Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T07CM03214
Parcel: 12913226A

Address:
1037 E 34TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T07CM03214
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/01/2007 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 2900 Square Feet Office Space; $5,324.35
08/02/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Provide data on fire separation between basketball court and existing Angel Youth Center per IBC Table 602.
08/03/2007 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/22/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning will continue the review of the building plans once the site plan has been approved and the building code division has approved the building plans.
08/23/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code calculations to demonstrate compliance with the 2006 IECC code or ASHRAE 90.1.
2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
3. Provide the installed weight of the fan-coil units. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
5. Provide information to show that the termination of the restroom exhaust complies with the requirements of Section 401.5.2, IMC 2006.
08/23/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The water service to the proposed building appears to also serve the existing building to the south. Provide the total water demand being supplied by the water meter. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a shut off valve for the water service to the proposed building and show how the water service to the proposed building can be shut off without affecting the water service to the existing building. Reference Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Include all fixtures being served by the same water meter. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
4. Revise detail 2/P1.2 to utilize an approved connection for the condensate drain piping and the lavatory tailpiece. Reference Sections 316.2.3 and 705.0, UPC 2006. (Note that connecting the drain from an auxiliary drain pan to a lavatory tailpiece is not allowed per Section 307.2.3, IMC 2006.)
08/23/2007 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/27/2007 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1:Tucson Urban League-finance & recreation expantion
2: floor plan plbg drawing P1 and site plbg C2 do not concur
08/29/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied An approved site plan is required prior to building plan approval.
09/28/2007 WILDAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied September 28, 2007

City of Tucson Development Services
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726

RE: Tucson Urban League Expansion (Structural) – 1ST REVIEW
CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T07CM03214
WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7076

The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments, which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all indicated corrections and revisions to the plans must be made, and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable.

This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2006 IBC, 2006 IMC, 2006 IECC, 2006 UPC, 2006 IFC, and the 2005 NEC (with local modifications). Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan.

Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Roger Brooks.


Occupancy
Occup. Load
Construction
Area S.F.
Sprinklered
Alarms
Business – Office (B) 29 V-B 2,900 No
No

Special Inspection is required for the following items:
High Strength Bolting;
Welding – Shop & Field

The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals:
a. Prefabricated Metal Building and Canopy

GENERAL COMMENTS:
A signed special inspection form from the City of Tucson is required for High Strength Bolting and Welding – Shop & Field at the time that the plans are resubmitted for a back check. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy.

A deferred submittal letter for Prefabricated Metal Building and Canopy will need to be forwarded directly to the Building Official and approved prior to the plans being delivered to the City. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy.

This review is only for Architectural and Structural. The Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical reviews were done by City of Tucson staff. See the comments on the City web site under Development Services Department.

Prior approval by the City Building Official is required for all deferred submittal items or components. Submit a request in writing and provide a copy of the approval along with the submittal for back-check. IBC Section 106.3.4.2.

The plans show both the 2,900sf building and the attached canopy over the basketball court. The allowable area ratios, for the buildings under roof, need to be justified by calculation. Reference IBC Section 503, Table 503 and Section 502.1, Definition, “Area, Building”. If the existing office building is not included in calculating the allowable area, the new building’s south wall shall require a 1-hour fire resistive rating. Reference IBC Table 602.

ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
Sheet A1
Please number the exit door at the northeast corner of the building. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1.

There are no dimensions for the new canopy over the basketball court. Please provide the dimensions to define the size of the canopy. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1.

Sheet A2
Provide dimensions at the approaches to toilet room doors and the doors to the access hallway to show compliance with 2003 ICC/ANSI 117.1 Section 404 for maneuvering clearances.

Please clarify the abbreviation “SV” used on the Finish Schedule at the Toilet Rooms floor and base. Reference IBC Section 1210.1.

Please explain the locks on Doors 106A and 106B. Locking hardware could prevent occupants of the south portion of the building from access to the drinking fountain in the north portion of the building. If this is to be maintained, an additional drinking fountain shall be required on the south portion of the building. Reference IBC Table 2902.1.

General Note #7 references ADDAG Details on Sheet A3. It appears to be a “typo” and should reference Sheet A4. Please correct. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1.

STRUCTURAL COMMENTS:
Sheet S100
Please correct the required edition of the IBC to the 2006 as adopted with local amendments on both plans and calculations.

Provide the dimensions out-to-out for the new canopy over the basketball court. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1.

PLUMBING COMMENTS:
Reviewed by City Staff.

MECHANICAL COMMENTS:
Reviewed by City Staff.

ELECTRICAL COMMENTS:
Reviewed by City Staff.

ENERGY CODE COMMENTS:
Provide Energy Code calculations for the office building to show compliance with the 2006 IECC.

ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS:
See Architectural comments above and provide necessary corrections to verify compliance with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and 2003 ICC/ANSI 117.1.



Sincerely,

WILLDAN




Roger A. Brooks, C.B.O., V.P.
Division Manager

RAB/cc

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/11/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/11/2007 DELMA ROBEY REJECT SHELF Completed