Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07CM03809
Parcel: 13305054L

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE

Permit Number - T07CM03809
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/15/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Calvary Chapel of Tucson - Parking Expansion
T07CM03809
Site Plan (3rd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 15, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance due to a greater than twenty fire (25) percent expansion of vehicle use area.

2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of the Combo Request and a receipt from the Pima County Assessors Office. Provide a copy of the documents that were recorded under Docket 13255 Page 937. Also provide a note on the plan stating "COVENANT REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF REAL PROPERTY RECORDED UNDER DOCKET ??????? & PAGE.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide materials for lighting and a fully dimensioned layout. There are not dimensions shown for D.S. 2-09.5.1.A & B, and D.S. 2-09.5.2

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It is not clear what is planned for the striped area, shown south of the landscape areas at the south end of the parking, along the west end of the existing buildings. Keynote 22 calls out a 5' wide walkway. The walkway areas directly south and adjacent to the landscape areas are required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the travel lane. The areas where the proposed 5' wide walkway cross a PAAL maybe a striped crosswalk.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There is not a ramp shown at the north end of the western most crosswalk. The ramp shown at the north end of the eastern most crosswalk appears to only ramp up to east. How will a handicapped person access the main building from this ramp? Provide a detail.

6. D.S. 202.2.2.A.4 This comment was not fully addressed. The van accessible vehicle parking calculation should show the require 3 and provided 4.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The wheel stop shown on the angled parking with rectangular planters detail appears to reduce the parking space length to less than 15'-6" measured form the wheel stop, 18'-0" overall, fully dimension this detail. Again check with the Landscape Review section for wheel stop requirements for this type planter.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The existing sidewalk shown at the west end of the existing building does not meet the minimum width for a sidewalk, see D.S. 2-08.5.1.A.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There is an accessible ramp system proposed for the northwest corner of the existing building. Please clarify why this is proposed at this location as there are no accessible vehicle parking spaces with in the vicinity. Also this ramp system does not appear to connect to any other accessible route on site and must provide an accessible route to the proposed accessible parking spaces. This ramp system also appears to encroach into the sidewalk running along the west side of the building.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The striped area, shown north of the landscape areas at the north end of the parking, along the west end of the existing buildings, is allowed to be a striped crosswalk as it crosses the PAALs only, it must be a sidewalk and be physically separated at the landscape areas. An access ramp is required at the west end.

11. Based on recent discussions with Ron Brown, Structural Review, City of Tucson, Development Services Department in regards to the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 and the requirements for detectable warnings (truncated domes), it has been determined that some locations previously requiring truncated domes may no longer require them. The following comments are a direct result of these discussions. If you have any questions in regards to the requirements for truncated domes contact Ron Brown @837-4908.

12. Truncated domes are only required at the access ramps that provide access to the crosswalk that crosses a vehicle use area. This said remove the truncated domes shown at the handicapped access aisles and the transition from the raised sidewalks to the flush sidewalks.

13. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

14. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t07cm03809-3rd.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
05/15/2008 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Comments
05/19/2008 CPIERCE1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Needs Review
05/19/2008 CPIERCE1 PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review