Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T07CM04291
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/06/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COMMUNITY PLANNING | REVIEW | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-82-48, Ordinance No. 5651 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 02/06/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations with color renderings REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 2/06/08 The Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor states that design proposals for properties adjacent to Stone Avenue should demonstrate sensitivity to nearby neighborhoods. The NSNP also requires sensitivity to design and compatibility with existing area. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, rooflines, and materials. Please submit color elevations of all four sides of the proposed buildings. 2. General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that signs should be incorporated with overall landscaping and improve the aesthetics of a development. Plans also have policies that promote signage that is clear, but is not the dominant feature of the development. Please provide sign details on how signage will be integrated into the overall landscape theme. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion 10/25/07 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-82-48, Ordinance No. 5651 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/19/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. R.Corral 791-4505 DATE: 10/24/07 Resubmittal shall not be required at this time; based on the following conditions: In lieu of submitting elevations of the buildings now, the applicant shall add a note to the development plan stating elevations illustrating four-sided architecture and color palate shall be submitted to the Department of Urban Planning and Design for review prior to the issuance of building permits. In lieu of submitting signage plans now, the applicant shall add a note to the development plan stating signage plans, illustrating integration with the overall landscape plan, shall be submitted to Urban Planning and Design staff for review prior to the issuance of building permits. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0033 Tucson Mall Expansion 09/04/07 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-82-48, Ordinance No. 5651 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/24/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: D. R.Corral 791-4505 DATE: 8/31/07 The General Plan, North Stone Neighborhood Plan (NSNP), Design Guidelines Manual and the Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor all provide guidance for the review of this development. The Stone Avenue Corridor: Measures for a Livable Corridor states that design proposals for properties adjacent to Stone Avenue should demonstrate sensitivity to nearby neighborhoods. The NSNP also requires sensitivity to design and compatibility with existing area. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, rooflines, and materials. Please submit color elevations of all four sides of the proposed buildings. Please design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. 2. The NSNP and the Design Guidelines Manual state that the use of vegetation should be used within the parking areas to reduce heat build-up. Please provide vegetation islands, which include shade trees, within the parking areas. The General Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that signs should be incorporated with and improve the aesthetics of a development. Plans also have policies that promote signage that is clear, but is not the dominant feature of the development. Please provide the desired sign package for the proposed uses. |