Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM03057
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2008 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PREVIOUS COMMENTS: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. THE ONLY CODE REFERENCES THAT ARE CORRECT ARE THE IBC AND ANSI. ALL OTHER CODE REFERENCES ARE INCORRECT. REFERENCE CITY OF TUCSON WEB SITE, BUILDING AND SIGN PERMITS 2. NEED SPECICAL INSPECTIONS FORMS FILLED OUT AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL ARCHITECTURAL: 8. Please provide protection regarding horizontal projections per section 1003.3.3 of the 2006 IBC and section 307 of ANSI 117.1-2003 for the report counter and contribution boxes. NEW COMMENTS: 1. PROVIDE SEPARATE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHOWING ALL DEVELOPED AMENITIES AND ALL DIMENSIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. IDENTIFY ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES FROM CLOSEST POINT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORATION TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE INCLUDING ALL SLOPES OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. SHOW SPOT GRADES TO CONFIRM SLOPES. B. IDENTIFY ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES AND SHOW ALL SLOPES. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES TO CONFIRM SLOPES. C. SHOW REAR EXIT AS MEETING ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS, SHOW SLOPES AND PROVIDE SPOT GRADES D. WHERE DO BUILDING SIDE WALKS GO TO? NO PERIMETER STREET WALKWAYS SHOWN? 2. DETAIL E SHEET 5: PROVIDE GRADES THROUGHOUT ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AT STAIRS. REFERENCE ANSI 406.12 AND 705 FOR USE OF TRUNCATED DOMES. 3. REFERENCE IBC 1108.2.4 FOR DESIGNATED ISLE SEATS IN THE AUDITORIUM 4. PROVIDE DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE ILSE SEATING IN MEETING ROOM 1 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN SHOWING ALL ROOFING ELEMENTS, SLOPES, TYPE OF ROOFING, DRAINGS, CRICKETS RIDGES, MIN SLOPE, GUTTER, DOWN SPOUTS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FLASHING, ALL PENETRATIONS TYPES AND FLASHING, PARAPET WALLS, FLASHINGS, CANTS AND ANY OTHER ROOF DRAINAGE ELEMENT REQUIRED FOR A PROPER DESIGNED ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM. STRUCTURAL: 1. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILING AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALL ROOF TOP MOUINTED MECHANICAL UNITS 2. VERIFY THAT ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MEETS 2006 IBC AND ASCE 7-05 3. PROVIDE POST TENSION SLAB CALCULATIONS 4. LIST CODE ANALYSIS AND LIST OF CODES USED 5. PROVIDE LATERIALK ANALYSIS COMPARISION OF SEISMIC/WIND 6. PROVIDE SHEAR WALL LAYOUT ANALYSIS AND ROOF DIAPHRAGM NAILING 7. SHEET 001 GENERAL NOTYES, FOUNDATION NOTS INCORRECT, USED POST TENSION SLAB 8. SHEET S001: GENERAL NOTES, REINF SPECIFY WHAT IS 60/40 9. PROVIDE MASONRY LINTEL DESIGN |
| 02/20/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/22/08 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 02/26/2008 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Mechanical drawings not submitted. 2. Revise the ventilation calculations (ASHRAE 62.1-2004) to comply with the requirements of Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson: the occupant density used for calculations must be at least equal to the default occupant density (Table 6-1). 3. The value "Ez" for ceiling supply/ceiling return using gas heat is 0.8, not 1.0. Reference: Table 6-2, ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. 4. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.8, IECC 2006. |
| 03/10/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide secondary (overflow) drainage for the main roof. Reference: Section 1101.11.2, UPC 2003. 2. Comment not addressed (foundation drawings not submitted). Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Sections 411.2.1 and 411.4, UPC 2003. 3. Revise the drawings to show the hot water connected to the left side of the fittings. Reference: Section 601.3, UPC 2003. |
| 04/01/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The site plan must be approved before the building plan can be approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/08/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |