Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: FLOODPLAIN
Permit Number - T07OT01454
Review Name: FLOODPLAIN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | VOLUME I: Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk. Section 6.0 - Hydrologic Data Use of a different flow value (55,000 cfs) than the FEMA data (60,000) may make matching the FEMA water surface elevations and floodway more difficult when the LOMR is prepared. VOLUME II: Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk. Appendix C - Existing One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations. Appendix E -Proposed One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations. Appendix J - Tributary Hydrology and Hydraulics The hydrology for the tributary channels could not be reviewed as there was no watershed map. Please provide a watershed map showing the tributary watersheds. It should be to scale and use topography as a base. Tributary hydraulics were reviewed for approach but, since the hydrology is still not approved, channel hydraulics and the designs based upon the hydraulics are not accepted at this time. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/14/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |