Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM04214
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/23/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Pima Partnership - Addition T07CM04214 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 23, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for entire site due to a greater than twenty-five (25) percent expansion. 2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and the Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. Provide a copy of the recordation receipt. It appears that this project is comprised of two (2) different parcels. There are two (2) options in regards to utilizing the two (2) parcels as one site. Prior to approval of the site plan provide; 1) A Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property, or 2) Provide a site plan for each parcel that shows how the parcels can stand alone, if sold separately, and meet the requirements of the LUC if sold separately along with a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. 3. This comment has not been addressed. Provide documentation that shows that the split of parcel 115-08-007A to 115-08-007C and 115-08-007D was processed and approved by the City of Tucson. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Review the revised D.S. 2-09 for layout requirements for bicycle parking. Provide a fully dimensioned layout, relationship to existing fence, building, etc. The dimension provided between the bicycle racks is not shown correctly. This dimension is measure for the inside of each rack, not the center. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a fully dimensioned layout of the off-street bicycle parking area including materials for lighting. 5. Zoning was unable to find a copy of the letter from Jose Ortiz, provide a copy of the letter. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 If applicable show future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. A two (2) foot setback is required between the existing wrought iron fence, located along the south side of the existing building, and the PAAL. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 a minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a parking area access lane (PAAL) and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. This said, provide the required two (2) foot setback between the PAAL and the dumpster enclosure, and the wrought iron fence shown around the patio and util. area along the south side of the existing building. This also applies to the PAAL located to the west of the existing building next to the fence along the plan area. 7. This comment was not addressed correctly. The pedestrian circulation/accessible route must be an accessible route, sidewalk. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide a pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the dumpster location. 8. This comment was not addressed. The required pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required to connect all public access area of the development. This said, demonstrate how the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route is maintained along the south side of the existing building. It appears that the existing equipment will reduce the pedestrian circulation/accessible route below the minimum allowed, four (4) feet. The proposed bollards located east of the existing equipment appear to be located directly in the center of the pedestrian circulation/accessible route. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide a pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the sidewalk in the right-of-way along Seventh Ave. If there is no sidewalk along Seventh Ave. then this sidewalk will run to the property line along Seventh Ave. 9. Zoning was unable to find a copy of the letter from Jose Ortiz, provide a copy of the letter. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Show the future right-of-way for both Stone Avenue and Drachman. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Provide the docket and page for the billboard loading space access easement. 11. Zoning was unable to find a copy of the letter from Jose Ortiz, provide a copy of the letter. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.22 If applicable show the future curbs for both Stone Avenue and Drachman. 12. Zoning acknowledges the parking area expansion calculation but was unable to locate the building expansion calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building area expansion calculation and a parking area expansion calculation. 13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t07cm04214.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 01/23/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning comments. |
| 01/28/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit an application for NPPO exception. Include acceptable documentation as required. LUC 3.8.4.2 |
| 01/28/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The street landscape border along Seventh Avenue must extend along the street side of the parking spaces (including the two tandem spaces) on both sides of the entrance drive. Per LUC 3.7.3.2.B, screening must be located on the development side of the street landscape borders in these areas. The existing 6-foot wall, which is located along the property line in this area must be removed and the required screen placed at the back of the street landscape border. The screen is required to be only 30" high for screening of the vehiclar use area/parking lot per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise plans accordingly. 2. The 30" high masonry screen wall adjacent to the entrance drive along Stone Avenue must extend the length of the parking space for required screening of vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.2-I 3. Note that a minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a parking area access lane (PAAL) and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. See Zoning Review comments. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 |
| 02/13/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 13, 2008 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review TO: Jessica LOCATION: 1346 N Stone Ave, T14S, R13E, Section 1, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM04214 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Comment letter does not match site plan comment numerical order. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan. 2. The most recent information in representing in the City of Tucson GIS system indicated that lots presented on site plan are separate parcels. Lot combo will be needed prior to approval of site plan. See zoning comments. Provide approved lot combo and/or appropriate documentation. 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Revise sight visibility triangle for near side of intersection of Drachman and Stone D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Provide letter referrenced in comment letter. 7. Complied 8. Sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. On site plan provide dimension of existing sidewalks and curbs. Specifically add dimension for sidewalk along Stone Ave. 9. Complied 10. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.Drainage patterns and finished grades appear to be located on the grading plan. Indicate drainage patterns and finished grades on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 or revise plans to read Site/Grading Plan. 11. Complied. 12. Complied. Add wheel stop along pedestrian access to trash enclosure. 13. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows for roof drainage. Specifically show roof down spout locations for proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide original copy of scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk in the drainage statement. Reference letter on site plan. Include type of scupper in note 26. 14. Show dimensioned future right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Provide copy of letter by Jose Ortiz for review by Engineering Department. 15. Complied 16. Complied 17. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 12-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future ROW. Provide copy of letter from Jose Ortiz to Engineering. 18. Verify that all easement of record for existing and proposed utilities (water, gas, electric) and public/private sewer lines. must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Provide recordation information for each easement on plans accordingly. 19. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 20. Complied 21. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Provide key notes to site plan for easy reference for inspector. 22. Complied 23. Complied 24. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 25. PComplied 26. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information (phone number). Provide the information for the Drainage Engineer. 27. Complied 28. Complied 29. Be advised that a Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) may be required during Grading plan submittal. Acknowledge area of disturbance on sheet C2.0. Provide actual area of disturbance. 30. Complied 31. Complied 32. Complied 33. Complied 34. Complied 35. Complied 36. Additional comments may be forthcoming. DRAINGE REPORT - Denied 1. Complied 2. Provide copy of original scupper calculations. Original seal and signature. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |