Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM04648
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2008 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Interstate Business Park - Lot 1 T07CM04648 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. Zoning was not able to locate any information on the final plat which states that the "Temporary Turnaround Easement" is to be abandoned. Provide documentation that supports the abandonment of this easement. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 The existing "Temporary Turnaround Easement" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the site plan. Contact the City of Tucson Real Estate department for the requirements to abandon this easement. 3. In your response to Comment 16 you state that a lot combination will be recorded. This said, the east property line shown on this site plan is shown as a straight line. Based on a copy of the submitted plat, this property line would have a jog at the proposed Lot 6, please clarify. Also once the proposed lot combination is complete there does not appear to be any access to Lot 6, please clarify. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The dimensions shown on Detail1/C1.2 are not shown correctly. Review D.S. 2-09.5.1 and D.S. 2-09 Figure 9. The distance between racks is 30" and the detail shows 30" on center. The distance required from the side of the rack is 30" measured from the outside edge of the rack, not the center. 5. Until the final plat is approved and the above comments either corrected or clarified this site plan cannot be approved. 6. Ensure all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 7. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t07cm04648.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 01/18/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | NPPO Exception Application approved. |
| 01/18/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A Refer to section 4.2.1 of DS 10-01 (pages 74-80 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual) for technical requirements and guidelines for basin configuration, shape and side slopes. Variation in basin shape and sideslopes is recommended. Curvilinear shapes are preferable to geometric ones where possible. When rectilinear or geometric shapes are used, soften the contours with minimum 10-foot radius curves. Continuous uniform slopes shall not exceed 20 percent of the basin perimeter. 2. For cross-referencing purposes, add the CDRC subdivision case numbers (S05-164 and C12-86-51) and any applicable case numbers to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the site plan and landscaping plan. |
| 01/28/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Tucson Water does not offer a ¾" water meter (keynotes 31 and 33); a 5/8" meter (maximum demand of 10 GPM) and a 1" meter (maximum demand of 25 GPM) are available. Evaluate the forecasted demand for the proposed building and revise the drawing accordingly. |
| 02/07/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 7, 2008 SUBJECT: Lot 1, Interstate Business Park TO: Dowl Engineering LOCATION: 3682 S Wall Street, T14S, R14E, Section 30, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM004648 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Verify that truncated domes are located at between transition of any pedestrian access and vehicular access. Reference standard detail on site plan. 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Verify that all easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 7. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the Site Plan. 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Revise Dumpster Plan Detail to include dimensions and notes as indicated on Solid Waste Disposal (Refuse) detail per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. See the attached detail and modify detail accordingly. Please add PSI for concrete on detail for dumster plan. 12. Complied 13. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out additional percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Comment acknowledged. Note that cross-section and/or additional information will be required on grading plan. 14. Complied 15. A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 16. Cut/Fill quantities exceed 5,000 cubic yards. Provide soils report with grading submittal. 17. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 18. It appears that easement has been recorded per Final Plat, provide recordation information for 12' drainage easement on site plan. Revise note on plan on site plan to read, "Proposed 12' private drainage easement by seperate instrument." 19. Complied 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Revise parking sign to include $518 Fine T.C.C. 20-222. 22. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2008 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/12/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |