Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T07CM03263
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2007 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 10/19/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/22/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 22, 2007 SUBJECT: Proposed Carport TO: Gene Johnson LOCATION:6767 E Tanque Verde, T14S, R14E, Section 18, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T07CM03263 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed building plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Provide location map per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 4. Label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 5. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6. 6. Provide existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10. 7. Label all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11. 8. Label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12. 9. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14. 10. Provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.16. 11. D.S. Sec.2-02.2.1.17: It appears that cut and fill will not be occurring for the proposal. However, as part of the site submittal requirement estimated cut and fill quantities are required to be indicated on the plans so that it is clear to the inspector that no cut in fill is to be taking place. If not cut and fill is taking place indicate the quantity of zero (0) on the plan. Estimated cut and Fill: Cut = 0 and Fill = 0 will suffice. 12. Show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19. 13. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20. Verify that all easements are indicated accordingly 14. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21. 16. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 17. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.27. 18. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 23. D.S. 2-08.3.1: Pedestrian Circulation Paths Required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Areas within the development which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path are those which will be used only for maintenance or for nonpublic truck use, such as truck loading spaces. 24. Provide the site plan activity number on each sheet in the lower right hand corner. 25. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 26. Review by engineering was completed for full code compliance. Provide dimensions and explanation of use for 20' X 20' existing CMU wall labeled covered parking. Explain intent and use for 20' X 20' area. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson Development Services Department, Engineering 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 10/23/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Thomas Cleaners T07CM03263 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2007 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t07cm03263.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/14/2007 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Permit process VOID, Owners agreed with DSD to tear down non compliance structures. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2007 | ANY | REJECT SHELF | RECEIVED |