Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T07CM03292
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/28/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Energy code calculations for the building envelope have not been provided. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006 2. Comment not addressed. Revise the ductwork insulation (Mechanical Note 2.04) per Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006 unless the entire building has been designed per ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. Reference: Section 501.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Comment not addressed. Revise the ventilation calculations for AC-1 and AC-2 to include the required adjustments for spaces served by a common ventilation system. Reference: Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006. 4. Condensate drains may not terminate with a direct connection to a shower tailpiece. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and Sections 311.4 and 807.2, UPC 2006. |
| 07/28/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. As per 2006 IBC, Section 1109.5.1 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 602.4, two water fountains are required with two different spout mounting heights. Please provide a code compliant water cooler layout. |
| 07/28/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/28/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. The structural engineer has called for five special inspections: a. Grading, excavation and filling b. Structural field welding c. Structural masonry d. Epoxy anchors e. Embedded anchors A special inspection certificate has been submitted for only two of these five required; welding and structural masonry. Please submit certificate for the remaining three. |
| 07/29/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide justification for not connecting the building sewer to the public sewer. Reference: Section 305.0, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Clarify the size of the indirect drain from P-8; it is called out as 1" on sheet P3 and 2" on sheet P1 (keynote 11). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. The design of the water heater has been changed but without a mounting height, it is still impossible to be sure that the routing of the T&P relief will meet the code requirements. Clarify how the temperature and pressure relief piping from the water heater is capable of day lighting not less than 6" above the finished grade without forming a trap. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 608.5, UPC 2006. 4. The T&P relief for the water heater shall not be combined with the pan drain. Reference: Sections 310.1, 310.4, and 508.4, UPC 2006. 5. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 6. Coordinate the power requirements for the water heater with the electrical designer; the water heater is gas-fueled according to the electrical plans. 7. Sheet P3 shows what appears to be a scupper but no dimensions are shown. If no scupper is intended for this location above room 108, clarify how the cricket located on the roof prevents the accumulation of water. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1106.0, UPC 2006. 8. Comment not addressed. Use Table 11-2 to size the horizontal rain leaders; the minimum horizontal leader size is 3". Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. 9. Comment not addressed. Clarify the proposed location of the downspouts for the gutters on the warehouse section of the building (i.e. no downspouts are shown). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 10. Clarify how the accumulation of rainwater will be prevented on the south side of the building where the vaulted roof meets the west wall of room 100. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/30/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning will continue with review of the building plans upon the resubmittal, approval of site plan, and once the structural review division has reviewed the plans. |
| 08/03/2009 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need septic permit w/Pima County NO SEPTIC RECORDS |
| 08/12/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Alfonso Coronado DATE: August 12, 2009 Owner 2556 E. Towner Tucson, Arizona, 85716 SUBJECT: Coronado Plumbing, 710 W. Carmen Street Building Plan T07CM03292 (Second Review) T14S, R13E, Section 02 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Building Plan. The Building Plan (BP) cannot be approved as submitted. Building Plan: 1. The BP cannot be approved prior to the site plan. Normally the BP can be approved prior to the site plan, however the building is located in a FEMA floodplain and the FFE must be approved by the site plan first. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 710 W. Carmen St._TI |
| 08/17/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/28/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |