Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T07CM03032
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the size of the water meter that is to be installed. The plumbing plan calls for a ¾" meter and the pressure loss calculations refer to a 1" meter. |
| 09/14/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is currently the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. You may elect to use the 2003 UPC due to the date of submission or, if you file an appeal to the Building Official, the 2006 IPC. 2. Comment not addressed. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 106.1.1, International Building Code 2006. 3. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2006, for mercantile occupancy (i.e. a service sink and a drinking fountain). 4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatory is controlled (e.g. a factory setpoint of the water heater or a mixing valve). Reference Section 414.1, UPC 2003 and Section 804.3, IECC 2003. 5. Show that the specified fixtures can be operated with a minimum pressure of 8 PSI. Correct the water pressure calculations if necessary. Reference Sections 608.1 and 610.1, UPC 2003. |
| 09/14/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 106.1.1, International Building Code, 2006. 2. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2003. 3. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust to show that recirculation of the air from the restroom will not occur. Reference Section 403.2.1, IMC 2003. 4. Provide calculations to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2003. |
| 09/27/2007 | WILDAN | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | September 27, 2007 City of Tucson Development Services P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 RE: Jeff Willmeng Homes Inc – 2ND REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T07CM03032 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7069 The second review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter third review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2006 IRC, 1997 UAC, and the 2006 UPC. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Roger Brooks. Also, please note that per paragraph V-C of the 3rd Party Agreement, third and subsequent reviews will be charged at the current hourly rate in addition to the base contract amount. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms Business – Office (B) 18 V-B-AS 1,800 Yes Yes Special Inspection is required for the following items: Welding –Field and Shop Structural Masonry Concrete The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals: Prefabricated Wood Trusses ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet A1 Keynote #16 indicates that bottled water is to be provided in lieu of a drinking fountain. An appeal to the City Building Official shall be required to allow this proposal. Provide a copy of the approved appeal or provide the required drinking fountain. IBC, Table 2902.1. Comment Remains: Appeal was not provided. Sheet A3 Please provide cut-sheets for the wall sconces each side of the front entry and coordinate with Sheet E2 for compliance with the Tucson Outdoor lighting Code. Comment Remains: The cut sheets provided do not coordinate with the calculations provided. Two different fixtures are specified. Please provide the cut sheets for the two fixtures specified. Sheet A4 Clarify the minimum required dimension of the canale opening for roof drainage. IBC, Section 1503.4 and 2006 IPC, Section 1106.3 and Table 1106.3. Comment Remains: The IPC is specified; therefore an appeal from the City of Tucson, with a signature of approval, is required. Also, The table being specified on the schedule does not exist. Please revise to Table 1106.3. Since there are parapets extending above the roof, secondary roof drainage is required. IPC, Section 1107.1. Please resolve the secondary roof drains and revise the plans as necessary. Comment Remains: Please provide an appeal for the use of the IPC with a signature of approval. Sheet A9 See comment #6 on Sheet A1 and resolve the requirement. IBC, Table 2902.1. Comment Remains: No appeal was provided. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. PLUMBING COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Sheet M1 Please correct the code editions of the IMC and IPC to the 2006 editions and verify that all changes from the 2003 editions have been incorporated into the plans for these systems. Comment Remains: The IPC has been specified and an appeal needs to be provided; yet on the codes section the 2006 UPC is specified. Only one code can be used. If the 2006 UPC is used please change all notes, references, and tables to reflect as such. Or, provide an approved appeal from the City of Tucson Building Official and make all the appropriate changes for the 2006 IPC. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. Sincerely, WILLDAN Roger A. Brooks, C.B.O., V.P. Division Manager RAB/cc |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2007 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/04/2007 | VFLORES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |