Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T07CM03338
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Per C.O.T. amendments to the 2006 IFC (Section 508), additional fire hydrant or fire sprinklers are required. Also, keynote 15 on sheet 2 identifies a 1" water service, but the written note and arrow pointing to the same line indicates 8" water service. |
| 11/01/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T07CM03338 1937 E. Fort Lowell Rd. Site Plan 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: 11/02/07 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-01.2.1.7 Provide dimensions indicating the setbacks for the structure to all property lines and back of future curb. See later comment regarding future curb location. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.9 The bicycle parking calculations indicate 4 class one bicycle parking spaces being provided. The site plan indicates two lockers and based on location and the detail it appears that only two lockers have been provided. Detail indicates only one door. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 Bicycle parking provided on the site does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2) 3. DS 2-02.2.1.10 Provide location of the future sight visibility triangles. The parking space indicated along the south property line cannot be located inside of a sight visibility triangle. Contact the traffic division of the City of Tucson for the correct location of the future curb. I do not believe the future curb location is 11' south of the property line as indicated because of the taper for the intersection widening. There appears to be more right of way than is required for future right of way. The correct location of the future curb may be far enough south so that the parking space is not in the sight visibility triangle. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.12 See DS 2-08 for criteria for pedestrian circulation requirements. The cross walk indicated will not be allowed to be located crossing through the loading zone nor in front of the loading zone. Revise. Clearly indicate by detail or elevation call outs that the sidewalks are physically separated from the vehicular use areas. As indicated it appears that the sidewalks are flush with pavement. See DS 2-08.4.1. DS 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.13 The signs indicated in note #24 are not allowed to be located within the right of way without a Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE) from the real-estate division of the City of Tucson. If a TRE is applied for and is granted provide documentation with the next submittal. Revise general note #20 to indicate that freestanding signs are being provided. Revise general note #16 to 4 handicap parking spaces being provided. Remove general note #15, lot coverage percentage is not required. Remove general note #3, as previously noted this use does not have any "subject to:" sections. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.19 Provide the dimensioned right of way and curb location (existing and future) for Ft. Lowell. Note: This property is affected by a intersection widening for a MS&R. Clearly indicate how this development will function once the widening occurs. See engineering comments and previous comment regarding sight visibility triangles. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.25 Provide proposed lighting layout and type. Provide a detail of the proposed lighting type, indicate the clearance from grade to the bottom of the fixture. Minimum clearance is 15'. 8. Depending on responses to the above comments and changes to the site plan, further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\zoning\siteplan\DSC\T07CM03338-2.doc |
| 11/02/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 11/13/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. Additional tree is required for street landscape border. 2. Walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. Screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. Move screens wall to the back of the landscape border. 3. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Verify that the entire parking lot meets requirement. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/27/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 D of the Arizona Administrative Code states that a registrant shall sign, date, and seal professional documents that are to be submitted to any regulatory or review body. 2. Clarify the size of the site water service; the site plan indicates an 8" PVC water service but keynote 15 indicates a 1" water service to the building. 3. Indicate the proposed location of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer. The water service appears to be confined to the entry drive and the parking lot. |
| 11/29/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 29, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07CM03338 PROJECT NAME: Living Spaces PROJECT ADDRESS: 1937 East Fort Lowell PROJECT REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Complied 2. Future and Existing sight visibility triangles (SVT) are required. In addition, per site plan dimensions appears to be backwards DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. Refer to See DS 3-01.5.3 for line of site matrix. Future SVT's will be required unless meeting notes are provided or e-mail is sent to Engineering from the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Complied 7. Callout and dimension the existing sidewalk located along Fort Lowell Road. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. "EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN" noted. Provide dimension for sidewalk located to the east of proposed ingress/egress. A 6' sidewalk will be required east of driveway or call out existing width, which already appears to be 6'. 8. Show the loading vehicle maneuverability for when truck needs to back out for the required loading space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 9. A grading plan will be required for this project. To ensure a timely review, with the second submittal of the site plan, formally submit the grading plan with the grading application. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. Grading plan was not found with 2nd submittal of site plan. Nor was a permit in Permits Plus - provide grading permit number for association with site plan. Submit grading plan and permit with third submittal. 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Fort Lowell Road is designated as an arterial road with a Full future ROW dimension of 100' per the Major Street and Route Plan. Show on the plan view the future ½ ROW dimension for Fort Lowell Road with the future curb and sidewalk location. The front of future curb is to be located 11' for the MS&R ROW line. Revise the plan appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. See attached plans and verify that recordation information is correct. Future ½ ROW appears to be the existing as well for site - move dimension line so that it shows existing/future ½ ROW of 60'. 13. Complied 14. Dimension and label from the street centerline of Fort Lowell Road to the existing curb and to the existing sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 15. Complied 16. A 10' street landscape border is required for this project along the street frontage. The proposed location of the trash enclosure encroaches into the border. Revise.DS 2-02.2.1.A.32. 17. Verify that trash refuse area meets requirements of Figure 3 - Container enclosure. Copy of detail enclosed. 18. The maximum distance a solid waste collection vehicle can back up is 40'. A collection vehicle accessing the proposed location of the refuse enclosure will exceed this distance. Revise the location to meet the minimum requirements. Be advised aware refuse vehicles require 36' inside radius and 50' outside radius. DS 6-01.4.1.C. Radii appear to be labeled backwards - verify that each turning radii is labeled. 19. Provide the existing and proposed onsite to offsite 100-year discharge that is calculated and discussed in the drainage report on the plan. Label appropriately, the site plan and drainage report existing and proposed drainage locations do not match. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 20. The drainage report shows the roof drainage directed to the south side of the building. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide scupper(s) in an appropriate location and a detail of the down spout(s) and scupper(s). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 21. Grading, hydrology and landscaping structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental onsite irrigation purposes per LUC Sec.3.7.4.3.B. PAAL drainage should be utilized to make maximum use of storm water runoff. Provide curb openings to allow water-harvesting areas to accept flow from PAAL. 22. Stop light appears to be present at Fort Lowell and Campbell see attached Right of Way widening at intersections and indicate appropriately on site plan. 23. Indicate on the site plan and in details that all handicap access ramps at crosswalks or at the transition of a pedestrian circulation area to a vehicular use area have required detectable warning devices (truncated domes). 24. Correct contour interval to reflect actual interval. 25. Additional comments could be forthcoming depending on how each comment has been addressed. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The drainage report shows a 100-year discharge of 1.3 cfs from the roof that outlets on the south side of the structure. A sidewalk is within this location. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all roof discharge points. Provide calculations and scupper details stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 2. Current and Existing conditions of watershed maps do not match. 3. Provide the Q for any water entering the property from adjacent properties. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/30/2007 | THAUSER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |