Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07OT01454
Parcel: 13709002B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: FLOODPLAIN

Permit Number - T07OT01454
Review Name: FLOODPLAIN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/02/2007 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied VOLUME I:

Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data

Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk.

Section 6.0 - Hydrologic Data

Use of a different flow value (55,000 cfs) than the FEMA data (60,000) may make matching the FEMA water surface elevations and floodway more difficult when the LOMR is prepared.

VOLUME II:

Section 3.0 - FEMA Flood Hazard Data

Significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A LOMR is required for this project. Failure to obtain a CLOMR may put occupancy and acceptance of planned improvements at risk.

Appendix C - Existing One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data

The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations.

Appendix E -Proposed One-Dimensional Hydraulic Data

The approach states that a floodway analysis isn't being prepared because there's no significant encroachment into wash floodplains. This entire project is a significant encroachment and significant changes are being made to the floodplain and floodway. A floodway analysis is necessary to comply with the City of Tucson floodplain regulations.

Appendix J - Tributary Hydrology and Hydraulics

The hydrology for the tributary channels could not be reviewed as there was no watershed map. Please provide a watershed map showing the tributary watersheds. It should be to scale and use topography as a base. Tributary hydraulics were reviewed for approach but, since the hydrology is still not approved, channel hydraulics and the designs based upon the hydraulics are not accepted at this time.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/14/2007 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/14/2007 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed