Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM03292
Parcel: 11518054A

Address:
710 W CARMEN ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T07CM03292
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/08/2008 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed NOT A COT PROJECT
09/08/2008 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 8 SEPT 2008
T08CM03292/AL CORONADO PLUMBING
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

BUILDING REVIEW
2006 IBC

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

SHEET as1
1. Square footage calculations do not concur from PROJECT INFORMATION to CODE REVIEW CHECK LIST. Correct calculations and make both the same.
2. Occupancy Load calculations are also wrong. Recalculate and provide correct occupancy load.
3. Clarify Building Occupancy Classification as mixed use: "S-2" and "B" plus correction square footage and occupancy load statistics accordingly.
GENERAL COMMENT
4. All sheets (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and etc.) are to have fonts no smaller than 1/8" in size.
5. Provide structural calculations and details for all roof top mechanical units.
SHEET A2
6. At Wall Detail "A", partition must be braced a minimum of 48" o.c. to structure above, alternate bracing..
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS
7. Sheet S101: Provide material specifications for concrete, reinforcing, steel tubes, structural steel, masonry, grout, bolts, wood, expansion/epoxy bolts, steel deck, steel joists, etc.
8. Calculations page 14: Span information shown on the beam calculation does not match Sheet S300 plan dimensions. Clarify.
9. Calculations page 17: Beam DML3 in calculations (ML2 in schedule) is called out as ML1 in 2 locations in south walls. Clarify.
10. Sheet S400: Section 405 'Y' calls out #5 verticals at 16" o.c. maximum, but depicts greater spacing. Clarify.


END OF REVIEW
09/08/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 8 SEPT 2008
T08CM03292/AL CORONADO PLUMBING
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY REVIEW
2006 IBC

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

SHEET a1
1. If the accessible route is raised 6" from the parking paving then, a curb ramp is necessary for access from the combination marked crossing/parking aisle to the accessible route. There is not enough space for a curb ramp. Please re-evaluate this access and provide a separate detail showing dimensions, slope, top of ramp accessible clearance, detectable warning and etc. and complying with ICC 117.1, Section 406.
2. Neither toilet meets 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 accessible toilet requirements. Redesign both to comply with ICC 117.1, Chapter 6.
3. Provide a 3'-0" wide door for doors 10 and 17.
4. Reference ICC 117.1, Section 602 for drinking fountain requirements.
SHEET a2
5. Provide 2'-10" high sink counters for both details "C" and "D".
6. For detail "B", reference Section 604.5.1
7. For detail "A", reference Section 606 and 306.
8. For both details "A" and "B", reference 2006 IBC, Section 1210.2.

END OF REVIEW
09/09/2008 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Energy code calculations not provided. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006
2. Calculations not provided. Provide the heating and cooling calculations that were used to size the proposed HVAC equipment. Reference: Section 312.1, IMC 2006.
3. Revise the ductwork insulation (Mechanical Note 2.04) per Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006 unless the entire building has been designed per ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. Reference: Section 501.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Revise the ventilation calculations for AC-1 and AC-2 to include the required adjustments for spaces served by a common ventilation system. Reference: Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006
09/09/2008 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
09/15/2008 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings (P1) to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide justification for not connecting the building sewer to the public sewer. Reference: Section 305.0, UPC 2006.
3. Finish the water isometric diagram to include the hot and cold water piping and all of the pipe sizes. Reference: section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Clarify the size of the indirect drain from P-8. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
5. Clarify how the temperature and pressure relief piping from the water heater is capable of day lighting not less than 6" above the finished grade without forming a trap. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 608.5, UPC 2006.
6. Provide vents for the traps serving the service sinks. Reference: Section 901.0, UPC 2006.
7. Show the plumbing fixtures and drainage fittings installed correctly and in a manner consistent with the Code and the manufacturer's instructions. Reference: Sections 304.0, 310.4, and 707.6, UPC 2006.
8. Coordinate sheet A3 and P3 with regard to the method to be used for draining the roofs. If scuppers are to be used, show the scupper sizes, taking contributing roof areas into account. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
9. Revise the roof drainage calculations to take into account the contribution of sidewalls draining onto a roof. Reference: Section 1106.4, UPC 2006.
10. Provide the slope of the horizontal roof piping and use Table 11-2 to size the horizontal leaders. Show the size, slope, routing, and termination of the secondary roof leaders. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006.
11. Clarify the proposed location of the downspouts for the gutters on the warehouse section of the building. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
12. Clarify how the cricket located on the roof above room 108 prevents the accumulation of water if roof drains are to be used. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
13. Clarify how the accumulation of rainwater will be prevented on the south side of the building where the vaulted roof meets the west wall of room 100. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
09/18/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning will continue with review of the building plans upon the resubmittal, approval of site plan, and once the structural review division has reviewed the plans.
09/22/2008 SEPTIC APPROVAL WWM REVIEW Denied need septic permit w/Pima County
NO SEPTIC RECORDS
09/24/2008 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Commercial Electrical Plan Check
Project: 710 W Carmen St
T07CM03292
New Office and Warehouse

The plans have been denied for the following.

1. The electrical items requested on the previous denial dated 9/10/08 H have not been corrected.
Sheet E-2, wire size appears to be undersized for AC/ac, clarify and revise plans as necessary.
Remove information on panel B leave listed as spare.
Clarify wire which feeds panel B coming fron panel A, There is no such size as 180.



Ray T Majuta
Electrical Plan Check
DSD City of Tucson
520-837/4988
9/24/08
09/26/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The building plans cannot be approved prior to the approval of the site plan. PM. 09-26-08.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/02/2008 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/02/2008 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed