Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM03574
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/30/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s) and dimension them to the property lines. |
| 09/05/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: One North Fifth T07CM03574 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 6, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. 3. This site plan is required to meet Development Standards 2-08 (Pedestrian Circulation), D.S. 2-09 (Bicycle parking), DS 3-01 (Street Development), DS 3-05 (Vehicular Use Area Design), LUC Sec. 2.8.10 (Rio Nuevo and Downtown Development Zone) LUC Sec. 3.3.6 (Parking exceptions), and all pertaining sections of the Land Use Code. 4. Based on the information provided under "PROJECT DATA, SITE AREA" there appears to be some type of lot split, lot combo or lot line relocation proposed. This lot split, lot combo or lot line relocation will need to be approved by the City of Tucson prior to approval of the site plan. 5. Zoning acknowledges that Administrative Waivers may be requested for portions of Development Standards and the Land Use Code. Pedestrian circulation and disabled accessible routes are items that will not be allowed to be waived. 6. There appears to be a street called out along the west side of this parcel, Arizona Avenue. Has this street been dedicated to the City or is it proposed? 7. It appears that 10th Street is planned to be abandoned. Provide documentation approving this abandonment. 8. Add a note to the plan stating "THIS SITE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE"; SEC. 2.8.7, DOWNTOWN HERITAGE INCENTIVE ZONE; SEC. 2.8.10 RIO NUEVO AND DOWNTOWN (RND) ZONE." 9. Define what the commercial use will be. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide overall building dimensions on the plan. If applicable show any overhangs or canopies. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Congress Street is listed as an arterial street on the City of Tucson's Major Street and Routes Plan, therefore the setback for the proposed expansion required along the south and east property lines would be measured from the back of curb. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B this setback is twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest. Once the height of the proposed expansion is provided zoning will be able to verify the required setbacks. This said provide the setback dimension and the height of the proposed setback. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide the required off-street parking, including fully dimensioned layout, location, parking spaces' size and number, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto. Zoning acknowledges that waivers or a MDR may eliminate the parking requirements. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the location of the required Class 2 bicycle parking on the plan. Provide a detail for the Class 2 bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show the sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There does not appear to be any accessible ramps at the street intersections, please clarify. See Engineering comments. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Show the required loading space and maneuvering area on the plan. Zoning acknowledges that waivers or a MDR may eliminate the parking requirements. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Add "MS&R" to the street name for "CONGRESS STREET". 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan. The "PROJECT DESCRIPTION PHASE TWO NEW COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION" needs to be clarified so that zoning can complete the review. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 The proposed refuse location requires approval from Solid Waste and Engineering. Also a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) maybe required, talk to Engineering about this issue. The following calculation comments are based on development designators "X" for residential and "36" for commercial: 24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Zoning acknowledges the proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR), provide the allowed. 25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide the allowed percentage for lot coverage. This said, per development designators "X" the maximum lot coverage allowed is 80%, the plan calls for 85%, a Board of Adjustment for Variance maybe required. 26. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The parking calculation needs to be revised. For the multifamily portion the parking calculation is based LUC Sec. 3.3.6.1.C. Once the Commercial Use is clarified zoning will be able to verify the required number of vehicle parking spaces required. 27. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide a bicycle parking space calculation, required and provide. Based on 0 parking spaces provided and LUC Sec. 3.3.3.5 two (2) bicycle-parking spaces are required. 28. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Loading calculation, clarify what size loading space is required. Per the calculation provided a Board of Adjustment for Variance maybe required. 29. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a building area expansion calculation. 30. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 31. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. I:\planning\site\t07cm03574.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/06/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 09/06/2007 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 09/18/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Applications for projects within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall be reviewed in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures, 23A-32. The application must include a Design Context and Compatibility Report in conformance with Development Standard 9-10.2.0. Plans must meet applicable LUC and building code requirements. 2. Street landscape borders are not required if the ground level story of a building containing a parking structure is not used for motor vehicle parking or if the parking structure is completely screened and enclosed by a masonry wall per LUC 3.7.2.4.C 3. The Landscape section has determined conceptual compliance with the applicable RND and LUC landscape requirements. Include with re-submittal DRB approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 09/18/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 09/27/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer and e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts Reference City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 2.3 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 09/28/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 2, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM03574 PROJECT NAME: One North Fifth PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 North 5th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TITLE REPORT, DRAINAGE STATEMENT 1. Provide the site plan activity number and any other City of Tucson Development Services Department's case numbers in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. 2. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D. Include the Section with the Town and Range. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets. Show the section lines and label. The lettering shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4. 3. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. The current font measures to 10 point, it must be at least 12 point or greater in size. Revise all lettering to be at least 12 point. 4. Provide existing and future site visibility triangles (SVT) in all the required locations, this includes street corners. For the required information refer to DS 3-01.5.1. 5. Clearly indicate on the plan the width of all sidewalks within the ROW. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. 6. Be advised accessible ramps are required at all street intersections. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 7. Loading spaces are required for all commercial development. A loading space has not been provided. This office recognizes that waivers or an MDR eliminate the requirement for a loading space. However if a loading space is provided, show the loading vehicle maneuverability for the required space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 8. Provide flow arrows and locations for all roof down spouts on the site plan. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide a Drainage Statement with calculations and scupper details stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16. 9. This office acknowledges that the probability for a grading plan to required is minimal, however because it is a requirement of the Development Standards Site Plan Content and Specifications include on the site plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 10. Indicate if all roads are public or private. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 11. Label Congress Street as an MS & R Street. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 12. After reviewing the Department of Transportation Map Site it appears that Arizona Avenue stops on the south side of Congress Street. It is not clear why Arizona Avenue is shown on the west side of the building. Clarify in the response letter. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 13. In addition to the above comment clarify what is being proposed with 10th Avenue. Is the street being abandoned? If this is the case provide the documentation approving the abandonment. Recordation information will need to be shown on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 14. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the site plan with recordation data, book and page. Provide the required information on the site plan and provide a current title report for verification. 15. If Arizona Avenue is going to become an official public street, dimension from street centerline to the existing curb and existing sidewalk location. 16. Provide existing on site and off site spot elevations/grades for the property. Include the datum; either NGVD 1929 or NAVD 1988. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16., 23. 17. New projects will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Contact Andy Vera of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1212 to reach an agreement that does not meet Development Standards 6-01 and to obtain a DSMR. DS 6-01. 18. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2007 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/02/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |