Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM04213
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | No mechanical systems proposed. |
| 03/13/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/20/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 520.837.4907 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Provide location of sub-panel. 2. Specify conduit and conductor size and type. 3. NEC 2005 applies, not IRC. 4. Demonstrate compliance with the 2006 IECC. 5. Provide load calculations for panel and service. 6. Provide electrical line diagram. 8. Demonstrate compliance with NEC 500, 501, and 511. Any identification of Classification shall be very specific. All wiring methods shall be very specific. Description of any equipment shall be very specific. 9. Arizona State Board of Technical Registration Statutes 32-143 Exceptions, states: A registrant under this chapter may engage in practice in another category regulated pursuant to this chapter only to the extent that the person is qualified and to the extent that the work may be necessary and incidental to the work of the registrant's profession on a specific project. This exception does not apply to public works projects. Based upon the plans and in accordance with the State Board of Technical Registration Rules, this plan should be designed and sealed by an Arizona Registered Professional Electrical Engineer. |
| 03/24/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/10/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 10, 2008 SUBJECT: Garage Addition - Full Compliance TO: Antonio Romano LOCATION: 770 W Grant Road, T14S, R14E, Section 18, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM04213 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. Be sure to include response letter with next submittal. 2. The most recent aerial photo of the building does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Please modify site plan to represent actual footprint of building and/or clarify. Explain what is going to be done with the storage structures that are on site. 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4: Location map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" =1 mile, and provide the following information a. Complied b. Compllied c. Section, township, range; section corners; north arrow and scale labeled. 6. Provide lot bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 7. Complied 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 9. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 10. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 25-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the driveway entrance along Fort Lowell Road. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement and entirely on the subject property, which must also be depicted on the site plan. If this is not required - provide documentation. 11. Complied 12. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to show the minimum 20-foot separation that is required between adjacent driveways. Refer to Tucson Code (TC) Chapter 25-39 for curb cut and driveway requirements. 13. Complied 14. Complied 15. Complied 16. Complied 17. If loading space is required fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 18. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 19. Complied 20. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 21. Complied 22. Complied 23. Complied 24. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the 9-foot future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all improvements are located outside of the future ROW. 25. Verify that easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. If these have been addressed provide explanation on response letter. 26. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 27. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on plan. 28. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 29. Complied 30. Complied 31. Complied 32. Complied 33. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 34. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 35. Complied 36. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. Information should include a contact name. 37. Indicate all symbols on plans and reference in legend. 38. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide typical parking space detail for parking areas. Provide site plan parking dimensions, note and parking details for both standard and handicap parking, together with access thereto. See DS Sec. 3-05.2.0.B.1 for minimum parking standards. 39. Verify that all text is a minimum of twelve point font for microfilming and record keeping. 40. Provide documentation from Environmental Services for approval of refuse container service. 41. Provide a dimension for the PAAL that is between the sidewalk, located on the south side of the building and the south property line. It does not appear that the PAAL meets the minimum 24' foot width for a two way PAAL. 42. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2008 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/15/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |