. Protected Riparian Area Areas for proposed subdivisions may be either publicly owned, owned by a common association, or owned by a non-profit association which provides for conservation management. B. Privately owned individual residential lots of 24,000 square feet or less may include Protected Riparian Area where (i) there is a conservation easement prohibiting private development within the Protected Riparian Areas, (ii) no more than ten percent (10%) of the total area of the Protected Riparian Area is included within individual private lots and (iii) no walls or fences are constructed within the Protected Riparian Areas. The common ownership and the location of any portion of the Protected Riparian Area within individual lots and applicable legal restrictions shall be included in a note on the final plat or development plan. C. Privately owned individual residential lots that are greater than 24,000 square feet may include Protected Riparian Area where (i) the Protected Riparian Area is delineated on the plat providing a surveyed description of the location within each lot, and (ii) there is a note on the plat requiring that each purchaser of a lot shall sign a disclosure form acknowledging the prohibition upon development in the Protected Riparian Area and (iii) no walls or fences are constructed within the Protected Riparian Areas. D. Where the Protected Riparian Area is on property that remains under the ownership of a single person or entity following the development, the Protected Riparian Area shall be protected through a conservation or public easement or other legal restriction upon further development. 9-06.3.0 REVIEW. Review of submitted material will be by the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) and the appropriate review sections within Development Services Department (DSD). 3.1 Staff review. Approval of plans in compliance with these requirements is the responsibility of the DSD Director. Approval of the floodplain report is the responsibility of the Engineering Section at DSD. Applications for property that is subject to adopted ERZ or WASH designations is required to be reviewed through the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Chapter 23A-50 and 51. Projects not subject to the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Chapter 23A-50 and 51 will be reviewed in concert with the timetable of the applicable process, such as, but not limited to, a plat, a development plan, a site plan, or a plot plan. 3.2 Stormwater Advisory Committee (SAC) Review. Development which encroaches within the Protected Riparian Areas, except for development limited to revegetation or restoration in accordance with an approved Floodplain Restoration Plan, shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Advisory Committee (SAC) as follows: A. All watercourses subject to adopted ERZ or WASH regulations shall be reviewed by SAC as part of the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Section 23A-51. B. All watercourses designated to be treated consistent with the ERZ or WASH regulations under this development standard and Regulatory Floodplain watercourses may be reviewed by SAC upon either the request of the applicant or upon the determination by the DSD Director that such review is appropriate. C. Review by SAC shall focus upon whether the application correctly defines, delineates and describes the Protected Riparian Area and complies with Development Standard 9-06.2.5.B.2 and 3. 9-06.4.0 PRA PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 4.1 Application. Applications for review of projects affected by this Development Standard shall be submitted to the CDRC Section at DSD. Review staff will evaluate submitted information for completeness and shall accept or reject the application within five (5) days of the date of submittal. The applicant will be notified if the application is found to be incomplete. _______________ The above is given to the applicant to aid in preparation of the Overlay Zone (WASH) Application and associated application requirements. Since the materials submitted with the current permit applications do not fully contain the information needed for WASH Ordinance review, a full WASH Ordinance review is not possible at this time. Please note that there is a good possibility that the Stormwater Advisory Committee (SAC) will review for WASH Ordinance compliance subsequent to staff review. A draft document outlining the watercourse regulation process is included with the redlines. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/23/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/23/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |