Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T07CM03498
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please add the following automatic sprinkler criteria to the plans: 1. The hazard classification of the occupancy including any special hazards. 2. The design standard to be used. 3. The availability and adequacy of the water supply. 4. The design density and the area of operation. Also; On the cover sheet, reference is made to the FDC having Pima County threads. The correct reference is National Standard Threads. Per the 2006 IFC, all sprinkler systems containing more than 20 sprinklers shall be monitored by central proprietary station or remote station. Addtionally, please be advised that the alarm system is also a deferred submittal, and requires a separate submittal through the Fire Department. |
| 09/11/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/11/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the building plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the building plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the building plans packet processed together for site approval |
| 09/13/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; East District; 25,744 Square Feet of Educational Use (Office); $60,857.33 |
| 09/24/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | An approved site plan is required prior to building plan approval. |
| 09/28/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/30/2007 | BUREAU VERITAS | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | September 19, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T07CM03498 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.071 Jim Hedgepath 3428 E. Indian School Rd. Phoenix AZ 85018 Re: Plan Review: Tutor Time Address: 1010 S HARRISON RD Dear Mr. Hedgepeth Bureau Veritas North America has completed a First review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: One (1) set of building plans ( 78 Sheets, CS through SS-1) Sealed by David M. Cardanas, Registered Architect. Dated August 21, 2007. Structural Calculations: One (1) Set. Soils Report: One (1) report. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2006 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2006 IRC, 2006 IMC, 2005 NEC and 2006 IPC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Shelley Knuffke ICC Plans Examiner SKK;skk A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2006 International Building Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The City of Tucson adopted the 2006 Building Codes. July 1, 2007. All plans must comply with the current code. Sheet CS states the use of the 2003 IBC. Please make any changes necessary to comply with the current code and resubmit the plans. 2. Please delete all references and details that are not to be used for this project. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Shelley Knuffke at (520) 576-8400 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M- |
| 10/03/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs manhole tap permit |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/18/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |