Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T07CM03935
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COMMUNITY PLANNING | REVIEW | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT T07CMO3935 Ganley Apartments () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (X) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 2/5/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Site Plan () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other - Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 2/5/08 The Plans call for usable common space, passive or active, with possible detention/retention basins designed as common open areas. Please identify amenities to be included in the detention/retention area including shaded seating areas, picnic tables, and barbecue grills and a tot lot. Also, please show the recreational area is handicapped-accessible by an all-weather path and indicate how pedestrians will access the basin. Note: Do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the recreation areas. The proposed project presents possible buffering and screening concerns for the existing single-family residence located at the southeast corner of the project. Staff notes wall was raised from 5 feet to 6 feet, however, parking area adjacent to the residence is to be screened with augmented landscaping to mitigate any potential negative impacts, such as noise, odor, and lighting. Plan policy delineates that refuse containers should be located at least 50 feet away from adjacent residentially zoned areas; screened with masonry walls and landscaping to mitigate any visual and noise impacts. The site shows a proposed dumpster at the southeast corner of the project immediately adjacent to the single-family residence to the east and another dumpster located midway between the northeast and southeast corners adjacent to R-2 zoning to the east. Staff notes dumpster has been relocated, however, a detail of dumpster enclosures to include landscape screening for all dumpsters so as to demonstrate compliance with Plan policy needs to be submitted. The Plans call for the softening of the visual impact of masonry walls, that all walls are to be graffiti-resistant and will incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or, trees and shrubbery in voids created by wall variations.” Additionally, any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please provide a detail, which shows how this requirement will be met. The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The tentative plat does not appear to provide or show how it will mitigate the potential negative impacts of more intense development on the established neighborhood in regards to lighting and pole height. Please add a note in the General Notes section to read, “all outdoor lighting will be directed down and away from adjacent residential parcels, residentially zoned property and public rights-of-way”. The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The proposed project did not provide elevations the proposed multi-family units. Please provide elevations of proposed multi-family units in order to show that the side and rear of buildings are commensurate with appearance to the front façades. Two-story units adjacent to single-story units may adversely affect the privacy of the adjacent units; therefore, units at the southeast corner of the RCP should be designed to have similar height to protect the privacy of the adjacent single-family residence to the east. Please provide a note in the General Notes section to read units 7102 and 7202 at the southeast corner of the RCP will be limited to single-story. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT T07CMO3935 Ganley Apartments 11/26/07 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: November 23, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Site Plan () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other - Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: November 26, 2007 Since this is an RCP, it must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the Kino Area Plan, the General Plan, and any of their components. The Design Guidelines Manual, which offers insight and clarification into land use and community design policies, is also used as an additional resource. The Kino Area Plan states proposals for higher density residential development should be sensitive to existing neighborhoods. Specific design factors which minimize the impact of new development on adjacent lower density residential areas should be included as an important consideration during development review process. GP policies promote neighborhood identity and visual character, as well as quality in design for residential development (Element 4, Community Character and Design, Policies 5 and 6). Supporting Policy 6.1 promotes development that … protects the integrity of existing neighborhoods, complements adjacent land uses, … and enhances the visual quality of the … community. The Plans call for usable common space, passive or active, with possible detention/retention basins designed as common open areas. Please identify amenities to be included in the detention/retention area including shaded seating areas, picnic tables, and barbecue grills and a tot lot. Also, please show the recreational area is handicapped-accessible by an all-weather path and indicate how pedestrians will access the basin. Note: Do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the recreation areas. The proposed project presents possible buffering and screening concerns for the existing single-family residence located at the southeast corner of the project. The proposed five-foot-high-wall adjacent to the residence should be augmented with additional landscaping. Please demonstrate on the site plan how the parking area adjacent to the residence will be screened to mitigate any potential negative impacts, such as noise, odor, and lighting. Plan policy delineates that refuse containers should be located at least 50 feet away from adjacent residentially zoned areas; screened with masonry walls and landscaping to mitigate any visual and noise impacts. The site shows a proposed dumpster at the southeast corner of the project immediately adjacent to the single-family residence to the east and another dumpster located midway between the northeast and southeast corners adjacent to R-2 zoning to the east. Please relocate these dumpsters and provide a detail of dumpster enclosures to include landscape screening for all dumpsters so as to demonstrate compliance with Plan policy. The Plans call for the softening of the visual impact of masonry walls, that all walls are to be graffiti-resistant and will incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or, trees and shrubbery in voids created by wall variations.” Additionally, any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please provide a detail, which shows how this requirement will be met. The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The tentative plat does not appear to provide or show how it will mitigate the potential negative impacts of more intense development on the established neighborhood in regards to lighting and pole height. Please provide a note in the General Notes section to read, “all outdoor lighting will be directed down and away from adjacent residential parcels, residentially zoned property and public rights-of-way”. The Plans provide for guidelines that help to promote compatibility of new development with existing land uses. The proposed project did not provide elevations the proposed multi-family units. Please provide elevations of proposed multi-family units in order to show that the side and rear of buildings are commensurate with appearance to the front façades. Two-story units adjacent to single-story units may adversely affect the privacy of the adjacent units; therefore, units at the southeast corner of the RCP should be designed to have similar height to protect the privacy of the adjacent single-family residence to the east. Please provide a note in the General Notes section to read units 7102 and 7202 at the southeast corner of the RCP will be limited to single-story. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2008 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |