Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM04510
Parcel: 12008781A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T07CM04510
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/07/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Edmund Marquez - Suzuki Dealership Expansion
T07CM04510
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 7, 2008

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t07cm04510.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
01/16/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the drawings as needed to clearly show that the design matches the submitted calculations and complies with the code requirements. Reference Sections 101.4 and 102, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
01/16/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
01/16/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide location and sizing information for the gutters and downspouts. Reference Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
01/22/2008 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
02/01/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plans can not be approved prior to site plan approval. See comments associated with the site plan review.
12/26/2007 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. H/C SIGN TO BE 84" TO BOTTOM OF SIGN
2. IDENTIFY ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES FROM STREET TO ENTRY DOORS
3. INDENTIFY ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES FROM H/C PARKING SPACES TO ENTRANCE DOORS
4. SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PATHWAY SLOPES
(1-4 AS PER IBC 1104 AND ANSI 117.1 SECTIONS 4 AND 5)
5. PROVIDE COST EVALUATION OF PROJECT SHOWNING COST BREAKDOWN OF ACCESSIBLE EVALUATION, 20%. IBC SECTION 3409.7.1
6. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR A HI/LOW WATER COOLER
7. SINK IN ROOM 105 MUST BE ACCESSIBLE; IBC SECTION 1109.3
8. SHOW LARGE SCALE PLANS OF TOILET ROOMS WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS, CLEARANCES AND FIXTURE/ACCESSORY HEIGHTS
9. SHOW TOILET INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHOWING ALL ACCESSIBILITY FIXTURE/ACCESSORY DIMENSIONS AND HEIGHTS
10. SHOW BREAK ROOM SINK ELEVATION WITH REQUIRED HEIGHTS, CLEARANCES AND ACCESSORIES.
11. ROOF PLAN NOT COMPLETE, SHOW DRAIN SYSTEMS FOR NEW AND EXISTING
12. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOT COMPLETE:
A. SHOW ROOF DRAIN ELEMENTS
B. SHOW KEYED NOTES
C. ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS DO NOT MATCH FLOOR PLAN REFERNCES
13. PROVIDE WINDOW SCHEDULE
14. DETAIL E-11/A501 NOT SHOWN CLEARLY, ONE REFERENCE ON BUILDING SECTION ONLY AND ELEMENT IS NOT DRAWN ACCORDINGLY AND NOT SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN
15. PROVIDE SPECS ON WATER HEATER MOUNTING KIT
16. BUILDING SECTION REFERENCES DO NOT CORRESPOND TO FLOOR PLAN REFERENCE MARKS.
17. REFERENCE IN FOUNDATION NOT CALLED OUT IN CALCULATIONS
18. CALCULATION COVER SHEET REFERENCES 2003 IBC, WE ARE IN COMPLIANT WITH 2006 IBC
19. COVER SHEET ALSO LISTS 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING WHILE PAGE 3 OF CALCULATIONS REFERENCES 1,500 PSF
20. PAGE 4 OF CALCULATIONS REFERENCES 2003 IBC, S/B 2006 IBC
21. PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS
22. ANY CHANGES SHOWN IN THE 11 X 17 REDUCED SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE 24 X 36 RESUBMITTAL SETS.
23. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ARE INCOMPLETE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. FINISH ALL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL
12/27/2007 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review Impact Fee's Do Apply; West District; 3,150 Square Feet Addition; Retail; Issued Before 1/16/2008 $6,312.20; Issued on and after 1/16/2008 $12,574.40

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/11/2008 DELMA ROBEY APPROVAL SHELF Completed
02/11/2008 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/11/2008 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed