Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07OT00402
Parcel: 111071150

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T07OT00402
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/14/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 15, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07OT00402 / T07CM00299
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2607 North Sparkman Blvd.
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert

FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT IS DENIED

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT APPLICATION, COST ESTIMATE

1. Any structure which is substantially improved at a cost equal to or exceeding 50% of the full cash value of the structure as shown on the latest assessment rolls from the county assessor or an appraisal from a licensed appraiser with the State of Arizona. The submitted cost estimate exceeds 50% of the value of the structure. The value of the structure based on the submitted appraisal is $71,238. The submitted construction cost estimate was 40,275, equals to a 57% increase in flood damage potential. The Permits Plus system estimated the construction cost at 47,272, equals to a 66% increase in flood damage potential. The proposed addition is considered a "substantial improvement," and must meet the floodplain requirements found in Chapter 26.

There are two solutions:

1) Reduce the scope of the project to bring the cost of construction down so the project is not a substantial improvement.
2) Elevate the addition to be one foot above the established water surface elevation.

The above comment is from the first review and has not adequately been addressed. It is acknowledged an estimate has been provided that is lower than the previously submitted estimate. However the valuation in the Permits Plus system still values the construction costs at 47,272 which equals to a 66% increase in flood damage potential. That said it appears that the scope of the project has not been reduced to bring the cost of construction down. Provide an approvable solution.

2. Add a general note to the plan that the entire property lies within a City of Tucson Regulatory flood hazard area. This is the second request. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/21/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/21/2007 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed