Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T07CM03544
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/31/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | An approved site plan by all reviewing agencies is required prior to building plan approval. |
| 09/11/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/11/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/26/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | Modular buildings shall be approved by the State of Arizona. |
| 09/26/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide justification for not properly connecting the drain from the drinking fountain to the drainage system from the buildings. Reference Section 304.0, UPC 2006. 2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (#9636-09); it is shown as 2771.3' on sheet 12 but 2771.81' on sheet 2. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation of the new restrooms (2772.5'), provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide justification for the trap shown in detail 6/sheet 10. The maximum vertical distance for a fixture tailpiece is 24" (Section 1001.4, UPC 2006) |
| 09/26/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the size of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/03/2007 | WILDAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Date October 13, 2007 City of Tucson Development Services P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 RE: Lincoln Park Amphitheater and Gazebo (A/S) – 1ST REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T07CM03544 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7077 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments, which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all indicated corrections and revisions to the plans must be made, and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2006 IBC, 2006 IMC, 2006 IECC, 2006 UPC, 2006 IFC, and the 2005 NEC (with local modifications). Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Roger Brooks. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms Assembly (A-5) GAZEBO Toilet Bldgs. (2) N/A 38 N/A II-B II-B II-B 1,246 576 227 NO NO Special Inspection is required for the following items: High Strength Bolting; Welding – Shop and Field The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals: Prefabricated Ramada; Prefabricated Toilet Buildings GENERAL COMMENTS: A signed special inspection form from the City of Tucson is required for High Strength Bolting and Welding – Shop and Field at the time that the plans are resubmitted for a back check. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy. A deferred submittal letter for Prefabricated Ramada and Prefabricated Toilet Buildings will need to be forwarded directly to the Building Official and approved prior to the plans being delivered to the City. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy. The City of Tucson requires that all plans and documents use printing that is a minimum of 1/8th with all capital letters to facilitate microfilming of documents for permanent record. Please revise the structural calculations and plans to comply. Reference the City of Tucson submittal Requirements. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet S-1 The prefabricated toilet buildings shall comply with the City of Tucson adopted codes listed at the beginning of this letter, including the 2003 ICC/ANSI 117.1. Please revise the plans accordingly. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet #8 References to Details 4C on Wall Sections 1, 2, 3, and 6 appear to be “typo’s” and should refer to Detail 5C. Please confirm and correct. Reference 2006 IBC, Section 106.1.1. Sheet #9 References to Detail 10/9 and 8/8 at the handrail and guard on Stair C and to the handrail on Ramp A appear to be incorrect. Please confirm and make necessary corrections. Reference IBC, Section 106.1.1. The detail reference to 4C/10 on Ramp B appears to be incorrect. The reference should be to 5C/11. Please confirm and make appropriate corrections. Reference IBC, Section 106.1.1. Sheet #10 Concrete Header A reference to 6/11 should be 7/11. Please confirm and correct. Reference IBC, Section 106.1.1. Sheet R-1 Provide a foundation plan for the Ramada structure, unless the foundation is part of the deferred submittal to be provided by others. Prior approval by the City Building Official is required for ALL deferred submittals. Reference IBC, Section 106.3.4.2. Sheet S-1 Provide calculations for the foundation for the two (2) toilet buildings to include lateral forces against overturning and sliding. Reference IBC, Chapter 16. PLUMBING COMMENTS: Sheet #12 Please correct the title of the plumbing code to the adopted 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Not part of this review. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Sheet S-1 Provide an 18” vertical grab bar located a minimum of 39” to a maximum of 41” from the rear wall to the centerline of the bar and a minimum of 39” to a maximum of 41” from the bottom of the bar to the floor. Reference 2003 ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 604.5.1. The toilet tissue dispenser shall be located so the centerline of the dispenser is a minimum of 7” to a maximum of 9” in front of the water closet. Reference 2003 ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 604.7. Sincerely, WILLDAN Roger A. Brooks, C.B.O., V.P. Division Manager RAB/cc |
| 10/05/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/10/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs DEQ review Restroom drains to "soil box" |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2007 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/17/2007 | VFLORES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |