Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM04696
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SENT IS FOR A 5' HIGH CANTELEVERED RETAINING WALL DESIGN. WALLS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE 8' HIGH. 2. PLEASE RETURN STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS TO US FOR FOUNDATIONS AND CANOPY FRAMING SO WE MAY APPROVE THEM. |
| 06/23/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Buildnig plan will be reviewed and approved once an approved site plan has been submitted. JG |
| 06/25/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Clean Energy T07CM04696 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 25, 2008 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t07cm04696.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 06/30/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The required dimensions for the overflow scuppers for the canopy are based on the size of the roof drains. Per Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, the minimum height for a scupper is 4" and the minimum width is equal to the circumference of the required roof drain. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Indicate that all hoses, hose connections, dispensers, and gas detection systems shall be listed, and that vehicle fueling connections shall be listed and labeled. Reference: Section 413.2.2, IFGC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Show the locations and termination design of the vent stacks noted on sheet M02. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2006. |
| 07/18/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Fixture S1 is listed as MH on the lighting code compliance luminaire schedule, but a note on the same page, E04 has it as HPS. Please clarify, and note any changes as necessary to the lighting compliance calculations. PREVIOUS COMMENT. 2. Registered Structural Engineer shall provide calculations and detail for lighting pole and foundation. Please coordinate this with other disciplines. PREVIOUS COMMENT. Drawing C04 Detail 9 sealed by a Civil Engineer, not Structural per the requirements. Calculations were not included per the original review comment. And the 33' height per Note 1 on Detail 6 Sheet E06 is in conflict with the 35' requirement on Note 3 sheet E04. 3. Per Sheet S06 Note 11, electrical equipment shall not be supported by the metal deck. This appears to be in conflict with the mounting of the fixtures on the Lighting Plan Sheet E04. 4. Provide the means to remove all external voltage sources, including feedback, during maintenance. NEC 514.13. PREVIOUS COMMENT. Please add "NEC 514.13" to Special Note 2 on Sheet E02. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/23/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |