Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T07CM03178
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Lots 1 & 2 Grant Int. Commons T07CM03178 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 7, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site based on an expansion of greater then 25%. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12.B and the expansion numbers provided on the plan, the cumulatively results in a greater than 25% expansion. 2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of an approved Combo Request. Provide copies of the recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property for the two parcels. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 Provide the project address on the site plan. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Label the Santa Cruz River on the Location Map. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Since the lots are being combined, remove the lot line and provide overall dimensions for the combined parcel. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide overall dimensions for the proposed warehouse addition. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Based on the location shown for the existing/future curb the northeast corner of the proposed building does not meet the minimum setback of the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the building. Plan shows "ACTUAL HR - 28'-0", therefore the minimum setback to back of existing/future curb would be twenty-eight (28) feet. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical detail for a standard vehicle parking spaces. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 On the Accessible Parking space detail, provide the maximum surface slope allowed per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 502.5. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13. It appears that there are detectable warnings shown on the Accessible Parking space detail. The shown detectable warnings do not meet the requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13.1, which states "Detectable warnings shall be 24 inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Zoning acknowledges the provided details for Class 1 & Class 2 off-street bicycle parking. Provide a plan view with a fully dimensioned layout that meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-09.5.0. This said the proposed location for the Class 2 appears to encroach into the minimum four (4) foot width for a sidewalk, between the bicycle rack and the parking overhang. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Zoning acknowledges Keynote #8, but was unable to locate the Class 1 bicycle parking on the site plan, clarify. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required to connect all public access areas of the development to any adjacent street. There does not appear to be the required connect to the sidewalk located in the right-of-way along Grant Road. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a dimension from the proposed fire riser enclosure to the edge of sidewalk. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A the minimum width of the sidewalk is four (4) feet. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Per the approved subdivision plat, Grant Interstate Commons, the "PUBLIC R.O.W." called out along the east end of the parcel is actually common area not ROW, revise the plan. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 It does not appear that the "EXISTING FUTURE ½ R.O.W." is shown correctly. Based on the COT MS&R map the future ROW for Grant Road is one-hundred-twenty (120) feet. This said the "EXISTING FUTURE ½ R.O.W." should be sixty (60) feet. On the plan the "EXISTING FUTURE ½ R.O.W." is called out as thirty-nine (39) feet. Provide a copy of the future ROW plans. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Provide the Book 46 and Page 27 for the 24' PRIV. INGRESS/EGRESS ESMT shown on the plan 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Provide the zoning for the adjacent parcel to the east. 22. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.31 Under the "CALCULAIOTNS, LAND USE CODE: PROPOSED USE" add the "Subject to: Sec. 3.5.5.1.B, F, .G, & .H.. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The provided bicycle parking calculation is not correct. The provided bicycle parking calculation is based on thirty-seven (37) vehicle parking spaces provided. As thirty-five (35) vehicle parking space are provide on the plan the bicycle parking calculation should be base on this number. Zoning acknowledges that this will not change the number of bicycle parking spaces required. Also for you information per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.8.A any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for the Class 1 spaces. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Sec.3.4.5.1: 1,500 - 25,000 sq. ft. one (1) 12' x 55' loading space is required. The plan shows 1 12' x 35' required. 25. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 26. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t07cm03178.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/07/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 08/16/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan indicates that the street bordering the east property line is a 64-foot wide public right-of-way but the Landscape Plan calls it out as a 24-foot PAAL. According to the plat for Grant Interstate Commons, this is a Common Area (private street). Revise plans to be correct and consistent. 2. Revise street landscape border dimension and canopy tree calculation to be correct based on the length of landscape border shown along the private street as well as the Grant Road frontage street landscape border. It appears that there is a total of more than 398 feet of street landscape border. Dimension the length of landscape borders on sheet L-1 per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f 3. Show required screening for the loading space on sheet L-1. A 6-foot high masonry screen wall is required to screen the loading zone from Grant Road. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3, LUC 3.7.2-I 4. In addition to the vehicle use area, the site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show and label the required 30-inch screen along MS&R Grant Road. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 |
| 08/17/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | NPPO Exception. |
| 09/19/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | September 19, 2007 To: Gabe Lara, Paragon Architects Site Plan Review for Lots 1&2 Grant Interstate Commons Activity T07CM03178 Reviewer: Loren Makus, EIT The site plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following comments. Include a letter with detailed discriptions of how each comment was addressed. 1. Revise the location and clearly label the truncated domes in the accessible parking detail. The Domes must be aligned at the interface between the vehicle use area and the pedestrian use area. 2. Clarify the ROW dimension. The plan scales to 60 feet from the Grant Road centerline to the property line. 3. Revise the estimated cut and fill quantities to be consistent with the existing and proposed grades. Include the cut for the loading dock area and the fill for the building pad. 4. Revise the solid waste enclosure detail to provide for 10 feet of clear space between the bollards protecting the sides of the enclosure as well as 10 feet of clear space between the back bollards and the gate. 5. Provide the site address on the plan. 6. Clearly show and label the sight visibility triangle for the intersection of the access easement (PAAL) and the private entrance street at the southeast corner of the project. A stormwater pollution prevention plan is required for this project. My estimates of the cut and fill quantities indicate that a grading permit will be required. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting contact me at 520.837.4927 or at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/21/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |